Skip to main content

Card back countdown: #28 - 1970 Topps


I know, I know, I said we'd stay in the 1960s for awhile. But, I'll let you in on a little secret. The card back countdown isn't set in stone. Although there is a basic layout and plan, the individual pieces shift around a bit. There is a lot of fine-tuning going on!

Besides, I consider the 1970 Topps set to be part of the '60s. Although the gray borders were completely different from what a lot collectors knew at the time, and signaled a new decade in collecting, the backs were similar to a lot of the 1960s Topps cards.

No, Alex Rodriguez is "rich."

Card backs in the '60s contained bright colors, and Topps extended that trend one more year with the 1970 set, before entering the "dark-colors card back era" for the rest of the decade.

The 1970 card back is certainly bright, one of the brightest around. It would fit very well with the 1972 or 1975 Topps sets. But Topps chose to pair it up with one of the duller card fronts that it would produce.


I didn't see many 1970 cards when I was a kid. The set came out about five years before I started collecting. But I do remember the first 1970 card that I saw. It was Fred Norman of the Dodgers. I was visiting my friend's house and he had the card.

I remember turning the card over and having to pull my head back at the bright blue and yellow coming off the cardboard. Wow, what a switch from the card front!


The best part of the card back, for me, is how the colors separate each section of the card back. Yellow for the stats and the card number, blue for the vital stats and write-up. And both colors for the cartoon.


I like this cartoon. The cartoon bubble gives you added information!

One drawback to this set is a problem for several sets. Topps dropped the cartoon for players with lengthy careers. Boooooo!

All-in-all, this is a nice card back effort from 1970 Topps (it'll be hard for me to find anything negative to say about the cards from herein out). The two-tone back was certainly different, as different as the card fronts if you ask me.

Best of the set:

My interest in collecting this set is zero, so I only have Dodgers. No best of the set today.

(previous card back countdown selections):

50. 1978 SSPC Yankee Yearbook
49. 1993 Score
48. 1999 Skybox Thunder
47. 2000 Upper Deck
46. 1999 Skybox Premium
45. 1953 Johnston Cookies Braves
44. 1995 Topps
43. 1997 Fleer
42. 1992 Pinnacle
41. 1989 Bowman
40. 1977 Kellogg's
39. 2004 Topps
38. 2004 Topps Total
37. 1992 Topps
36. 1992 Donruss
35. 2008 Upper Deck Documentary
34. 1963 Fleer
33. 1955 Bowman
32. 2006 Topps
31. 1961 Topps
30. 1955 Topps
29. 1967 Topps

Comments

  1. I've read all 720 of the 1970 Topps cardbacks, and an inordinate number of them speak to the player's career in high school, college, or the minor leagues. I don't know if this was a pre-set theme, or simply coincidence, but it got a little tiresome. It has to be difficult to come up with new material every year for so many mediocre players; maybe this was their way around it that year.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Addressing the elephant in the room

A few people have noticed: I changed the way the blog looked with zero fanfare earlier this week.

I've changed my blog appearance, I think, six times now, although one was just a header swap. Just about all of those came with a bit of a warning or explanation.

I didn't think that was necessary this time, mostly because I've been doing this for over a decade, am pretty established, and don't think I need to justify my decisions here.

But also I thought that people were familiar with the general changes in web sites over the last two, three, four years and wouldn't be that affected by it. For the most part that seems to be true -- or, no one cares and they're all looking at pretty instagram pictures.

I've received a couple of questions though and just because I hate the feeling that some readers are lost, I'll explain what I can.

The changes, like many web site changes, are related to mobile phone use.

I've been irked by the way my blog looks on my p…

Mind explosion: a different way to sort

This may have been one of the most tedious blog posts to put together in the history of this blog, but I think it's for a good cause.

The reason I'm not entirely sure is because I didn't have time to carry it out for a few more attempts, got to shovel that 7 inches of heavy wet snow plopped on my estate on Nov. 12th.

Anyway, a couple of days ago, Colbey from Cardboard Collections was sorting his Topps Holiday set by card number and asked a very common question that I've seen come up many times during my blogging career:


 This is always a satisfying question because this is how I organize my sets when I'm organizing by card number. At the top of the post I showed cards from the 2019 Topps flagship set being sorted in that manner -- stacks separated by hundreds first, then you create separate stacks by 10s within each hundreds stack, then finally order each of the 10s by card number.

I've done this since I was a kid and first knew the card numbers on the back me…

Looking at cards with Johnny B.

Over the weekend, I got a chance to express my inner Mike Oz and share some baseball cards with a former major league player.

I'm working on a story for my paper that involves ex-player Johnny Wockenfuss, who is almost a cult figure with fans of a certain age (I am one) and especially fans of the Detroit Tigers during the '70s and '80s.

I won't go into much detail -- at least not now -- because I'm still in the middle of working on it, have more gathering to go, and I get very protective of my stories while I'm in the middle of the process. Got to retain that exclusive, you know.

But I will say that I was able to sit in the home of Wockenfuss, give him the cards that I have of him in my collection, and ask his opinion on them.

Yeah, cool. Way cool.

I have 17 cards of Wockenfuss ("you have a lot of them," my wife said, and I thought "if that's a lot, what is my Hideo Nomo collection?"). Wockenfuss remembered the cards -- "every bit …