Skip to main content

Shrinkage


I haven't always been thrilled by miniature versions of baseball cards. Sure, the 1975 Topps minis were a first love that flourishes to this day. But there have been times when I thought I was getting cheated by smaller cards.

The example that has stayed with me all these years has to do with Kellogg's 3-D cards of the 1970s and early 1980s.

For a collector in the '70s, Kellogg's was the only real alternative to Topps, not that we thought of it in those terms. Kellogg's cards were simply cool, strangely weird cards that you could pull directly out of the box of cereal that sat on the kitchen table. No need to go to a store at all -- well, mom had to go to the store, I guess. Nobody had invented a way for cereal boxes to magically appear on the table yet.

Our only hope for accessing non-Topps cards were through buying the right kind of cereal. It was a pain-staking process. Hostess cards were already out of the question, because "that kind of junk" wasn't allowed in the house. So all our bets were on that box of Frosted Flakes. Through alternate methods of hoping and pleading, we might be fortunate to find a box of Frosted Flakes in the cupboard after a shopping trip.

Then there was the whole drama of which of us three boys would get the card. Oh, the agony.

We ended up ordering the whole set off the side of the box so we'd all get a few cards. But even then you had to wait 6-8 weeks, which we all know is about 14-16 decades in kids' years.

As you can see, we had a lot invested in these Kellogg's cards. So they better well be damn good when they arrived.

For the most part, they were. I had only seen the first six versions of Kellogg's cards (1970-76) here and there. I probably saw a couple '75s and '76s, but had never owned any until the 1977 set arrived.


This is what I knew as the ideal Kellogg's card. A 2 1/8-by-3 1/4 card featuring a color picture of the stars of the day underneath a stretch of ribbed plastic, that combined with the blurry background, gave off a slight 3-D effect.

Since we split the cards three ways among us, no one could have a complete set, but it was a thrill to have even 19 of the cards, and the tradition of ordering them off a box of cereal would continue year after year.


The 1978 set was a particular favorite of mine. And it came in the familiar 2 1/8-by-3 1/4 size. Even though I had seen only glimpses of the Kellogg's cards from '75 and '76, I knew they were also the same size as the ones I was now receiving.

Which is why this was all the more shocking:


The 1979 Kellogg's set was only 1 15/16-by-3 1/4!!! They had shaved off a whole ... a whole .... well, I'm not going to do math fractions at this hour, but they had shaved off a bunch of card!!!!!

I can remember being shocked by the narrower length. I was actually offended, like we were getting an inferior product. The cards didn't seem "cute" or charming to me. It might've been one of the first times that I had ever experienced consumer outrage.

However, a year went by and we were ready to order the cards once again.


And they were even SMALLER. The cards were now 1 7/8-by-3 1/4. The cards practically were shrinking before my eyes!

Today, I consider all Kellogg's cards as classics, and I'm happy that I hung on to the cards that were rationed off to me. But I was so disgusted at the time -- and I'm assuming my brothers were, too -- that this was the last year that we ordered Kellogg's cards off the cereal box.

So I never knew until years later that Kellogg's would move in the opposite direction in 1981 and 1982. In '81, Kellogg's put out the biggest cards it ever produced at 2 1/2-by-3 1/2. The 1982 cards were only slightly smaller at 2 1/8-by-3 1/4.


I also didn't know that Kellogg's had downsized long before, when it first started issuing cards. The 1972 Kellogg's cards were 2 1/8-by-3 1/4 after the 1970 and 1971 cards were 2 1/4-by-3 1/2. If I was a collector in 1972, I'm guessing I would have been infuriated by that move.

Kellogg's also went to a larger, non-3-D card set in 1973 before returning to 3-D and the 2 1/8-by-3 1/4 size that I knew and loved in 1974.

In 1983, the last year of the Kellogg's golden era, the cards returned to the tiny 1 7/8-by-3 1/4 size that they were in 1980. Then Kellogg's cards vanished until 1991.


In 1991 and 1992, Kellogg's put out a series of cards that were produced by Sportflics, which was basically Kellogg's 3-D cards to a younger generation. I have to admit, this Hank Aaron card is a hell of a lot cooler than this scan. I even find it much sharper than a lot of Sportflics regular-issue cards of the time. But I don't think it's 3-D.

It's also a hefty 2 1/2-by-3 5/16 in size. I'm sure it was a lot easier fishing a card that size out of a bunch of cereal than when I was collecting Kellogg's cards.

Today, I hold my late '70s/early '80s Kellogg's cards in higher esteem than any non-Topps cards of that time period. I like them better than Fleer or Donruss or Hostess. And like 1975 Topps minis, they are a true connection to my childhood, no matter what size they are. But I have no idea why Kellogg's played with the size of its cards so often.

I think I just had great expectations of cards then because cards were a bigger deal at that time and that age. You couldn't find them at every Walmart and Target. And even when you did see them at the corner market or drug store, that didn't mean you could afford them.

So when we got them, we wanted them the best that they could be.

And, you know what? They were.

Comments

I think we sometimes fail to recognize greatness when it's right in front of us. It takes a little time to realize what you had...
Spiegel83 said…
I love randomly finding these cards at card shows or card shops. These are my favorite oddball series.
Anthony Hughes said…
I have never seen the Willie Davis - that is a good looking card, I need to get me one for my Angels-Dodgers collection. I have a '75 Messersmith one, but he's a bit worse for the wear and tear - some of those Kellogg's wear well, some don't.
Matthew Glidden said…
Great scans and comparison, I'd forgotten how much difference the card size made to me as a kid back in my pack-buying days.
Captain Canuck said…
one day i will finish off that '82 set I started awhile back.... one day.
How badly warped are these cards? Some years they were so bad they would put 2010 Chrome to shame.
night owl said…
There's some slight curl to some of them, but I've kept most of them in pages so they're in very good shape. A handful -- maybe 4 or 5 -- have the dreaded cracking.
Nothing better than Frosted Flakes in the morning.

Popular posts from this blog

Stuck in traffic with Series 2

In the whirlwind that has been my life this month, I found myself going absolutely nowhere for a portion of Thursday afternoon. I was in the middle of yet another road trip, the third one this week. This one was for work, and because it was job-related, it became quickly apparent that it would be a waste of time. The only thing that could save it was a side visit to the nearby Walmart to see if I could spot some Topps Series 2. I found it right away, which was shocking as I was pretty much in the middle of the country, where SUVs share the road with tractors and buggies. Who knew that the Amish wanted Series 2, too? The problem was getting back into civilization to open the contents of the 72-card hanger box I bought. The neighboring village is undergoing a summer construction project smack in the middle of downtown. It's not much of a downtown, but the main road happens to be the main artery in the entire county. Everyone -- and by everyone I mean every tractor trailer ha

Heading upstate

  Back in 1999, Sports Illustrated published an edition at the end of the year rating the top 50 athletes of the century for every state.   As a lifelong Upstate New Yorker, I braced for a list of New York State athletes that consisted almost entirely of downstate natives, that is, folks from the greater NYC area and Long Island.   We Upstaters are used to New York City trampling all over the rest of the state. They have the most people, the loudest voices. It happens all the time. It's a phenomenon unique to this state. Heck, there are still people out there who, when you tell them you're from New York, automatically think you're from NYC. They don't think of cows and chickens when they think of New York. But trust me, there are a lot of cows and chickens in New York State. Especially cows.   So, anyway, when I counted up the baseball players that SI listed as the greatest from New York State, six of the nine were from New York City or Long Island. I was surprised all

G.O.A.T, the '80s: 30-21

  I often call this current period of the television sports calendar the black hole of sports programming. The time between the end of the Super Bowl and the beginning of televised Spring Training baseball games is an empty void when I'm looking for something to watch on traditional television. I don't watch the NBA and the NHL on TV holds my interest for maybe a period. College basketball I can't watch until the tournament. This didn't used to be as much of a problem back when I could turn instead to my favorite sitcoms in February. Do you remember when February was "sweeps month"? (Maybe it still is, I don't know). Networks would make sure that every top show aired original episodes that month, no reruns. So you'd always have something to view during the week even when the sports scene was boring. (I know, people have multiple streaming viewing options now. But I find myself going weeks sometimes before I see something I want to view on Netflix or Am