Skip to main content

Best set of the year: 1983

Continuing once again with subjectively ranking the baseball sets of each year since 1981, I've arrived upon the year that may be the biggest blowout out of all of the 30-plus posts I plan to do in this series.

Yup, it's 1983.

I have not come across anyone who doesn't love 1983 Topps. However, if there is someone out there who does not enjoy it, I'm sure this post will unearth that wacky soul. I seem to have a talent for getting people to admit all kinds of weird things in the comments.

But for everyone else, it is apparent that Topps decided it had had enough. Enough playing around with these two pretend card companies, Fleer and Donruss. Enough stooping to their level. Enough looking over its shoulder. It was time to grind them into dust.

And so, leaning heavily on its long tradition, Topps came up with a card set that is probably the most beloved of all of the 1980s. Outside of a fantastic design, Topps didn't change much, but it was enough to reign supreme. And it officially sealed my commitment to Topps. Unlike the previous two years, I barely tried to collect any Fleer or Donruss.

But for the sake of official-dome, I have to pretend that I don't know which company is going to come out on top and do all the necessary and scientific reviews. So join in, won't you?

1983 Topps -- the front

Plusses: A design that remakes the 1963 Topps design. But like all memorable remakes, it improves on it vastly. ... TWO photos of the cardboard subject. ... One action shot and one portrait shot is genius ... The border colors come closer to matching the team colors, although it's not a perfect match for most teams. ... The arrival of the Super Veteran subset, which gave collectors some great old-school photos of longtime current players.

Minuses: Not many. The border colors are off for a lot of teams. Green with the Dodgers. Purple with the Cardinals. Yellow with the Reds, etc. ... A second straight year of separate All-Star cards, rather than noting the player's all-star selection on his base card.

1983 Topps -- the back

Plusses: Well, Topps didn't use green again, at least. Orange makes an appearance for the first time since 1978. ... The silhouette ballplayers are kind of nice.

Minuses: A typical boring back of the 1980s. ... The 1982 Highlights is in timeline format, which is good. But the facts are pretty dry. Straight highlights. ... Collectors don't even get the '82 Highlights if a player's career is too long. ... No position designation on the back.

1983 Topps -- overall

Plusses: Once again, tradition and good old cardboard. ... A large 792-card set again. ... Realization that with a base set filled with action shots, it didn't need the "In Action" subset for a second straight year. ... A very colorful and action-oriented set with a memorable design. ... Wade Boggs, Tony Gwynn and Ryne Sandberg rookies (with Darryl Strawberry in the traded set).

1983 Fleer -- the front

Plusses: The team logo moves from the back of the card (1982 Fleer) to the front, which was a big hit with collectors. ... The card photos are a lot less blurry than in '82 Fleer. ... Fleer seemed to really embrace its ability to take "different" photos of players in this set.

Minuses: Hoo-boy, gray borders. I sure do hate them (or maybe they're beige. Still boring).  ... More odd photos, like this one. Get Sosa's cap in the photo, sirs.

1983 Fleer -- the back

Plusses: A photo on the back! This sure was different in 1983. Unfortunately it was the same picture that was on the front. ... The "Did you know?" facts were kind of neat.

Minuses: Not a fan of vertical backs, for the most part. ... Fleer switched to this format for 1983 and stayed with it for almost the rest the decade, only changing up the bottom. Apparently, it liked what Donruss was doing. But I never liked the sameness of all the backs in the '80s.

1983 Fleer -- overall

Plusses: The first official SuperStar Specials. ... The colored team logo on the front is really the star of the whole set. ... some different pictures that are worth a look even after all these years. ... Rookie cards of Boggs, Gwynn and Sandberg. ... Fewer errors than in the previous two years.

Minuses: If you don't want me to collect your set, make your borders gray. ... Humdrum back that would be repeated over and over in coming years. ... A set that made this collector almost lose interest in anything that wasn't Topps.

P.S.: Did you see the '83 Fleer blog in the New York Times?

1983 Donruss -- the front

Plusses: Well, if I'm comparing the very few differences between '82 and '83 Donruss, I have to say I like the rounded corners better.

Minuses: Here comes the hammer: Donruss basically reissued its 1982 set in 1983. It was an insult to collectors and it should have lost its ability to produce baseball cards for the next five years (which wouldn't have been a bad idea given some of the future Donruss sets). ... I was appalled when I bought a pack of these and saw what they looked like. I think I bought 2 more packs the entire year. ... The script team name on the glove doesn't stand out enough. ... The Diamond King series (which I never liked) wasn't as nice as it was in the 1982 set.

1983 Donruss -- the back

Plusses: Donruss broke out the contract status/how acquired information from the career highlights to display the info better. ... I haven't mentioned this yet: the full name of the player is always fun. And Donruss became known for this.

Minuses: A virtual repeat of the 1982 back, which didn't deserve repeating. Once again, five years of stats is not enough. ... The switch from a blue back to yellow is not good.

1983 Donruss -- overall

Plusses: Zip ... Oh, all right, Donruss had the Boggs, Gywnn and Sandberg rookies, too.

Minuses: Shame on you Donruss for not trying.

And the winner as the best set of 1983 is ...


(Of course)

Ranking: 1. Topps; 2. Fleer; 3. Donruss

Total ranking: Topps-3, Donruss-0, Fleer-0

(The "Best of the Year" Series is now linked on the sidebar).


Zayden said…
Very cool to see this kind of breakdown by year! Looking forward to the next one!
Anonymous said…
'83 Topps is my short list for favorite of all-time. I don't have any problems with '83 Donruss and Fleer, but neither is any thing to get excited about. At least Donruss is lot nicer than the previous effort, I much prefer the glove to the ball and yellow back to the blue one.

My Ballot and Scores for '83
1. Topps 9.9
2. Donruss 5.2
3. Fleer 4.9
Hard not to like Donruss and Fleer since they were available for $3 per box at the 1984 National. As a youngster without much funding, I could still buy a lot of cards.

I still pick Topps over the others.
Fuji said…
What a great year for baseball cards. 1983 Topps was my favorite set for many, many years. 1956 has since taken its place, but the 83 set is still awesome.

It's hard to argue with your rankings:

Gold Medal: Topps
Silver Medal: Fleer
Bronze Medal: Donruss
I agree with most everyone...Topps, Donruss and Fleer. I'd rather bust a pack of any one of these than another pack of 2012 Topps.

Popular posts from this blog

That was easy

   My approach on 2021 Topps, after seeing the cards, empty shelves and the tales of inflated prices, was that I could last the entire year without buying any.   The effort wasn't worth it. I'll just take my Dodgers and go home.   I went to Target once after the release date a couple weeks ago, I don't really remember what day I went, and saw empty shelves and shrugged.   So, move forward two weeks and it's birthday season. Those who have read this blog for awhile know I have a lot of birthdays in my family in March and it's the primary shopping time of the year, besides Christmas. I went to Target yesterday for a few items and I made sure to check the card aisle, just in case. I didn't expect to find anything, but I think you know me by now, I have to buy my first packs of the season if I have the opportunity. It's worth a look. The shelves seemed fairly empty as I approached. But they weren't. When I got there, I saw maybe six or seven 2021 Topps baseb

Reliving my childhood isn't easy

  My favorite part of collecting cards doesn't have to do with collecting current players, rookie cards or prospecting.   Although I pay attention to and buy modern cards and also seek out cards from before I was collecting or even before I was born, none of those cards are why I'm doing this.   The best part of collecting for me -- where the warm fuzzies reside, what I'd save for myself after chucking the rest of my collection -- is any card that was released when I was a child or young teen. I don't think I'm special in that way. A lot of collectors probably feel that way. But, unlike, say, the adult who grew up during the junk wax era, who can open pack after pack of 1990 Donruss and get that nostalgic rush without fear of packs ever disappearing, it's a little more difficult for me. I can go to a discount store a couple of miles away in town and grab some 1988 Donruss packs (I think I can still do that, who knows with the hobby weirdness lately). But there&#

G.O.A.T, the '80s: 20-11

  Big news at the night owl nest today. I subscribed to MLB.TV. Finally, I can watch any game I want this season. I no longer have to suffer with seeing the Mets play the Marlins for the 197th time or grit my teeth through Michael Kay because there's no baseball to watch anywhere else. I can ignore the Yankees for 162 games if I want! And that's what I plan to do. The Phillies-Orioles spring training game is on right now and then I'll search out something even more obscure later. I know, I know, I'm late to the party. That's the way it's been when it comes to entertainment viewing for most of my life. Taking years to land an MLB subscription was more of a cash-flow issue, but when I was younger, I'd miss out on the popular movies all the time because of a relatively sheltered existence. While high school classmates were quoting lines from Caddyshack and Stripes in the lunch room and on the school bus, I knew mostly Star Wars movies and E.T. HBO was the big t