Skip to main content

Vote for Pedro


You probably didn't enjoy voting today.

Oh, maybe you got to talk to your neighbor. Maybe you got a sticker or a baked good. Maybe you felt good about exercising your civic duty, your right as an American citizen. But the actual process, the selecting of the candidates at hand, that probably wasn't much fun.

I voted today. I've also taken three showers today. And a bath.

Look, I may not like our current political climate (not that I've ever been the political type), and I feel a slight amount of guilt over what's been wrought, as every sane American probably should, but that doesn't mean I can't have a little fun with it.

On this day where things could have been a whole lot better, I want you to be able to vote for someone that you want to vote for today. And that's why we're going to vote for Pedro starting tonight.

By my count, there have been 29 Pedros to play in the major leagues. I have cards of 17 of them. I'm going to display a card of each of those 17 Pedros and you will get to vote for one of the Pedros. You will get to vote for the Pedro that you want to vote for.

Pick any reason you'd like when casting your vote. You like the photo. You like the player. You like the card design. You like the team. You like the smile on his face or the lack of a smile on his face. I don't care what reason you choose. It's totally up to you.

The voting gadget is over on the sidebar. It will be up for a week. If there are at least 50 votes total, I will do another post dedicated to baseball-playing Pedros.

All right now, here are the Pedros stumping for your vote. I promise there are no orange faces or pant suits in the bunch:


Pedro Alvarez

Why you should vote for him: Remember when the Pirates were bad? I mean forever bad, like everyone-had-lost-hope-in-1999 bad and the-manager-was-some-guy-off-the-street-named-John-Russell bad. Alvarez, along with Andrew McCutchen, were the first players to give Pittsburgh hope. And isn't that what voting for someone is all about? Hope?

Why shouldn't vote for him: So much for Pittsburgh, he's an Oriole now. And he's kind of lost it. Also, his current beard is weird.


Pedro Astacio

Why you should vote for him: Other than that he spent much of his career with the Dodgers, he is shown here bunting on his card in Wrigley Field. That's kind of charming.

Why you shouldn't vote for him: If you are one of those people with no life and are actively campaigning to rid the bunt from everyone's lives forever, then I can see why you might have a problem with Mr. Astacio's platform.


Pedro Baez

Why you should vote for him: This is the same Pedro Baez who is now a relief pitcher for the Dodgers. A player featured as both a hitter and a pitcher on baseball cards is awesome and worthy of the highest office in the land (of course, Topps hasn't deemed Baez worthy of a pitching card yet).

Why you shouldn't vote for him: You probably experienced in the playoffs how long it takes Baez to throw a pitch. No bills are getting passed if he's voted into office.


Pedro Beato

Why you should vote for him: "Pedro Beato" is fun to say.

Why you shouldn't vote for him: Is it my imagination or do the Mets go through 47 relief pitchers every year and then start the next year with 47 completely new relief pitchers? Beato barely lasted with the Mets, so don't expect him to hang around for long once you vote for him.



Pedro Borbon

Why you should vote for him: Borbon almost never smiled on his baseball cards. This is a man that means business. Also, he's not afraid of a fight. He once tore up a Mets cap with his teeth during a brawl.

Why you shouldn't vote for him: He might be a tad controversial. The cartoon on the back about his hobby being cock fighting could cause an uproar.

 
Pedro Borbon Jr.

Why you should vote for him: Well, if you think Borbon Jr.'s dad is too old and grumpy, you can vote for the kid!

Why you shouldn't vote for him: White Dodger caps should never see the light of day.


Pedro Ciriaco

Why you should vote for him: This would make an awesome "Vote for Me" poster.

Why shouldn't vote for him: We collectors were plagued by Pedro Ciriaco cards in 2010/2011 because he was going to be a STAR. Six years later he still hasn't put it all together. All those campaign promises broken.


Pedro Feliz

Why you should vote for him: He helped bring Philadelphia a World Series title in 2008. Imagine what he can do for you!

Why you shouldn't vote for him: He played a bunch of years for the Giants. He was practically communist.



Pedro Florimon

Why you should vote for him: There needs to be more cards with players on the basepaths. If Pedro Florimon is elected, there will be more cards of players on the basepaths.


Why you shouldn't vote for him: Apparently, this is all he can do.



Pedro Garcia

Why you should vote for him: That's the happiest Pedro alive right there. Don't you want to vote for someone happy? Do you want to vote for someone in baby blue road uniforms?

Why shouldn't vote for him: A .220 lifetime batting average.



Pedro Guerrero

Why you should vote for him: BECAUSE HE WAS MY FAVORITE PLAYER WHEN I WAS IN HIGH SCHOOL, DAMMIT.

Why you shouldn't vote for him: You should vote for him. The end.



Pedro Martinez

Why should vote for him: He's in the Hall of Fame and he's probably the one Pedro here who I could see running for an elected office.

Why you shouldn't vote for him: Well, if you're offended by opinions, you won't want to vote for him.


Pedro Martinez

Why you should vote for him: He's an alternative to the other Pedro Martinez.

Why you shouldn't vote for him: He's an imposter! He's trying to scavenge off a Hall of Fame name! It's an outrage! A political scandal waiting to happen!



Pedro Munoz

Why you should vote for him: If he cares for his bat this much, imagine how much he will care for you.

Why you shouldn't vote for him: The guy is caressing his bat.



Pedro Ramos

Why you should vote for him: The oldest Pedro in my collection. He has experience! He appeared on a 1956 Topps baseball card. That alone should be enough to get him elected.

Why you shouldn't vote for him: He's 81 years old. I don't know how good he'd be at email. Or Twitter. Then again, that might be a reason to vote for him.



Pedro Severino

Why you should vote for him: The youngest Pedro in this group. He's just 23 and will be filled with all kinds of new ideas.

Why you shouldn't vote for him: Speaking personally, I'd have a difficult time voting for anyone who was born in 1993. That doesn't bode well for my voting in the presidential election in 2036. But there you go.



 Pedro Strop

Why you should vote for him: He's a member of the World Champion Chicago Cubs.

Why you shouldn't vote for him: I don't know about you, but I'm sick of hearing about the Cubs. Imagine if they were part of an election campaign.


Those are you 17 candidates for the greatest Pedro of them all. Please report to your polling station between now and Monday, Nov. 14th at 9 p.m. If you need directions: it's over there on the sidebar.

I promise you will feel a lot better about this selection.

Comments

EggRocket said…
I personally can't get enough of the Cubs. Vote: Strop.
EggRocket said…
(Even though I despise the 2016 design)
I was going to vote for P. Feliz, which means "happy" in Spanish, because it is a good name. . . until I saw his face. P. Feliz does not appear to be feliz. So, my vote goes to P. Garcia because he IS feliz. Got it. Also, the 1974 set brings many happy childhood memories.
Jeremya1um said…
I don't know why everyone is talking about voting. The All-Star game was back in July.
But seriously, if this were a real vote, I would probably go for Pedro J Martinez since he helped the Sox win in '04 and was one heck of a pitcher.
GCA said…
Was gonna go Martinez (the first) all the way, but Garcia was one of the two cards I remember as being my first ever. His teammate Eduardo Rodriguez was the "serious one".
RunForeKelloggs said…
"Pinch hitting for Pedro Borbon...".
Section 36 said…
The only Pedro Martinez was an easy choice.

I was way too excited that I was vote #36
AdamE said…
When you say baseball and Pedro in the same sentence it should always be Martinez. Heck, Martinez never pitched for the Sox; every 5th day Pedro pitched.
Fuji said…
I agree with AdamE. Martinez is in a league of his own. Kinda like Kershaw... you just sit around and stare at the calendar until his start day arrives.

P.S. Guerrero is an easy #2. Love watching that guy hit back in the day.

Popular posts from this blog

G.O.A.T, the '80s: 30-21

  I often call this current period of the television sports calendar the black hole of sports programming. The time between the end of the Super Bowl and the beginning of televised Spring Training baseball games is an empty void when I'm looking for something to watch on traditional television. I don't watch the NBA and the NHL on TV holds my interest for maybe a period. College basketball I can't watch until the tournament. This didn't used to be as much of a problem back when I could turn instead to my favorite sitcoms in February. Do you remember when February was "sweeps month"? (Maybe it still is, I don't know). Networks would make sure that every top show aired original episodes that month, no reruns. So you'd always have something to view during the week even when the sports scene was boring. (I know, people have multiple streaming viewing options now. But I find myself going weeks sometimes before I see something I want to view on Netflix or Am

The return of COMC and a ridiculous collecting quest

  For the first time in exactly a year, I received a shipment of cards from COMC last week. I wouldn't say COMC is truly back back. I did pay extra for the express shipping so I wouldn't have to wait however long we're waiting for COMC shipments these days. But the cards arrived in short fashion and it was nice to see something in the mailbox from my preferred online card site for over a decade until last year. I had waited a year to order what was in my cart. I didn't want to be one of those people who paid and then waited nine months for shipment. I mean, what if I ordered them and COMC went under? Those were the kind of questions that were floating in my head last year.   That meant that I did lose a couple of items out of my cart, but no big deal. Nothing in there was anything highly sought-after and I merely replaced whatever I lost with a new version or something else I liked. Many of my collecting interests are not high on anyone's radar, especially 2020 fli

Say hey, you guys

  One of the most significant cards in my collecting history arrived at my door today. The 1956 Topps Willie Mays card ties my formative collecting days to my current collecting existence, confirms what I believe in in this hobby, and realizes dreams from long ago I never thought possible. It also sets a couple of personal records. It is the most I've ever spent on a single card. Yet it didn't hurt my wallet nor cause any regret. In terms of a cardboard acquisition it is about as perfect as it gets. No guilt. All power and beauty. It removes a considerable road block in my quest to complete the 1956 Topps set. It was one of the Big Three that I fretted over for years. "How would I ever obtain that card?" And now it's here. I don't have to remind you that baseball legends from the 1950s (and '60s and '70s) are departing at a rapid pace. That wasn't a top consideration in landing this card. But with Willie's age (he will be 90 in May) and the way