Skip to main content

A 2010 Topps blaster and a blog crisis

The other reason that I wasn't heartbroken that I couldn't make it to the card show was that I finally found 2010 Topps in my lonely, abandoned outpost.

Yay for me!

Anyone can find 2010 Topps cards living in a civilized setting. That's no achievement. But finding 2010 Topps cards in a place where you get a foot of snow in one day and the kids still have to go to school? That's worth an award. Also, I would like to note that I found them a full week before I found them last year (of course, that's because Topps released its set earlier this year, but them's details).

The gravity feeder at my Target was jammed full. But instead, I went with the one blaster that was available. I know, I know. I said last post that I wouldn't get any blasters this year. Well, this is an exception because I bought this blaster with money meant for the card show. Those dollar bills were destined for cards. So it's all good.

I am going to show the entire blaster contents, but first a word about my blog crisis.

If you read the Play at the Plate blog, you'll remember that Brian posted about scanner issues recently. (By the way, he is holding a contest. See how smoothly I fit that in here?) In the post, he mentioned that he had used up about 11 percent of his available photo space. Some people commented that they didn't know there was a limit on uploading scanned photos. Well, I knew. Because I was dealing with that very issue at that exact moment.

My love for featuring as many scans as possible on posts had come back to haunt me. Last week, when I was detailing the dayf bipping, I tried to upload the Hershiser bipfest scan and blogger told me I had no more space available. After a period of puzzlement -- because all things computer puzzle me -- I figured out that there is a limit to how many scans can be uploaded and stored in my Picassa Albums. You can purchase more space. It's not much -- 5 bucks, I think. But ever since, I've been doing blog maintenance trying to free up more space.

I'm sure I'm going to end up paying because there's no way I can free up more space on my own -- that is unless someone knows of a way around this. I have two blogs, after all. I'm curious whether any veteran blogger has encountered this.

Anyway, this has forced me to rethink my posts. I'll probably be scanning fewer cards for each post, and limiting trade posts to a few key items. I don't want to do that, but actually it will be a positive. I won't spend as much time posting and it'll force me to be more selective and concise. That's not a bad thing.

So, with the contents of this blaster, I will be showing just one card per pack. That's 10 cards in all. And that amount will be the high end for future posts. No more 20/30-card posts. Sorry.

OK, first cards of 2010 purchased by MESELF:

Pack 1

189 - Adrian Beltre, Mariners
326 - Tyler Colvin, Cubs, rookie card
260 - Yankees franchise history
PP-8 - Justin Morneau, peak performance insert
FCTTT3 - Hanley Ramirez, toppstown
313 - Jason Kubel, Twins
246 - Leo Nunez, Marlins
50 - Zack Greinke, Royals

Notes: There are only eight cards per pack in blasters ... Beltre is the first card I pulled so I have to show that. ... The Peak Performance insert series is way lame. It's practically a Toppstown card. Same deal.

Pack 2

249 - Jon Niese, Mets
242 - Bobby Jenks, White Sox
215 - Max Scherzer, Diamondbacks
292 - Tommy Manzella, Astros, rookie card
CMT43 - Tony Gwynn, Cards Your Mom Threw Out insert series ('94)
TR6 - Justin Upton, Diamondbacks, Turkey Red insert series
TTT5 - Evan Longoria, toppstown
113 - Willy Taveras, Reds

Notes: Nobody was throwing out cards in 1994. Nobody. ... I have no idea why the Hanley Ramirez toppstown card had an FC in its card number and the Longoria did not. They look exactly the same. ... Bobby Jenks needs to get rid of that thing on his chin immediately. If he's trying repulse everyone, he's doing a fantastic job.

Pack 3

295 - Kevin Youkilis, Red Sox
34 - Michael Dunn, Yankees, rookie card
197 - Indians team card
TOG16 - Bo Jackson, Tales of the Game insert
LL21 - Hank Greenberg/Ryan Braun, Legendary Lineage insert
TTT12 - Miguel Tejada, toppstown
247 - Andre Ethier, Dodgers
179 - Ryan Spilborghs, Rockies

Notes: Woo-hoo, first Dodger! ... The Youkilis card is very interesting. Nice to see some young ladies in the audience, if that really is an actual audience from that game. One never knows. ... The Tales of the Game insert set rocks. The Legendary Lineage insert set sucks. It puts me to sleep.

Pack 4

22 - Anthony Swarzak, Twins
163 - Josh Butler, Brewers, rookie card
HOTG25 - First MLB game played in Japan, History of the Game insert series
WTWY-AP - Aaron Poreda, When They Were Young insert series
TTT18 - Vladimir Guerrero, toppstown
257 - Bobby Crosby, Athletics
201 - Tigers team card
158 - Jeff Niemann, Rays
Topps Attax ad

Notes: I'm on the fence on the History of the Game insert set. It looks dull, but the concept might work. ... The Tigers team card features two guys no longer with the team -- Granderson and Rodney. ... There are a lot of players in this set that I've never heard of before.

Pack 5

175 - Josh Hamilton, Rangers
236 - Andrew Bailey, Athletics, AL Rookie of Year
145 - Justin Upton, Diamondbacks
CMT54 - Ryan Howard/Cole Hamels prospects Cards Your Mom Threw Out insert series ('05)
689 - Ryan Howard/Cole Hamels prospects 2005 reprint
PP1 - Albert Pujols Peak Performance insert
TTT25 - Manny Ramirez, toppstown
252 - Ronny Cedeno, Pirates

Notes: I got both the Mom Threw Out card and the reprint variation card back-to-back. Getting a reprint of a 5-year-old card is completely ridiculous. The card is virtually the same as the actual 2005 Topps card, so I wonder how many sellers will try to pass this card off as the real thing. ... The Bailey card has the AL Rookie of the Year mention stamped in foil on his card. I don't know if Bailey has a seperate base card in the set or if this is his base card.

Pack 6

93 - Joe Nathan, Twins
148 - Cody Ross, Marlins
273 - Pat Neshek, Twins
287 - Jhonny Peralta, Indians
72 - Brewers franchise history
TR17 - Derek Lee, Cubs, Turkey Red insert
TT9 - Roy Halladay, toppstown
279 - Randy Wolf, Dodgers

Notes: The Wolf card is strange. Not only does the photo show the back of him, but he's wearing a red cap. Not a good photo choice. ... My inability to pull Twins has been cured by this blaster.

Pack 7

15 - Bobby Abreu, Angels
40 - Josh Johnson, Marlins
311 - Jose Valverde, Astros
LL8 - Tris Speaker/Grady Sizemore, Legendary Lineage insert
TT6 - Ichiro Suzuki, toppstown
70 - Cole Hamels, Phillies
55 - Manny Ramirez, Dodgers
105 - Madison Bumgarner, Giants

Notes: I do believe the Ramirez card is a night card. ... At least the Lineage card features players from the same team. ... The Valverde card is awesome. I'll have to show it some time. But not now. Photo limit, you know.

Pack 8

88 - Jerry Hairston Jr., Yankees
143 - Omar Vizquel, Rangers
263 - Placido Polanco, Tigers
269 - Checklist, Yankees Rodriguez, Jeter & Cano
CMT48 - Ivan Rodriguez, Cards Your Mom Threw Out insert ('99)
TMC-3 - Million Card Giveway code card (Gibson '63 card featured)
TTT23 - CC Sabathia, toppstown
152 - Nyger Morgan, Nationals

Notes: A-Rod's uniform pants are WAY too tight. I'll leave it at that. ... I am very curious to see what card I unlock with this Millon Card Giveway. It better not be anything from the late 1980s.

Pack 9 (Throwback-gray back cards)

193 - Sharon Martis, Nationals
323 - Jim Thome, Dodgers
196 - Ian Desmond, Nationals, rookie card
265 - Angels team card
CMT9 - Carl Yastrzemski, Cards Your Mom Threw Out ('60)
TMC2 - Millon Card Giveaway code card (Gary Carter '78 card featured)
TTT2 - David Wright, toppstown
146 - Yunel Escobar, Braves

Notes: Two throwback packs per blaster. That's a good or bad thing, depending on your perspective. ... Very pleased to get the Thome Dodger card. ... The Yastrzemski Mom Threw Out Card is not a gray back card. ... Another code card. I'll see what happens on February 15th.

Pack 10 (throwback-gray back cards)

60 - David Wright, Mets
135 - Ryan Dempster, Cubs
322 - Travis Buck, Athletics
329 - Rockies franchise history
CMT36 - Bo Jackson Cards Your Mom Threw Out insert series ('87)
PP37 - Hanley Ramirez, Peak Performance insert series
FCTTT19 - Justin Upton, toppstown
103 - Daniel Murphy, Mets

Notes: OK, I figured out the FC notation on the Toppstown cards. Those are the cards with gold backgrounds. I don't know what FC stands for. ... The Wright card is very cool.

My overall thoughts:

-- Too many inserts. The Tales of the Game series is excellent and I was disappointed to get only one. I can live with a couple of the other insert sets, too. But Lineage and Peak Performance are wastes.

-- The design is very colorful, which I love. The large logos are awesome. They make the whole card. (If you don't know already, Major League Baseball filed a lawsuit today against Upper Deck saying UD is continuing to use MLB logos even though it no longer has a licensing agreement. You knew this was coming. Upper Deck, I could never figure you out. Now, more than ever).

-- I wish they would have scrapped the foil. It's easier to read than last year, but this design reminds me of an old-school set, and no old-school set has foil.

-- The photos seem to be consistently good like last year. In fact, when I compare the two sets, there are a lot of similarities. I may like this set even better.

-- Card backs are better than last year.

Overall, I think this set is slightly better than last year's Topps set. That's saying something because I really liked last year's set a lot. For those who feared that Topps would mail it in, as the sole MLB licensee, I don't think that has happened. This set won't blow you away. But it's a basic flagship set, so you shouldn't be looking for your mojo jollies here.

I still don't know if I'll be collecting the whole set like last year. I'll see how many cards I accumulate here and there. If I find I'm close to finishing it off, then I'll finish it off.

Oh, and here's this thing:


On the good side, I did get five Dodger cards.


Ben G said…
I almost bought a blaster instead of packs the other day (and i'm up to like.. 35 packs now.) I was looking at the box in line and saw the "8 cards per pack line" printed all small on one side.
10 packs x 8 cards? 80 cards for 20 bucks and some of those are parallel versions that I can't put in my set. Boo.
20 bucks gets me 10 packs from the gravity feeder and they have 12 cards per pack. .. 120 cards vs 80 cards. Makes those cheapo patch cards not so worth it. When you are getting 12 cards per pack the 3 insert cards per pack dont seem excessive either. Getting the Target exclusive mini red back cards occasionally is nice too.
Anonymous said…
The only (free) option I can think of for your photo issue it to upload them to a different account. Sign up for a Photobucket account and put your scans there... it will delay the issue for another year or two, though it won't be as convenient to include images in your posts.

So there are actually cards on those million card giveaway things? Now I feel compelled to try to get the Gary Carter one, even though I don't normally stress over his post-retirement issues.
H-way H-way too many inserts. In my blaster, I got a "Yo Mama" card ... 2006 Alex Gordon. Dumb.
capewood said…
I finally found some blasters at my local Target and bought 2. I'll probably feature when I'm done my card show posts (late next week maybe). I like that they've included the packs of throwback cards in with the regular rather than having to buy a whole other box of them.
Chris Crook said…
You could just scan several cards together to make one photo, instead of posting each card individually. That would save lots of space.

Got a blaster at K-Mart today. I kind of like all the inserts- at least they are not SPs. (are there SPs in the base?)
Captain Canuck said…
scanning multiple cards together won't help, as it's space, not scan count, that Picasa goes by. The larger the pic, the more space it'll take.

the only way around I've found is to flip the ole blog to multiple users. Picasa is user based, not blog based. So starting next week, we could have posts by "night hawk" and you'll get a brand new start on picasa.

use your "night owl" account for perusing everyone else, and leaving comments.

better than paying $5... but I think for $5 you get a LOT more space. Like 10x what you have now or something.
IkesCards said…
You can try flickr as well. No size or count limits. You'll get more featurs if you pay for the pro accounts but even if you don't, your files will still be there with no limits.
Mark Aubrey said…
$5 at Picasa gets you 20GB for a year. Currently you get 1GB for free. That's a cello pack of cards at the Wal-Mart or shipping for nine cards through COMC.

Or a Big Mac supersized meal with a shake and some apple pies. (I don't really know McDonald's prices.)

Or maybe a pack of Camels. (I don't know smoke stick prices either.)

To avoid the hassle of multiple accounts, spend the five bucks.
On that Wolf card, do they wear the Red hats on July 4th or to honor 9/11? That is what is sticking in my mind. I got ya down for the contest mention. Thanks.
Justin Drummond said…
The "FC" stands for "First Class" because those cards are heading to ToppsTown in leather seats with all the liquor they please. The others are riff raff and sit in the back by the lavatory.
madding said…
Not that you probably want to hear this, but I think your issue with running out of space has more to do with the file size of the images your'e uploading and less to do with the quantity. If dayf is only at 35% after all this time, well...

I hate the stupid USA Patriotic Holiday caps that teams have worn the past two seasons (Randy Wolf's card.) I wish they would go away, but I bet they won't.
steveisjewish said…
I say spend a few bucks - I always loved the million card posts - something I never had the patience to do!
SPEND THE MONEY!!! We can have a Night Owl fundraiser if ya like...The bazillion scans are totally imperative to your posting style. They MUST remain! On the start of the post... I dont know if I live in a civilized area, but it isn't snow covered and I STILL have not seen 2010 Topps. I didn't like them at first, but they have grown on me and I am DYING to get my mitts on 'em!
night owl said…
Verdict: A Lincoln will be spent. Thanks all.
Community Gum said…
That there are no red/blue-backs in the blasters kind of annoys me. Now I have to decide between pack-searched racks/wax with popular continuity inserts or the blasters with the semi-popular throwbacks and patches! Decisions!

Also, we have that Carter you're looking for. Check our site for a pic!

Popular posts from this blog

Cards I'll never buy

I started thinking about the topic of this post even before I saw this image today on the Twitter page of @halocline_gg.

I immediately breathed a sigh of relief upon seeing the photo. This hobby disaster had nothing to do with me.

To run into a sign like this -- if it involved baseball -- would be deflating. And that's why I was relieved that it was targeting a product -- and collectors -- that are so far removed from the way I collect.

Here are the things that I don't care about concerning 2019-2020 Optic Mega Boxes:

1. It's Panini
2. It's basketball
3. It's basketball players on Panini cards.

There are few cards that I know I will never buy, but current basketball cards are definitely in that category.

And here's the exercise: since I have a wide variety of card interests and lots of things that I would buy, I tried to think of cards I would never buy. Ever. Not on a whim. Not on a dare. Never.

I came up with a few. Let's start with the topic du jour:

1. Current b…

Where pages go to die

One thing that I fail to do when trading in this hobby is make the best use of my PWEs and my extra pages.

When sending out a PWE, I usually pack maybe 3 or 4 cards into penny sleeves and fold some paper around it so the cards don't move around and then ship it off.

Meanwhile, people are stuffing up to 12 cards into one-third of a nine-pocket page and shipping it in that same PWE. What's wrong with me?

I don't know, I guess I don't have a lot of extra pages around right now. But that's not the main reason. The main reason is I don't think of it. And when someone sends me one of those cut-up pages, I don't keep them so I can be just as efficient when I send out PWEs.

Yup, those cut-up pages just get chucked. I'm the place where pages go to die.

I've got to stop that. I have a card room and a card desk and a card drawers full of supplies. I love my card drawer full of supplies. All I need to do is add those cut-up pages to the drawers and I'll be…


I've been feeling a little guilty lately about neglecting my 1980s card needs.

All of my recent purchases have been related to vintage or Dodgers from the 1990s to the present. The poor '80s have been ignored.

I don't have anything against the '80s, not at all. It's pretty much my favorite decade. While I prefer the '70s for cards and the '90s for god awful situations, the '80s are the overall winner. I continue to live in them when it comes to music, recounting past girlfriends, and the best memories of all-time.

So why don't I gravitate toward the cards from the '80s?

Well, probably mostly because I have so many of them. All the Topps sets are complete. And most of the Dodgers team sets from that time were finished off long ago. My favorites from Donruss and Fleer are done, too.

That leaves the sets that aren't the greatest but do showcase the players that I grew up with, and that's why I'm still trying to complete some Fleer sets…