Skip to main content

SSP: Super SP or Stupid SP?


I mentioned in the last post that I received some cards from Royals and Randoms. The star of the package was this short-print of Clayton Kershaw from last year's flagship set. Josh pulled it out of a repack, which doesn't amaze me too much anymore as I've seen all kinds of cool things come out of repacks over the years.

This card is more rare than your average Allen & Ginter/Heritage short-print. It's known as an "SSP" in hobby abbreviation lingo, which stands for "super short-print," although many times I've called it a "stupid short-print."

I am conflicted about these like I am about many modern day inventions in the hobby. On one hand the card is indisputably stellar. I've been a fan of card variations since the late 1970s when I first saw Burger King cards. There is nothing that will turn my head quite like a different photo of the same player on the same design.

But on the other hand -- the stupid hand -- there is the intentional rarity, the selecting of a photo that is quite appealing but limiting it in order to get people to spend more money for it. That kind of cynicism is what killed the hobby that I knew in the '70s and '80s.

I would much rather have photos like this in the base set. Flagship sets are filled with action photos, no doubt fully supported by MLB, which wants to make sure we think these players are superheroes (but with hearts of gold). But growing up collecting in the '70s and '80s, I saw a mix of action, candid and posed photos. I still prefer that.

But in order to get candid photos like players hanging out in the dugout blowing bubbles, I have to shell out extra money.

We did not shell out extra money for blowing bubbles in the '70s and '80s. Heck we didn't even do it in the '90s.




Those are all cards of players blowing bubbles ... in the base set. There was no need to spend $12 to buy one of these cards.

Don't get me wrong, Clayton Kershaw's 2015 Topps base card is terrific.


I called it "beautiful" the moment I pulled it from a pack.

I also known that there are still some candid photos in Topps flagship. I guess I'd just like more of a mix. When I see an SSP of a player blowing a bubble or juggling baseballs or wearing goofy glasses, my mind goes right to the hundreds of closeups of pitchers efforting on the mound, one weird strained face after another with nothing to differentiate the players except the uniform colors (i.e. their superhero cape).

Saving all the cool cards for the super/stupid short-prints just says that Topps (and many collectors now) doesn't care about the base set.

I'll still say variations are cool -- because dammit my brain still says they are -- but I sure wish I didn't have to pay the asking price for those.

Fortunately, with Kershaw's SSP I was able to work out a trade. Writing this blog pays off again.

I got a few more cards in the package to go with Stupid-Super Kersh.


Josh must've been eating a lot of sunflower seeds in the early '90s. These never cease to crack me up.


Woooo. Prospects in logo-less uniforms! That was a bright idea.


A clean white swatch from former hobby sensation Kaz Ishii. If you want to know how little people care about 2002, just look up the prices on Kaz Ishii cards.


This is one of my favorite Shawn Green relics. And I've seen a lot of Shawn Green relics.



Finally, a pocket schedule. From last year's Dodger season. Yay!

This is reminiscent of a Dodger yearbook from my youth:


Note the price on that yearbook.

That's not going to buy any SSPs.

Comments

acrackedbat said…
Paying out the nose for a bubble-bursting sp = wrong.
AT LEAST TOPPS MADE BUBBLE GUM AN INSERT LAST YEAR. SO INSTEAD OF $12, $6, LOL.
Cardboard Jones said…
It's an absolutely glorious card. Would much rather chase after short-printed variations than colored parallels (or sparkly ones, or snowflake ones, or...)
Fuji said…
Cool card. I have no issues with SSP cards... other than the fact that I'll never know how many I've actually given away to students or fellow bloggers, because I didn't realize it was a short print. Then again... my loss is their gain.
Anonymous said…
It's tough to be a team collector and feel the desire/need to grab all the variations...overwhelming!
Commishbob said…
SPs, SSPs, SSSSPs... part of why I don't care about collecting more than a couple cards from any one current set.

Oh, and Program porn!!!! Love it!
RunForeKelloggs said…
I was just telling my younger brother about SSPs last week. To me SSPs were those awesome early 1970s cars that had a rip cord. Pull the cord and it would travel at least 50 yards. Do you remember those? I'd prefer to get one of those again instead of the SSP cards.
Stack22 said…
I really hate the SP/SPP/Variation photos on base cards. I feel like they violate the fragile peace between traditional set builders like myself, and insert chasers. They can have their individually numbered argyle chrome refractor spinwheel cards with DNA slices and jock-straps cut up and inserted into them. That's fine. I don't want them, and if I pull one I can send them to someone who does.

These though feel like base cards, and as a base card, I should have it, and their shouldn't be more than one card per number in a set. It's irritating.
Josh D. said…
Though I live in California now, all the California Sunflower Seeds cards came to me over Christmas from my mom who volunteers at a thrift store. In Iowa. Someone had donated a box and she called me to ask if she should buy them. She gave me the box that had quite a few Seeds cards, some Mother's Cookies cards, some Starline/Long John Silver's cards, and then some miscellaneous junk base. So the California food-release collector decided to donate all his stuff to a middle America thrift store....

Popular posts from this blog

Stuck in traffic with Series 2

In the whirlwind that has been my life this month, I found myself going absolutely nowhere for a portion of Thursday afternoon. I was in the middle of yet another road trip, the third one this week. This one was for work, and because it was job-related, it became quickly apparent that it would be a waste of time. The only thing that could save it was a side visit to the nearby Walmart to see if I could spot some Topps Series 2. I found it right away, which was shocking as I was pretty much in the middle of the country, where SUVs share the road with tractors and buggies. Who knew that the Amish wanted Series 2, too? The problem was getting back into civilization to open the contents of the 72-card hanger box I bought. The neighboring village is undergoing a summer construction project smack in the middle of downtown. It's not much of a downtown, but the main road happens to be the main artery in the entire county. Everyone -- and by everyone I mean every tractor trailer ha

Heading upstate

  Back in 1999, Sports Illustrated published an edition at the end of the year rating the top 50 athletes of the century for every state.   As a lifelong Upstate New Yorker, I braced for a list of New York State athletes that consisted almost entirely of downstate natives, that is, folks from the greater NYC area and Long Island.   We Upstaters are used to New York City trampling all over the rest of the state. They have the most people, the loudest voices. It happens all the time. It's a phenomenon unique to this state. Heck, there are still people out there who, when you tell them you're from New York, automatically think you're from NYC. They don't think of cows and chickens when they think of New York. But trust me, there are a lot of cows and chickens in New York State. Especially cows.   So, anyway, when I counted up the baseball players that SI listed as the greatest from New York State, six of the nine were from New York City or Long Island. I was surprised all

G.O.A.T, the '80s: 30-21

  I often call this current period of the television sports calendar the black hole of sports programming. The time between the end of the Super Bowl and the beginning of televised Spring Training baseball games is an empty void when I'm looking for something to watch on traditional television. I don't watch the NBA and the NHL on TV holds my interest for maybe a period. College basketball I can't watch until the tournament. This didn't used to be as much of a problem back when I could turn instead to my favorite sitcoms in February. Do you remember when February was "sweeps month"? (Maybe it still is, I don't know). Networks would make sure that every top show aired original episodes that month, no reruns. So you'd always have something to view during the week even when the sports scene was boring. (I know, people have multiple streaming viewing options now. But I find myself going weeks sometimes before I see something I want to view on Netflix or Am