Skip to main content

'56 of the month: New York Giants team


Hey, if I'm going to show them all eventually, I have to show this one.

This is the first team card from the 1956 Topps set that I have displayed in this series, and it suffers from the same issue that other team cards from the '50s and '60s suffer from -- you can't recognize anyone!

At least during the '50s, Topps would run a handy identifying key across the bottom, although sometimes distinguishing who is in which row is rather tough. Another issue with this particular card is the IDs aren't from left to right -- like with IDs with 99 percent of photos -- but right to left.

How do I know this?

Well, unfortunately, there were only a handful of African-American major leaguers during the '50s, so when I'm desperate to identify someone out of the mass of similar, blurry Caucasians, I look for the darker skin. Willie Mays is seated third from right in the front row. Go down to the identification key and Mays is the third guy mentioned in the front row. Topps is listing right to left. Geez.

Then, Hank Thompson is standing in the back row in the far left corner. But he is the guy listed last in the photo ID key. Right to left again.

Only the Giants, right?

I don't know if the middle row is right to left or left to right, because it's just a line of white guys. I thought that the "Clubhouse Custodian" listing in the ID key would help, but there are two guys in the middle row dressed as custodians.

In short, I just don't think Topps really intended any of the players to be identified in '50s and '60s team cards. Especially those '60s cards in which the whole team looks like it was photographed from the moon. Topps didn't even list names with those photos.

But, by far, the best part of this team card, and many team cards of that era, is the back.


Look at all that great information! History! Stats! Records! Facts! And a tremendous map of the dimensions of the weirdly shaped Polo Grounds!!

I could spend a day with this card back. And I don't even like the Giants. (Fortunately, the Dodgers have since tied the Giants for most pennants for National League teams -- each have 21).

There were all kinds of good facts on the back of team cards all the way up until -- well, 1975 -- when Topps started putting checklists on the back.

By the early '80s, teams cards had disappeared. They've returned recently -- in various forms. Some even have information on the back, but it's not nearly as detailed as this card is. How cool would it be if Topps put a drawing of the dimensions of each stadium on the back of every team's card?

Something to think about for 2013, Topps.

And, if you want to start running team photos again, think about getting IDs, too.

Comments

Robert said…
258' down the right field line? Man, I could even hit one out of there...
Matt Runyon said…
I think the best job on team cards was done in the 1974 set. The team card had the statistical information and then the team checklists were separate cards. It would be nice to see those again. The information on the back of the '56 team cards is great as well!
dayf said…
I tell you to go to your happy place and you post... a Giants card? *head asplode*

And actually the Dodgers passed the Giants for total NL pennants with 22, but St. Louis tied 'em in 2012.
I look at that like I look at vintage Yankees from that era. I dig 'em because they are awesome vintage cards and don't look at them with the same level of disgust as I do current Giants and Yankees. How awesome was it for the clubhouse custodian to get his place in history on that card? Well, awesome for him anyway.

Popular posts from this blog

Stuck in traffic with Series 2

In the whirlwind that has been my life this month, I found myself going absolutely nowhere for a portion of Thursday afternoon. I was in the middle of yet another road trip, the third one this week. This one was for work, and because it was job-related, it became quickly apparent that it would be a waste of time. The only thing that could save it was a side visit to the nearby Walmart to see if I could spot some Topps Series 2. I found it right away, which was shocking as I was pretty much in the middle of the country, where SUVs share the road with tractors and buggies. Who knew that the Amish wanted Series 2, too? The problem was getting back into civilization to open the contents of the 72-card hanger box I bought. The neighboring village is undergoing a summer construction project smack in the middle of downtown. It's not much of a downtown, but the main road happens to be the main artery in the entire county. Everyone -- and by everyone I mean every tractor trailer ha

Heading upstate

  Back in 1999, Sports Illustrated published an edition at the end of the year rating the top 50 athletes of the century for every state.   As a lifelong Upstate New Yorker, I braced for a list of New York State athletes that consisted almost entirely of downstate natives, that is, folks from the greater NYC area and Long Island.   We Upstaters are used to New York City trampling all over the rest of the state. They have the most people, the loudest voices. It happens all the time. It's a phenomenon unique to this state. Heck, there are still people out there who, when you tell them you're from New York, automatically think you're from NYC. They don't think of cows and chickens when they think of New York. But trust me, there are a lot of cows and chickens in New York State. Especially cows.   So, anyway, when I counted up the baseball players that SI listed as the greatest from New York State, six of the nine were from New York City or Long Island. I was surprised all

G.O.A.T, the '80s: 30-21

  I often call this current period of the television sports calendar the black hole of sports programming. The time between the end of the Super Bowl and the beginning of televised Spring Training baseball games is an empty void when I'm looking for something to watch on traditional television. I don't watch the NBA and I find the NHL on TV holds my interest for maybe a period. College basketball I can't watch until the tournament. This didn't used to be as much of a problem back when I could turn instead to my favorite sitcoms in February. Do you remember when February was "sweeps month"? (Maybe it still is, I don't know). Networks would make sure that every top show aired original episodes that month, no reruns. So you'd always have something to view during the week even when the sports scene was boring. (I know, people have multiple streaming viewing options now. But I find myself going weeks sometimes before I see something I want to view on Netfli