Skip to main content

They can put a man on the moon, but they can't put the right face on a baseball card

The player in the photo on this card is not Jay Johnstone, no matter what Fleer says. I think that has been established in several blog posts.

It's also been established with reasonable certainty who it actually is. But I'm going to go through it again -- with pictures -- for those who missed it. Or for those who just like pictures.

First off, here's a card of Jay Johnstone.

How Fleer could confuse someone who looked like "Moon Man" up top with someone who looked like Johnstone is absolutely baffling. There are also cards of "Moon Man" featuring sticker autographs that have Johnstone's signature, right there affixed to the card! That is just embarrassing for everyone who has ever made a card, owned a card, laid eyes on a card, played baseball, signed an autograph or went to the moon.

Anyway ...

When the "Moon Man" card -- which was provided to me by Cardboard Catastrophes -- first hit the blogs, the guesses were all over the place from Dodger fans. I guessed Ken McMullen. Another person guessed Len Matuszek. And there were several other names shouted out into the sphere of blog.

But I was never comfortable with my choice.

Here is a card of Ken McMullen:

There are some similarities, but the faces don't really match. And the biggest difference, of course, is that McMullen is a right-handed batter, while "Moon Man" is batting lefty.

Also, the photo of "Moon Man" has a definite early-to-mid 1970s vibe. This card of McMullen came out in 1964.

This is what McMullen looked like in the early-to-mid 1970s. His wore his hair quite a bit longer than "Moon Man" did.

So "Moon Man" is not McMullen.

Strike one.

On to Len Matuszek.

Matuszek, who was a role player for the Dodgers in the late '80s, possessed some similar features to "Moon Man." He has a roundish face, and he batted lefty.

But the time period for Matuszek doesn't match the time period for when the photo appeared to be taken.

And when you compare the two faces ...

They're not the same. Similarities sure, but not the same.

Strike 2.

Someone else brought up Jim Lefebvre, the Dodgers infielder from the 1960s. I had actually thought of Lefebvre when I was looking at the card for the first time, trying to figure out who this non-Johnstone character was.

But it didn't seem like a match.

For starters, Lefebvre hit right-handed. He also has a lighter complexion and blue eyes. As much as I initially wanted this to be the answer, it isn't.

Strike 3.

But never fear.

Apparently we were all headed in the wrong direction. We assumed that the player had to be someone established on the Dodgers, with a resume of past trading cards featuring him as a Dodger.

Did anyone consider ...

... a Milwaukee Brewer?

Tim Johnson came up to the majors with the Brewers and played there for six years before finishing his career with two years with the Blue Jays.

But he didn't begin his pro career with Milwaukee.

He began it with the Dodgers. He was signed by Los Angeles in 1967 and was in the Dodgers' minor league organization for six years before getting traded to the Brewers in the Rick Auerbach deal in 1973.

Do you notice some similarities with "Moon Man"?

Bats left. Round face. Dark hair. Bushy eyebrows.

I believe we have a match!

I can't take credit for any of this. Anthony Hughes of Get That Bat Off Your Shoulder suggested Johnson on this Dodgerbobble post. It's that kind of "out of left field" thinking that I admire. And I wish I had more of that kind of perspective.

(There's also a rather cranky comment from a supposed Jay Johnstone friend on the post).

I didn't think I'd ever get a Tim Johnson card in my Dodger collection.

But now I have.

Thanks to the sphere of blog.

Oh ...

One other card that Cardboard Catastrophes sent.

Damn. Buried the lead again.


Nick said…
I've always thought something wasn't quite right on that Johnstone card. Good to know that I wasn't crazy after reading this post.

At least as far as that card is concerned.
Unknown said…
I don't really know if anyone at Fleer ever had a clue! Good job on the C.I.A. work!
I think we were talking about some Fleer card and then I got blindsided by a vintage piece of art.
jacobmrley said…
That's some mighty good police work there, Lou.

Knowing Johnstone, he knew it wasn't him and he let it go as a goof. A man doesn't get a spacy nickname for being on the straight and narrow.
Dodgerbobble said…
Great post! Mr. Hughes has a good eye. I'm glad he's solved the mystery.
gcrl said…
nice. good to see it pulled all together. now i can close the book on my 2009 post about the card.
Bo said…
Actually its easy to see how they made that error. They probably have Dodger photos sorted by name, which would put Tim Johnson right above Jay Johnstone. Someone clicked on the wrong link in their database and didn't notice. I'm sure we've all done that at work...
night owl said…
We all do that at work. That's why my job has people called Copy Editors!

Fleer, where's your ...

Ah, never mind.

Popular posts from this blog

Stuck in traffic with Series 2

In the whirlwind that has been my life this month, I found myself going absolutely nowhere for a portion of Thursday afternoon. I was in the middle of yet another road trip, the third one this week. This one was for work, and because it was job-related, it became quickly apparent that it would be a waste of time. The only thing that could save it was a side visit to the nearby Walmart to see if I could spot some Topps Series 2. I found it right away, which was shocking as I was pretty much in the middle of the country, where SUVs share the road with tractors and buggies. Who knew that the Amish wanted Series 2, too? The problem was getting back into civilization to open the contents of the 72-card hanger box I bought. The neighboring village is undergoing a summer construction project smack in the middle of downtown. It's not much of a downtown, but the main road happens to be the main artery in the entire county. Everyone -- and by everyone I mean every tractor trailer ha

Heading upstate

  Back in 1999, Sports Illustrated published an edition at the end of the year rating the top 50 athletes of the century for every state.   As a lifelong Upstate New Yorker, I braced for a list of New York State athletes that consisted almost entirely of downstate natives, that is, folks from the greater NYC area and Long Island.   We Upstaters are used to New York City trampling all over the rest of the state. They have the most people, the loudest voices. It happens all the time. It's a phenomenon unique to this state. Heck, there are still people out there who, when you tell them you're from New York, automatically think you're from NYC. They don't think of cows and chickens when they think of New York. But trust me, there are a lot of cows and chickens in New York State. Especially cows.   So, anyway, when I counted up the baseball players that SI listed as the greatest from New York State, six of the nine were from New York City or Long Island. I was surprised all

G.O.A.T, the '80s: 30-21

  I often call this current period of the television sports calendar the black hole of sports programming. The time between the end of the Super Bowl and the beginning of televised Spring Training baseball games is an empty void when I'm looking for something to watch on traditional television. I don't watch the NBA and the NHL on TV holds my interest for maybe a period. College basketball I can't watch until the tournament. This didn't used to be as much of a problem back when I could turn instead to my favorite sitcoms in February. Do you remember when February was "sweeps month"? (Maybe it still is, I don't know). Networks would make sure that every top show aired original episodes that month, no reruns. So you'd always have something to view during the week even when the sports scene was boring. (I know, people have multiple streaming viewing options now. But I find myself going weeks sometimes before I see something I want to view on Netflix or Am