Skip to main content

Card back countdown: #9 - 1953 Topps

Clem Labine cards on back-to-back posts! It must be Clem Labine week here at Night Owl Cards!

Actually, the Labine card is featured because it's my only 1953 Topps Dodger card. It's here to serve as an example for the No. 9 overall card back in the countdown.

The '53 Topps card back is one of the most original card backs that there is. That's the reason it is on the countdown because overall I'm not terribly enthralled with it. The same goes with the front of the '53 Topps cards. I know that's practically sacrilegious to say here in card blog land with all the love for the painted pictures. But I can only get myself to admire their uniqueness and the effort that went into them. Just can't get into the final product.

Anyway, here is the back:

Among the interesting items on this card back are:

1. The insanely large card number. It's got to be the largest card number ever used for a set. I find it interesting that the dugout quiz references blindness because you'd practically have to be blind not to see that card number.

2. The first cartoons in a Topps base set. I know it's not a cartoon in the traditional sense. But each quiz on each card featured a cartoon-style drawing for the first time. This particular one is interesting, vaguely creepy and politically incorrect all at the same time.

3. The signature overlapping the write-up. Can you imagine if Topps pulled that today? There would be 67 bloggers equipped with torches and pitchforks at Topps' headquarters. It certainly is different. It adds to the overall look of the back, even though it's not exactly user-friendly.

4. The vertical format. After going horizontal in the 1952 set, Topps tried the vertical look. It makes the '53 set stand out. But apparently Topps didn't like it much, because it didn't use a vertical card back in its base set again until 1967.

5. The vertical nature of the player statistics. That's quite unique. I have to stare at the stats for awhile to figure out where things are. I am so used to the horizontal set up with stats. I wonder if any other sets oriented their stats that way.

There are some minor issues with this card back. Readability (black on red is never good) is the big one. But I'm willing to look past them because the '53 set features so many unusual items, especially for its time, that it deserves to be ranked where it is.

The '50s card backs were trend-setters and they should be treated that way.

Best of the set:

When I'm rich and I have more than a handful of '53 Topps, I'll update this. But for now I'm skipping it.

(previous card back countdown selections):


Popular posts from this blog

Stuck in traffic with Series 2

In the whirlwind that has been my life this month, I found myself going absolutely nowhere for a portion of Thursday afternoon. I was in the middle of yet another road trip, the third one this week. This one was for work, and because it was job-related, it became quickly apparent that it would be a waste of time. The only thing that could save it was a side visit to the nearby Walmart to see if I could spot some Topps Series 2. I found it right away, which was shocking as I was pretty much in the middle of the country, where SUVs share the road with tractors and buggies. Who knew that the Amish wanted Series 2, too? The problem was getting back into civilization to open the contents of the 72-card hanger box I bought. The neighboring village is undergoing a summer construction project smack in the middle of downtown. It's not much of a downtown, but the main road happens to be the main artery in the entire county. Everyone -- and by everyone I mean every tractor trailer ha

Heading upstate

  Back in 1999, Sports Illustrated published an edition at the end of the year rating the top 50 athletes of the century for every state.   As a lifelong Upstate New Yorker, I braced for a list of New York State athletes that consisted almost entirely of downstate natives, that is, folks from the greater NYC area and Long Island.   We Upstaters are used to New York City trampling all over the rest of the state. They have the most people, the loudest voices. It happens all the time. It's a phenomenon unique to this state. Heck, there are still people out there who, when you tell them you're from New York, automatically think you're from NYC. They don't think of cows and chickens when they think of New York. But trust me, there are a lot of cows and chickens in New York State. Especially cows.   So, anyway, when I counted up the baseball players that SI listed as the greatest from New York State, six of the nine were from New York City or Long Island. I was surprised all

G.O.A.T, the '80s: 30-21

  I often call this current period of the television sports calendar the black hole of sports programming. The time between the end of the Super Bowl and the beginning of televised Spring Training baseball games is an empty void when I'm looking for something to watch on traditional television. I don't watch the NBA and the NHL on TV holds my interest for maybe a period. College basketball I can't watch until the tournament. This didn't used to be as much of a problem back when I could turn instead to my favorite sitcoms in February. Do you remember when February was "sweeps month"? (Maybe it still is, I don't know). Networks would make sure that every top show aired original episodes that month, no reruns. So you'd always have something to view during the week even when the sports scene was boring. (I know, people have multiple streaming viewing options now. But I find myself going weeks sometimes before I see something I want to view on Netflix or Am