Skip to main content

Card back countdown: #41 - 1989 Bowman


Not a lot of love for 1989 Bowman is there?

First of all, it's pretty damn dull. Secondly, it's too big to store in standard pages. Thirdly, it's pretty damn dull. ... Oh, did I mention that already? Sorry. It's just that it's dull.

Also, 1989 Bowman -- ressurrected by Topps after an absence of more than 40 years -- seems quaint compared to what we know of Bowman today. Bowman is now synonymous with rookie card madness and is basically crack for Strasburg searchers. So, that gives the '89 Bowman set a little bit of charm, at least for me. But only a little.

The other thing that draws my attention to the set are the backs:


Bowman went with backs that were constructed in a way that I had never seen in 15 years of collecting to that point. Instead of the standard year-by-year statistics, Bowman presented the statistics in terms of how a player performed against each team.

At first glance, this was confusing. But once you knew what you were looking at, it became fascinating. I probably had seen this type of breakdown in the Sporting News before, but never anywhere else, and never on a baseball card.


But there you had it -- how a batter or a pitcher stacked up against every team in the league. It was different, informative, and something to take your mind of the "clean" but boring fronts.


Sometimes the backs could confuse you when you would get a card of a player who had changed teams during the past season, like Nolan Ryan here. He's featured as a member of the American League's Texas Rangers.


But the stats display National League teams. That is because Ryan pitched for the Astros in 1988, but there is nothing on the card to tell you that.


And then there were the times when you came across a young prospect. The 1989 Bowman set was filled with players like Ty Griffin.


But Ty Griffin didn't have any major league stats yet --  nor would he ever -- so you were stuck with no information at all on the card back. Bowman wouldn't even tell you how Griffin did in college or high school. No mention of hobbies or anything. Now, that is a waste of some cardboard space.

Bowman continued to present its stats in the team-by-team manner for the next couple of years before abandoning it. Truthfully, the format began to wear on me. I just wanted to know how a player did for each season -- probably because years of looking at stats like that had conditioned me to that format.

But for awhile it was an interesting, somewhat innovative way of presenting stats, and I did appreciate it. It made the set stand out if the card fronts didn't.

Best of the set:


One of the most enjoyable aspects of viewing stats in this manner was seeking out players who performed horribly against the Dodgers. That was good for hours of fun-filled entertainment!

Because of that, I am selecting John Franco as the best card of the set. In 1988, Franco pitched in seven games against the Dodgers, lost twice, allowed eight runs in seven innings, five walks and had an ERA of 10.29. Somehow in there he managed to win two games, too.

(Previous card back countdown selection):

50. 1978 SSPC Yankee Yearbook
49. 1993 Score
48. 1999 Skybox Thunder
47. 2000 Upper Deck
46. 1999 Skybox Premium
45. 1953 Johnston Cookies Braves
44. 1995 Topps
43. 1997 Fleer
42. 1992 Pinnacle

Comments

  1. Honestly, I really don't get pleasure out of this...

    Re: the Ryan card...if you look at the back again (or click on the photo to enlarge it), you will see -- at the left side, just under the stat box, in tiny black letters -- "Played With Astros in 1988." It goes along with that asterisk beside "1988 Team Breakdown."

    But...as a Topps product, it didn't seem they were overly concerned about readability because (in 1989, at least) we didn't need bifocals and special glasses to read them.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I would have collected this set if it was only standard size

    ReplyDelete
  3. The size part killed me, and the fact that size + card stock made these one of the most easily destroyed types of cards in my young collection. I loved the stats though, and weirdly especially the rookie ones where it tells you they have no stats. It is a giant waste, but it's cool when you see words instead of numbers, because that means you've got a XRC or RC on your hands!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Chris ~

    I should have said, "there's nothing APPARENT on the card to tell you that."

    Not even an owl like me could notice that.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Points to Bowman for trying to be different, but bleech.

    ReplyDelete
  6. The boring design was trying to emulate the classic simplicity of the 1953 Bowman set. Unfortunately the photography wasn't nearly as good and the huge gaudy Bowman logo blew the elegant factor of the design.

    As for the backs I like them for one reason - this kind of team by team information was legitimately tough to find in 1989. Everyone nowadays is spoiled by Elias and STATS and Baseball-Reference.com and a thousand other places you can find statistics on the internet. In 1989 I had the Atlanta Constitution, a phone book sized Baseball Encyclopedia and cards. That's it. It's kind of goofy, but really innovative when you think about it. Similar to the scouting stuff they put on the Stadium Club backs, just not as shiny.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Addressing the elephant in the room

A few people have noticed: I changed the way the blog looked with zero fanfare earlier this week.

I've changed my blog appearance, I think, six times now, although one was just a header swap. Just about all of those came with a bit of a warning or explanation.

I didn't think that was necessary this time, mostly because I've been doing this for over a decade, am pretty established, and don't think I need to justify my decisions here.

But also I thought that people were familiar with the general changes in web sites over the last two, three, four years and wouldn't be that affected by it. For the most part that seems to be true -- or, no one cares and they're all looking at pretty instagram pictures.

I've received a couple of questions though and just because I hate the feeling that some readers are lost, I'll explain what I can.

The changes, like many web site changes, are related to mobile phone use.

I've been irked by the way my blog looks on my p…

Mind explosion: a different way to sort

This may have been one of the most tedious blog posts to put together in the history of this blog, but I think it's for a good cause.

The reason I'm not entirely sure is because I didn't have time to carry it out for a few more attempts, got to shovel that 7 inches of heavy wet snow plopped on my estate on Nov. 12th.

Anyway, a couple of days ago, Colbey from Cardboard Collections was sorting his Topps Holiday set by card number and asked a very common question that I've seen come up many times during my blogging career:


 This is always a satisfying question because this is how I organize my sets when I'm organizing by card number. At the top of the post I showed cards from the 2019 Topps flagship set being sorted in that manner -- stacks separated by hundreds first, then you create separate stacks by 10s within each hundreds stack, then finally order each of the 10s by card number.

I've done this since I was a kid and first knew the card numbers on the back me…

Looking at cards with Johnny B.

Over the weekend, I got a chance to express my inner Mike Oz and share some baseball cards with a former major league player.

I'm working on a story for my paper that involves ex-player Johnny Wockenfuss, who is almost a cult figure with fans of a certain age (I am one) and especially fans of the Detroit Tigers during the '70s and '80s.

I won't go into much detail -- at least not now -- because I'm still in the middle of working on it, have more gathering to go, and I get very protective of my stories while I'm in the middle of the process. Got to retain that exclusive, you know.

But I will say that I was able to sit in the home of Wockenfuss, give him the cards that I have of him in my collection, and ask his opinion on them.

Yeah, cool. Way cool.

I have 17 cards of Wockenfuss ("you have a lot of them," my wife said, and I thought "if that's a lot, what is my Hideo Nomo collection?"). Wockenfuss remembered the cards -- "every bit …