Skip to main content

Lazy Sunday ramblings

After three rather intense days of work, I'm ready for a mindless Sunday.

I don't want to spend any more time thinking than I have to, hence the rambling, short nature of this post. And, yes, I did just say, "hence." No, I do not know where that came from. I do not say "hence" when I speak. I would just like to be clear on that.

The first rambling concerns the latest Define the Design segment from a couple of days ago. I decided to put up a poll for the name for the 2010 Topps design. The options are the following, based on people's comments:

  • The swoosh set
  • The wave set
  • The tsunami set (very timely, dayf, and a bit scary)
  • The binoculars set
  • The telescope set

I am partial to the binoculars set, just because many of the photos, especially when the swoosh is a dark color, look like an image as seen through binoculars. Now, as deal said, telescope would be more appropriate, because the card does look more like what you'd see through a telescope (one eye as opposed to two eyes with binoculars). But I've never seen anyone bring a telescope to the ballpark. So I'll stay with binoculars as my favorite.

As for 2010 Upper Deck, I don't know if we're there yet. UD always has to be so difficult because Upper Deck and design are mortal enemies. They're really trying to be forgettable, and they're doing a damn fine job of it. But I'll figure something out.

On a completely different topic, I tracked down another Million Cards Giveaway code. People are probably pretty bored with this by now, but I'm not. Code-entering is now an everyday aspect of life: Get up, take a shower, grab some lunch, walk the dog, enter a code, read the paper. See how seemlessly code-entering fits into the equation?

I thought of saving the code for when the Giveaway Machine starts regurgitating '50s cards again. But I have no patience when it comes to cards. The people who leave unopened packs or -- perish the thought -- boxes of cards in their home for months are absolute freaks. I'm sure of it.

So, I immediately got on the site, scanned the "recently unlocked cards," saw there was nothing from the junk wax era -- just 1970s and a couple early '80s items -- and took the plunge.

Here is what I redeemed:

Awesome. Something from the 1960s. Although I hope the card that's sent to me isn't this miscut.

This card is actually from my least favorite '60s set, but you can't go wrong with the mug on that photo. Look at those eyes. He's trying to intimidate you with his squinty eye and hypnotize you with his ocean blue starey eye.

I've never heard of Jerry Buchek. He was a regular for just one year, the starting second baseman for the Mets in 1967. This is the last card of his career.

My luck is starting to turn with the last two redemptions. I may ask to get some of these cards shipped yet. Lord knows, I deal with enough Mets collectors. Or maybe I can get one of those anonymous traders on the Million Giveway site to give me a Koufax for Buchek.

OK, one other thought and then I'm hitting the sack.

I'm thinking of putting Night Owl Cards on Facebook.

I don't have a Facebook account of my own. It doesn't appeal to me for what most people I know use it for -- to communicate with old friends or co-workers, etc. And I certainly don't want it so I can update people on what I ate or saw on TV. I believe that's called "pathetic."

But I'm surrounded by people who use it, and it seems that as another outlet for the blog, it would work and maybe give me a few more ideas.

What do you think? How many of you have your blogs on Facebook? How's it working for you?

Anyway, those are my babblings for now.

I'll be back with a more structured post soon. In fact I'm about to update one of my more popular posts.

But first: Sleep.


Matt Runyon said…
My 1976 blog is on Facebook but I don't think it gets many hits there (I don't keep track).
Dinged Corners said…
We don't have a Facebook account or any social networking thing. But then again neither do we tweet or text or watch cable/satellite TV. We resist whenever corporate entities say "You need this." Except of course if the corporate entity is, like, Topps.

You're such a good writer, the way you stay socially connected is to write! And you get a great response.

Then again, to each his own, I don't mean to rail against any of it.
Last summer I attended our 40th HS reunion.Most of my classmates were on Facebook.My youngest son is on Facebook.I was not, until the reunion.I look at to see what some of the people are up to, but rarely make any posts.Maybe a comment once in a while.I see card sites there but I generally skip over them because I read them here.I don't tweet, I don't even have a cell phone! I do watch the MLB channel on cable though.
dayf said…
No, I do not have the power to cause earthquakes. Not even after some of my three-bean fire chili.

Look at that card up there. That Dodger logo is totally surfing that monster wave. No binoculars have a corporate logo etched into the bottom corner.
Sean Benton said…
I've been on facebook for 5 years and can't say I've ever really seen a consistent blog on there. The built-in notes application doesn't allow for images or customization and posting on your profile doesn't serve the same purpose as a blog. I would suggest creating a fan page on facebook, where you could link to new posts here.
Anonymous said…
Cant go wrong with vintage cards! But yeah, I have a facebook link on my blog, but thats just to friend me, not really promoting my blog, more like my blog promoting my facebook!
Anonymous said…
I've linked my blog to my Facebook account, so new posts show up in Faceblook, but that's more as a convenience to my friends there than anything else.

FYI, a telescope image would be upside down, so that would be RIGHT OUT.
capewood said…
I have a Facebook account for friends and family. I don't think putting the blog on FB would be a good idea. I do put links to my blog on occasion when I think my friend would be interested in something I blogged.
I think tsunami fits when it's a blue wave...but not so much with the other colors. HOWEVER, I do NOT wish to cross Dayf if he's been eating three-bean fire chili.
GOGOSOX60 said…
How about the "Police give away team set" design....

Popular posts from this blog

Cards I'll never buy

I started thinking about the topic of this post even before I saw this image today on the Twitter page of @halocline_gg.

I immediately breathed a sigh of relief upon seeing the photo. This hobby disaster had nothing to do with me.

To run into a sign like this -- if it involved baseball -- would be deflating. And that's why I was relieved that it was targeting a product -- and collectors -- that are so far removed from the way I collect.

Here are the things that I don't care about concerning 2019-2020 Optic Mega Boxes:

1. It's Panini
2. It's basketball
3. It's basketball players on Panini cards.

There are few cards that I know I will never buy, but current basketball cards are definitely in that category.

And here's the exercise: since I have a wide variety of card interests and lots of things that I would buy, I tried to think of cards I would never buy. Ever. Not on a whim. Not on a dare. Never.

I came up with a few. Let's start with the topic du jour:

1. Current b…

Where pages go to die

One thing that I fail to do when trading in this hobby is make the best use of my PWEs and my extra pages.

When sending out a PWE, I usually pack maybe 3 or 4 cards into penny sleeves and fold some paper around it so the cards don't move around and then ship it off.

Meanwhile, people are stuffing up to 12 cards into one-third of a nine-pocket page and shipping it in that same PWE. What's wrong with me?

I don't know, I guess I don't have a lot of extra pages around right now. But that's not the main reason. The main reason is I don't think of it. And when someone sends me one of those cut-up pages, I don't keep them so I can be just as efficient when I send out PWEs.

Yup, those cut-up pages just get chucked. I'm the place where pages go to die.

I've got to stop that. I have a card room and a card desk and a card drawers full of supplies. I love my card drawer full of supplies. All I need to do is add those cut-up pages to the drawers and I'll be…


I've been feeling a little guilty lately about neglecting my 1980s card needs.

All of my recent purchases have been related to vintage or Dodgers from the 1990s to the present. The poor '80s have been ignored.

I don't have anything against the '80s, not at all. It's pretty much my favorite decade. While I prefer the '70s for cards and the '90s for god awful situations, the '80s are the overall winner. I continue to live in them when it comes to music, recounting past girlfriends, and the best memories of all-time.

So why don't I gravitate toward the cards from the '80s?

Well, probably mostly because I have so many of them. All the Topps sets are complete. And most of the Dodgers team sets from that time were finished off long ago. My favorites from Donruss and Fleer are done, too.

That leaves the sets that aren't the greatest but do showcase the players that I grew up with, and that's why I'm still trying to complete some Fleer sets…