Skip to main content

They pulled me back in


When you've been married for a few years, you can make little deals with your significant other at Christmas time. The responsibilities pile up at this time of year and one of the best gifts you can receive is to not have to roam around some women's clothing store trying to pretend you know what you're doing.

So this year we agreed to get something big for the home (don't get excited -- if I told you what it was you'd be instantly disappointed), and then just a couple of little things for each other. Easy-to-shop-for things (i.e.: CARDS).

That's the plan anyway. Seems like my brain confuses my wife and myself, because all I've managed to get so far is a couple of little things for me. Namely, cards.

Yesterday, I snagged some Update and Lineage with minor success for each. Those blue border Walmart cards aren't too exciting, but I did pull one of Andre Ethier.

Then this fell out:


"Aw, it's a Diamond Giveaway redemption card," I said in my most patronizing nostalgic voice ever.

I haven't done much with the Diamond Giveaway site in months. I ordered about all the cards I wanted off it a long time ago, and there were just a few stragglers left that couldn't even draw bizarrely insulting trade offers. In fact, a few weeks ago, I went on a trading binge on the site and whittled my cards down to one 1977 need, two 1979 needs and a 1995 card that has interest only to me because it's a player I once interviewed.

None of those cards were anything that would get any trade offers. I stopped paying attention to the site and didn't even think of it again until pulling this redemption.

What the heck, I thought. Let's see what pointless 1980s card I get from Cliffy.

So, I typed in the code, squinted my eyes and ...

...

...


Holy crap, is that a card from 1952?

This card beats the oldest card I've redeemed on the Diamond Giveaway and Million Dollar sites by six years. I've already received an offer -- of four 1950s cards -- that I'm tempted to accept.

I had never heard of Saul Rogovin before this card popped up on my screen. But a simple look at the back of the card unearthed the fact that he led the American League in earned run average in 1951.

"Ho, ho!" I said in my patronizing voice again. "That was probably back when they compiled statistics by drilling holes in people's skulls to let the evil spirits out! Those silly, silly, stupid 1950s people! I'll check baseball-reference.com for the real ERA leader in 1951, compiled with modern, proper, real statistics."

But wouldn't you know it, baseball-reference says that Rogovin is the 1951 ERA champ, too.

So I've got a 1952 card of the 1951 ERA champion. Cool! Rogovin is also in the top 10 in career victories for Jewish pitchers, if you care.

But I might have to get to work on redeeming the card quickly. I've heard conflicting information on the deadline for redeeming cards, but one of those dates is at the end of this month, which would be yet ANOTHER thing I've got to do in December.

But before I grump more about that, let's see the card I got out of my Lineage pack.

Unfortunately, it wasn't a '75 mini that I didn't have. But it was something I hadn't seen before.

...

...


This Miguel Cabrera is a parallel of the Topps 3D inserts from Lineage. These cards don't have the player's name/team/position information on the front. According to the baseballcardpedia site, these cards are based on a 1968 XOGraph test issue set and are a 1:700 pull.

These particular cards are called Lineagraph parallels, are serial-numbered on the back, and feature the same sort of message as the XOGraph cards of the '60s.


I wonder if anyone is actually mailing these back to Topps?

Anyway, it's not the most thrilling, but kind of interesting to me. If Lineage had fixed the backs of its base cards, it really would have been a pretty good set, with all the wacky little historic tributes like this.

(By the way, I already have a destination in mind for the card here).

But that's it for card purchases for me. Time to actually start purchasing gifts for, you know, other people.

Comments

Nice pull on the '52! Always cool.
Dawgbones said…
trade you my 1974 checklist card for it...

yeah, really, I got a freaking 1974 checklist card!! and I've actually had one offer to trade for it! I was laughing too hard and accidentally declined it!!

Nice "pull" on the '52. I also have 1 '59 Jerry Lynch in my virtual vault that I am having shipped with the 3 diamond die cuts...
Very nice! I was thrilled when I unlocked a '52 last year.

I pulled one of those cards from Lineage...unfortunately it was Mark Teixeira. I promptly traded it.

Congrats on a couple good "pulls".
Anonymous said…
Not sure if you saw my comment before, but I do have some Update Dodgers if you'd like me to hold them for you. Just let me know!
night owl said…
I've got all the Update Dodgers already, unless you have some parallels floating around. Thanks though.

Popular posts from this blog

Stuck in traffic with Series 2

In the whirlwind that has been my life this month, I found myself going absolutely nowhere for a portion of Thursday afternoon. I was in the middle of yet another road trip, the third one this week. This one was for work, and because it was job-related, it became quickly apparent that it would be a waste of time. The only thing that could save it was a side visit to the nearby Walmart to see if I could spot some Topps Series 2. I found it right away, which was shocking as I was pretty much in the middle of the country, where SUVs share the road with tractors and buggies. Who knew that the Amish wanted Series 2, too? The problem was getting back into civilization to open the contents of the 72-card hanger box I bought. The neighboring village is undergoing a summer construction project smack in the middle of downtown. It's not much of a downtown, but the main road happens to be the main artery in the entire county. Everyone -- and by everyone I mean every tractor trailer ha

Heading upstate

  Back in 1999, Sports Illustrated published an edition at the end of the year rating the top 50 athletes of the century for every state.   As a lifelong Upstate New Yorker, I braced for a list of New York State athletes that consisted almost entirely of downstate natives, that is, folks from the greater NYC area and Long Island.   We Upstaters are used to New York City trampling all over the rest of the state. They have the most people, the loudest voices. It happens all the time. It's a phenomenon unique to this state. Heck, there are still people out there who, when you tell them you're from New York, automatically think you're from NYC. They don't think of cows and chickens when they think of New York. But trust me, there are a lot of cows and chickens in New York State. Especially cows.   So, anyway, when I counted up the baseball players that SI listed as the greatest from New York State, six of the nine were from New York City or Long Island. I was surprised all

G.O.A.T, the '80s: 30-21

  I often call this current period of the television sports calendar the black hole of sports programming. The time between the end of the Super Bowl and the beginning of televised Spring Training baseball games is an empty void when I'm looking for something to watch on traditional television. I don't watch the NBA and the NHL on TV holds my interest for maybe a period. College basketball I can't watch until the tournament. This didn't used to be as much of a problem back when I could turn instead to my favorite sitcoms in February. Do you remember when February was "sweeps month"? (Maybe it still is, I don't know). Networks would make sure that every top show aired original episodes that month, no reruns. So you'd always have something to view during the week even when the sports scene was boring. (I know, people have multiple streaming viewing options now. But I find myself going weeks sometimes before I see something I want to view on Netflix or Am