Skip to main content

Card back countdown: #41 - 1989 Bowman

Not a lot of love for 1989 Bowman is there?

First of all, it's pretty damn dull. Secondly, it's too big to store in standard pages. Thirdly, it's pretty damn dull. ... Oh, did I mention that already? Sorry. It's just that it's dull.

Also, 1989 Bowman -- ressurrected by Topps after an absence of more than 40 years -- seems quaint compared to what we know of Bowman today. Bowman is now synonymous with rookie card madness and is basically crack for Strasburg searchers. So, that gives the '89 Bowman set a little bit of charm, at least for me. But only a little.

The other thing that draws my attention to the set are the backs:

Bowman went with backs that were constructed in a way that I had never seen in 15 years of collecting to that point. Instead of the standard year-by-year statistics, Bowman presented the statistics in terms of how a player performed against each team.

At first glance, this was confusing. But once you knew what you were looking at, it became fascinating. I probably had seen this type of breakdown in the Sporting News before, but never anywhere else, and never on a baseball card.

But there you had it -- how a batter or a pitcher stacked up against every team in the league. It was different, informative, and something to take your mind of the "clean" but boring fronts.

Sometimes the backs could confuse you when you would get a card of a player who had changed teams during the past season, like Nolan Ryan here. He's featured as a member of the American League's Texas Rangers.

But the stats display National League teams. That is because Ryan pitched for the Astros in 1988, but there is nothing on the card to tell you that.

And then there were the times when you came across a young prospect. The 1989 Bowman set was filled with players like Ty Griffin.

But Ty Griffin didn't have any major league stats yet --  nor would he ever -- so you were stuck with no information at all on the card back. Bowman wouldn't even tell you how Griffin did in college or high school. No mention of hobbies or anything. Now, that is a waste of some cardboard space.

Bowman continued to present its stats in the team-by-team manner for the next couple of years before abandoning it. Truthfully, the format began to wear on me. I just wanted to know how a player did for each season -- probably because years of looking at stats like that had conditioned me to that format.

But for awhile it was an interesting, somewhat innovative way of presenting stats, and I did appreciate it. It made the set stand out if the card fronts didn't.

Best of the set:

One of the most enjoyable aspects of viewing stats in this manner was seeking out players who performed horribly against the Dodgers. That was good for hours of fun-filled entertainment!

Because of that, I am selecting John Franco as the best card of the set. In 1988, Franco pitched in seven games against the Dodgers, lost twice, allowed eight runs in seven innings, five walks and had an ERA of 10.29. Somehow in there he managed to win two games, too.

(Previous card back countdown selection):

50. 1978 SSPC Yankee Yearbook
49. 1993 Score
48. 1999 Skybox Thunder
47. 2000 Upper Deck
46. 1999 Skybox Premium
45. 1953 Johnston Cookies Braves
44. 1995 Topps
43. 1997 Fleer
42. 1992 Pinnacle


Honestly, I really don't get pleasure out of this...

Re: the Ryan card...if you look at the back again (or click on the photo to enlarge it), you will see -- at the left side, just under the stat box, in tiny black letters -- "Played With Astros in 1988." It goes along with that asterisk beside "1988 Team Breakdown." a Topps product, it didn't seem they were overly concerned about readability because (in 1989, at least) we didn't need bifocals and special glasses to read them.
John Bateman said…
I would have collected this set if it was only standard size
SpastikMooss said…
The size part killed me, and the fact that size + card stock made these one of the most easily destroyed types of cards in my young collection. I loved the stats though, and weirdly especially the rookie ones where it tells you they have no stats. It is a giant waste, but it's cool when you see words instead of numbers, because that means you've got a XRC or RC on your hands!
night owl said…
Chris ~

I should have said, "there's nothing APPARENT on the card to tell you that."

Not even an owl like me could notice that.
Matt Runyon said…
Points to Bowman for trying to be different, but bleech.
dayf said…
The boring design was trying to emulate the classic simplicity of the 1953 Bowman set. Unfortunately the photography wasn't nearly as good and the huge gaudy Bowman logo blew the elegant factor of the design.

As for the backs I like them for one reason - this kind of team by team information was legitimately tough to find in 1989. Everyone nowadays is spoiled by Elias and STATS and and a thousand other places you can find statistics on the internet. In 1989 I had the Atlanta Constitution, a phone book sized Baseball Encyclopedia and cards. That's it. It's kind of goofy, but really innovative when you think about it. Similar to the scouting stuff they put on the Stadium Club backs, just not as shiny.

Popular posts from this blog

The pop culture tax

This isn't really a complaint, just something interesting that I've been noticing.

I'm working on wrapping up a couple of '70s-centric sets right now, getting down to those last 10-20-30 cards, and the usual candidates are being evasive.

I wish I could pick up all the stars early in my set-building quests so the end of the build isn't quite so painful but it never ends up that way. The best of the best usually take the most effort. But I expect that.

What always surprises me is some of the other players that end up being the final few.

Take, for instance, the 1977 Kellogg's set that I'm now trying to complete. I picked up three more cards from that set from Sportlots. The Jose "Cheo" Cruz card was one of them.

The other two were Dodgers, already in my Dodger binders but that doesn't help me complete the set now, does it?

I would've liked to add more with this most recent order but most of the other wants simply weren't available. Here…

Vehicles in the background

The 2020 Heritage team set for the Dodgers has been a milestone moment in terms of cars in the background on baseball cards.

If there was a timeline for chronicling cars on cards -- or should I say "vehicles on cards," very few drive a mere car these days -- it would include the 1964 Philadelphia Jim Brown card, the 1973 Topps Luis Alvarado card, another card I'll show in just a moment, and several others.

The latest stop on the timeline would be the Dodgers in 2020 Heritage.

Those are just a few examples. Most of the Dodgers Heritage cards this year feature a vehicle in the background if you look close enough. It has to be the most vehicle-infiltrated baseball team set ever. Even the two short-printed cards that I don't own yet -- Walker Buehler and A.J. Pollock -- each show cars.

I love this and I've documented the reasons why a few times. I am a recovered Matchbox cars addict and vehicles were my obsession as a kid before baseball came along. It also reminds …

The last card

I swear I was already in the middle of constructing this post when Fuji's post about looking for the last card in a set popped up in my reader.

"Crap," I said. "Well, everything's scanned and cropped, no going back."

Besides, this post is more for me than anyone else.

I've long wanted to put together a post highlighting the final card I needed from sets I have completed. It seems that some of those cards are burned in my brain while others are completely forgotten. If I have a post for these cards, then I won't ever forget about these elusive birds. I will simply consult the post!

So that's what I'll do here. Much like this post, I will update it as I complete sets. But this time it will be a much less orderly exercise.

Searching for that last card is what all set collectors have in common. It is what bonds us together. Sure, team collectors must find a "last card," too, but the sets are smaller and therefore the final card isn…