Skip to main content

Cardboard appreciation: 1981 Topps 1980 NL Championships

(Hey! An actual real, live day off today! No work, no deadlines, no dropping into the office for a sec ... oh, wait, I've got to do that. Here's to getting in and out without the boss seeing. That's truly an accomplishment worth appreciating. Time for Cardboard Appreciation. This is the 93rd in a series):


I'm on quite a 1981 kick lately. There is even a post coming up soon that relates to 1981. I don't know why I'm focused on that year. Perhaps it's the team that won the World Series that year.

I happened upon this card the other day -- probably during another bout of 1981ness -- and was struck by how blue it was. It's always been a favorite because of that.

But it's also disturbing to me because of two reasons.

First -- you'll have to click on the image -- to see this. Look at the two fans on the left-hand side. Their faces have been intentionally blotted out. They're not blurred or anything semi-natural. Instead, Topps just blanked out their faces. It's very creepy.

Secondly, the play being depicted on this card has me confused. I have always figured this picture to be showing the big moment of Game 1 of the 1980 NL Championship Series. Greg Luzinski hit a two-run home run in the sixth inning of a 3-1 Phillies victory over the Astros in Philadelphia.

You can see Mike Schmidt -- who was the second out in the inning -- and Larry Bowa -- greeting Luzinski.

But then there is the guy in the foreground. His uniform number is 8. I have associated the No. 8 from that period of Phillies history with Bob Boone. And I looked it up. Boone did indeed wear No. 8 in 1980.

But Boone wasn't the guy to follow Luzinski in the batting order in Game 1 or any of the games in the NLCS. The guy following Luzinski was Manny Trillo, who ended up winning the MVP of the NLCS that year. Trillo hit fifth in the order in Game 1, Boone hit eighth.

Trillo wore No. 9 according to baseball-reference. (He did wear No. 8 when he played for Oakland and Cleveland).

So I guess these are the possibilities that would explain what I see in the photo of this card:

1. That's not the Luzinski home run in Game 1.
2. That's actually Trillo with a bat in his hands. He wore No. 8 instead of No. 9 in the NLCS.
3. That's actually Boone and he's not coming to the plate, he just decided to run out and gather up the bat because the bat boy was chatting up some 11-year-old girl in the stands.
4. There used to be an umpire standing in that spot, but Topps airbrushed him out and inserted a photo of Boone, not realizing where he batted in the lineup.
5. Baseball-reference's uniform number system is off (yes, I just slapped myself for saying that).
6. The two fans with no faces are going to kill us all and none of this matters.

In reference to the first option, I explored the other possible play it could be, which was in Game 2 at Philadelphia.

In the fourth inning, Luzinski doubled with one out, scoring Schmidt. Luzinski was sacrificed to third by Trillo and then knocked home by a single from Garry Maddox. The next player that came to bat was Bowa, which would make sense in this photo because Bowa has a bat in his hands. The batter after Bowa was Boone. Perhaps he has a bat because he was in the hole.

So maybe that is the play instead of the Game 1 homer that I always thought was on this card. The Phillies actually lost Game 2, which may have thrown me off a little -- why would Topps show a Phillies moment from a game they lost?

I'm still a little confused.

But I've got to get out of here before those faceless fans make their move ...

Comments

Matthew Glidden said…
Like your card research! Perhaps I should start a new series called "Research Appreciation."

I'm convinced this IS that key homer in game 1, for these reasons.

1. Day game shadows (and home unis) mean it has to be in Philly, so only game 1 or 2
2. That's Schmidt and (likely) Bake McBride (both 6th inning outs) greeting Luzinski in front of their dugout
3. This is closer to the dugout than home plate--I doubt Boone is walking up to hit, just moving out of the way after congratulating Luzinski -- Trillo and others higher in the lineup are probably off-picture to the left
4. Another shot of Luzinski batting shows Trillo on deck as #9 (photo at PhilliesPhans.com, halfway down)

Hope that helps put your mind at ease. :-)
night owl said…
You're probably right. I think the fact that Boone is holding a bat was throwing me off.

The other guy with Schmidt greeting Luzinski is Bowa (he wore No. 10), not McBride.
Matthew Glidden said…
Interesting, I thought you meant the FRONT guy (with full whiskers) was Bowa! Wouldn't the bearded player be more likely as McBride or Maddox? (I thought Schmidt just kept a mustache that year.)
night owl said…
The bearded guy looks like a light-skinned player to me. He just looks like Schmidty. He's also too muscular to be McBride. As I remember McBride, he had the diameter of a Festivus pole.
Matthew Glidden said…
I've benefitted from this post just by learning what a Festivus pole is. +1 for the Internet.

Popular posts from this blog

That was easy

   My approach on 2021 Topps, after seeing the cards, empty shelves and the tales of inflated prices, was that I could last the entire year without buying any.   The effort wasn't worth it. I'll just take my Dodgers and go home.   I went to Target once after the release date a couple weeks ago, I don't really remember what day I went, and saw empty shelves and shrugged.   So, move forward two weeks and it's birthday season. Those who have read this blog for awhile know I have a lot of birthdays in my family in March and it's the primary shopping time of the year, besides Christmas. I went to Target yesterday for a few items and I made sure to check the card aisle, just in case. I didn't expect to find anything, but I think you know me by now, I have to buy my first packs of the season if I have the opportunity. It's worth a look. The shelves seemed fairly empty as I approached. But they weren't. When I got there, I saw maybe six or seven 2021 Topps baseb

Reliving my childhood isn't easy

  My favorite part of collecting cards doesn't have to do with collecting current players, rookie cards or prospecting.   Although I pay attention to and buy modern cards and also seek out cards from before I was collecting or even before I was born, none of those cards are why I'm doing this.   The best part of collecting for me -- where the warm fuzzies reside, what I'd save for myself after chucking the rest of my collection -- is any card that was released when I was a child or young teen. I don't think I'm special in that way. A lot of collectors probably feel that way. But, unlike, say, the adult who grew up during the junk wax era, who can open pack after pack of 1990 Donruss and get that nostalgic rush without fear of packs ever disappearing, it's a little more difficult for me. I can go to a discount store a couple of miles away in town and grab some 1988 Donruss packs (I think I can still do that, who knows with the hobby weirdness lately). But there&#

G.O.A.T, the '80s: 20-11

  Big news at the night owl nest today. I subscribed to MLB.TV. Finally, I can watch any game I want this season. I no longer have to suffer with seeing the Mets play the Marlins for the 197th time or grit my teeth through Michael Kay because there's no baseball to watch anywhere else. I can ignore the Yankees for 162 games if I want! And that's what I plan to do. The Phillies-Orioles spring training game is on right now and then I'll search out something even more obscure later. I know, I know, I'm late to the party. That's the way it's been when it comes to entertainment viewing for most of my life. Taking years to land an MLB subscription was more of a cash-flow issue, but when I was younger, I'd miss out on the popular movies all the time because of a relatively sheltered existence. While high school classmates were quoting lines from Caddyshack and Stripes in the lunch room and on the school bus, I knew mostly Star Wars movies and E.T. HBO was the big t