Skip to main content

TMDSIK: 1989 Bowman

(Welcome to part 2 of The Most Defective Sets That I Know. Read, reflect, be grateful that you're not as defective as these sets are. Or at least I hope you're not).


I have a box of 1989 Bowman. In the original box issued that year. I bought it at a department store for super cheap.

The return of Bowman was a big deal in 1989, which is probably why it was such a disappointment. We expected so much more.

But the look is only part of the problem. The problem is THAT look on THAT card size.

1989 Bowman is too ugly to be featured that large.

I was so frustrated when I found out that '89 Bowman wasn't 2 1/2-by-3 1/2 that I have left most of the cards from that set in the very box that I purchased. The vast majority of my completed sets are in binders. But I didn't bother with '89 Bowman. In fact, I cared so little for it, that I broke up the set. I have only about half of it now and I'd have even less of it if I could find people who wanted the cards.

Bowman realized what it had done, and in 1990 it came out with a smaller set, although no less boring.

The size of '89 Bowman cards isn't so huge that you can't find pages for storage. The size is the same as the 1950s Bowman cards. But living in a 2 1/2-by-3 1/2 world for so long, it's too difficult to adjust. I have pages for the '89 Bowman Dodgers and that's it.

The rest are banished to the box, waiting for a release date that may never come.


Nachos Grande said…
Agreed, '89 Bowman is terrible.
Captain Canuck said…
while I do agree that the card size is a wee disconcerting.... any stray Bravos held captive these last 24 years could be loosed to a northern neighbour.
The wrapper was great, the gum was good and everything else was terrible.
petethan said…
Just last night I was sorting what I have of these and I realized that I actually kinda like them, in an island of broken toys sorta way. I've hated 'em for nearly a quarter of a century, so I guess I felt the need to cut 'em some slack. Oh, they're terrible, all right. But there are a handful of cards in the set that actually look kinda nice.
JediJeff said…
I'm going with everyone else - 89 Bowman blows.
hiflew said…
Wow, upset alert. I expected this to be the #1 set on this countdown. I guess that's why it's better that you are doing this countdown because I would be hard-pressed to find 4 more defective sets than this one.
Fuji said…
Lol... looks like I'm odd man out AGAIN. What the heck is wrong with me? Anyways... I threw out all of my 89 Bowman cards years ago... because they were impossible to store.

BUT... I'm in the market for one of these sets. Sort of like... give it a second chance. If I ever end up finding enough stuff to buy on DA to get free shipping, I might add this set to my cart for $10.

Popular posts from this blog

Stuck in traffic with Series 2

In the whirlwind that has been my life this month, I found myself going absolutely nowhere for a portion of Thursday afternoon. I was in the middle of yet another road trip, the third one this week. This one was for work, and because it was job-related, it became quickly apparent that it would be a waste of time. The only thing that could save it was a side visit to the nearby Walmart to see if I could spot some Topps Series 2. I found it right away, which was shocking as I was pretty much in the middle of the country, where SUVs share the road with tractors and buggies. Who knew that the Amish wanted Series 2, too? The problem was getting back into civilization to open the contents of the 72-card hanger box I bought. The neighboring village is undergoing a summer construction project smack in the middle of downtown. It's not much of a downtown, but the main road happens to be the main artery in the entire county. Everyone -- and by everyone I mean every tractor trailer ha

Heading upstate

  Back in 1999, Sports Illustrated published an edition at the end of the year rating the top 50 athletes of the century for every state.   As a lifelong Upstate New Yorker, I braced for a list of New York State athletes that consisted almost entirely of downstate natives, that is, folks from the greater NYC area and Long Island.   We Upstaters are used to New York City trampling all over the rest of the state. They have the most people, the loudest voices. It happens all the time. It's a phenomenon unique to this state. Heck, there are still people out there who, when you tell them you're from New York, automatically think you're from NYC. They don't think of cows and chickens when they think of New York. But trust me, there are a lot of cows and chickens in New York State. Especially cows.   So, anyway, when I counted up the baseball players that SI listed as the greatest from New York State, six of the nine were from New York City or Long Island. I was surprised all

G.O.A.T, the '80s: 30-21

  I often call this current period of the television sports calendar the black hole of sports programming. The time between the end of the Super Bowl and the beginning of televised Spring Training baseball games is an empty void when I'm looking for something to watch on traditional television. I don't watch the NBA and I find the NHL on TV holds my interest for maybe a period. College basketball I can't watch until the tournament. This didn't used to be as much of a problem back when I could turn instead to my favorite sitcoms in February. Do you remember when February was "sweeps month"? (Maybe it still is, I don't know). Networks would make sure that every top show aired original episodes that month, no reruns. So you'd always have something to view during the week even when the sports scene was boring. (I know, people have multiple streaming viewing options now. But I find myself going weeks sometimes before I see something I want to view on Netfli