Skip to main content

Shine on, you crazy diam ... ah, forget it


I am still waiting for the last of my Million Card Giveaway shipments to arrive in my mailbox. In the meantime, a new Topps online giveaway is up and humming.

The Diamond Giveaway site is a lot like the MCG site except you earn "digs" for every card you redeem, and those "digs" help you obtain prizes. Don't ask me how, because the "dig feature" doesn't appear to be functioning properly yet. (Topps apparently isn't aware of the concept of a "test run." That's when you work out all the bugs in the system before ... oh, hell, Topps isn't listening anyway).

The Diamond Giveaway appears to have a trade function, too, although that doesn't seem to be operating yet either.

The trade function is the only thing that will make me come back to the Diamond Giveaway site more than, say, twice. I mean, how many people are going to land a diamond ring or a snazzy diamond cut card or a '52 Mantle? Probably only those who figure out how to hack into the site. The rest of us schlubs will get our kicks out of trading for some cards we want. Maybe we'll actually get some of them shipped.

All of the cards that I requested to be shipped in my last MCG giveaway shipment were all cards for which I traded.

Anyway, this is what I got with my first four codes on the Diamond site.

The Lincecum giveaway card redeemed:


An '86 Luis Salazar. I suppose that's the best a pothead can do.

The Albert Pujols diamond giveaway card redeemed:


Yeesh.

The first Jackie Robinson giveaway card redeemed:


Hey, 1975! All right! This is also only one of two Cubs team cards that is not a collection of floating heads.

The second Jackie Robinson giveaway card redeemed:


You can always count on Jackie to redeem cards that are worthwhile.

So, those are the cards that I got, and now I have 4 "digs." I've tried to "dig" once, got stuck, and that's where I am at ... frozen in time with a shovel in my hand. I certainly don't have time to check every 15 minutes and see if the "dig feature" is working. And I really hate using the word "dig" in this way. (Why do you think it's always in quotes?)

Meanwhile, the trade feature needs to kick in because I've already completed sets for three of the four cards I've redeemed, and I will not be getting these particular cards shipped.

Comments

Your first four beat my first four. By a long shot. On a more positive note, I've been able to "dig" three times. It's less than amazing though. Maybe it will get better.
Community Gum said…
Apparently, someone "dug" the Strasburg diamond-embedded 1/1 on the first day. There are like three layers of irony there. -Andy

Popular posts from this blog

A friend indeed

This week has been the kind of week that only late January could produce.

Nothing particularly wrong or terrible happened. Mostly what I felt this week was a sense of spinning my wheels, of working hard without result (or with other people screwing it up), of trying to get things accomplished (while battling a sinus infection) only to have a car noise or a phone call knock me back to square one.

That feeling transferred over to the blog where I probably spent too much time uploading too many photos and conducting too much research and expecting too much in return.

But all of this is a phase. It's the January malaise. I'll snap out of it. It could be worse. I could be dealing with three feet of snow right now instead of the melting three inches that is out there.

And I could be struggling through this week without an envelope in the mail from "A Friend".


That's right, "A Friend".

That's how the return address appeared on the envelope. Just above th…

Degrees of doneness

I just wrapped up my first notable card purchase of 2020.

It was an online order -- from three of every collector's favorite card-buying sites -- and with the exception of three inserts from 2019 and a stray card from 1989, every single card I ordered was made prior to 1980.

That feels good. That feels tremendously good.

I'm starting off 2020 in the right frame of mind.

It's also a good way to put a cork in the 2019 collecting season. There are various ways you can say you're done with the cards from the previous year, call it degrees of doneness, if you will (I order steaks "medium" or "medium well," I don't need anything crawling off my plate).

1. You can be done with collecting sets from 2019. I'm certainly done with that. I didn't try to collect many sets from that year anyway. The 2019 Topps Holiday set and a third of the 2019 Topps Archives set are finished and that's everything I plan to do.

2. You can be done with buying pac…

The lone Ranger

Who is Nick Solak?

Glad you asked.

And thanks to cynicalbuddha for scanning his card into Trading Card Database.

Nick Solak is a former Yankees, former Rays prospect who appeared in 33 games for the Texas Rangers last year.

That, apparently, qualifies him for being the only Texas Ranger to appear in the 350-card base set for 2020 Topps Series 1, a checklist of which was released this morning.

That's right, the ONLY Texas Ranger.

I did the count and the Rangers, with Solak shouldering the entire load, come up a distant 30th behind the 29th-place Orioles, who have a more typical seven cards.

Here is the breakdown by team that I compiled earlier:

Dodgers - 17
Astros - 17
Nationals - 16
Cubs - 15
Athletics - 14
Brewers - 14
Indians - 14
White Sox - 14
Phillies - 13
Angels - 12
Blue Jays - 12
Braves - 12
Padres - 12
Red Sox - 12
Reds - 12
Twins - 12
Yankees - 12
Cardinals - 11
Giants - 11
Marlins - 11
Mets - 11
Diamondbacks - 10
Mariners - 10
Rays - 10
Tigers - 10
Royals - 9
Pirates -…