Skip to main content

They're real and they're unspectacular

I've used the term "digital cards" in the past. I've decided I'm not going to do that anymore.

Because there is the phrase "digital cards," Topps has now come up with the term "physical cards" to describe, you know, actual cardboard cards. That is too weird. People don't play a video football game and then play a game in the park and call it "physical football" (unless the game gets physical). I'd hate to see where that would lead. ("I took my physical dog for a walk in the physical park where he physically pooped on some physical grass.").

Those pieces of cardboard you can touch, scuff and ding are simply cards. No adjective needed. And those "cards" that you see on your phone are images of cards. Sure, they're collectible. I won't argue that point. Collect all the images you want. But you're collecting images of cards. The cards I can touch without a screen between me and my fingers are real, honest to goodness cards. If you want to separate them with terms, the cards I can feel are "real cards." I won't be mean and call the ones on your phone "fake," but they're screen images and that's all until I can experience that tactile sensation.

This new definition of the cards that I've collected for close to half a century came about because Topps has issued a set based on its digital collectible game, Topps Bunt. These real cards mimic the images created on the Topps Bunt app. I can't tell you more than that because I can't get into collecting pictures of players on my phone when there are real cards to collect.

But I am pleased that there are finally cards to collect of those images. I was completely surprised by this. I had no idea this set was coming out -- probably because I don't pay attention to the Topps Bunt thingy. Then I started seeing a couple people opening the product and, lo and behold, there the cards were in my very own town.

Topps Bunt is very affordable, and you'll see why in a minute. Paying $2.99 for 24 cards is a big plus in my mind and in those of a lot of collectors. And it's an easy set to complete at 200 cards. I realize the intent of this set is to intermingle the tangible with the digital, advertise the app to those who collect real cards, etc. But I'm approaching it from the traditional angle that I prefer, so that's how I'll continue to look at it here.

There is your typical base card. I will say right off that these cards look better in scans than they do in person. That probably makes sense as I'm assuming these images on the cardboard cards come straight from the Bunt app. But they work a little better in the virtual world than they do in reality.

The star of this set is the giant logos in the background. This has always been the appeal of online cards from eTopps to Topps Bunt. I've always wanted giant logos to appear on actual cards and finally they have. This is the No. 1 selling point.

As for the rest of the look of the set, it's passable. The formica countertop background for the name, team and position comes in ghastly gray. If you've been paying attention you know that I despise gray as a primary color for sets. It makes the set look generic. And it hurts the appeal of this set for me.

You'll also notice the smoke is back and the cards have an overall appearance of the player playing in front of a screen door (it is not quite as apparent when you have the cards in hand).

When I opened my two hanger packs, I noticed a lot of cards from the same teams.

Four Tigers in one pack. That same pack also was heavy on Rangers, Yankees and Red Sox.

All the Sox help me point out something else:

The logo changes depending on how recently the player has played. That's kind of cool, and reminiscent of 2011 Topps Lineage, which did the same thing (although I think it kept to two images for teams).

The Lost Collector, who busted a box of this product and sent me a bunch of Dodgers from the set, also mentioned Lineage, and it's a good comparison. Not only is each set the same size but the backs of both sets are very mundane with only a short write-up (Bunt has vital stats, while Lineage did not).

In fact, to me, this set looks like Lineage and 2010 Toppstown had a baby:

I don't know about you, but that resemblance to Toppstown is a little scary for me. Buying a whole pack of Toppstown would have been unthinkable five years ago, but there are definite similarities. Wrapping your set in gray will do that.

The old-timers in this set are fun.

And, yes, like every Topps set for the last however many years, the young players have to be squeezed in no matter how established they are.

This insert looks A LOT better as a scan than it does in person.

And perhaps an indication of how much I paid for each pack is the fact I received the same Unique Unis insert in each pack.

Again, this looks better on a screen than it does in person. But it's not bad and quite collectible, even if Peter O'Brien to me is the Rangers infielder of the 1980s.

Here are all the Topps Bunt Dodgers that AJ of The Lost Collector sent:

Good thing, because I only pulled the Koufax and Pederson.

Overall, this is a decent, adequate-looking set. Some have said it would be a good replacement for Opening Day, which is getting more repetitive by the year. That would work for me. But I think Topps' priority is how this set draws more interest to its online stuff, and not how it competes on the store shelves.

For me, it's nice to have real cards of those images I've seen on people's screens. In person, the cards don't look as great as the backlit images, which is to be expected.

In short, they're real but they're not spectacular.

Sorry, Bunt. You're no Teri Hatcher.


deal said…
maybe it is just a contrast with the other Dodger cards, but I can barely make out the LA logo on the Koufax card.
Nachos Grande said…
I have to admit that I LOVE the large logos - and the cards look nice in the scans (as you said). I haven't been interested in the Opening Day brand in, well, forever - so I can honestly say a set like this is more appealing to me than OD at least. (faint praise of course)
It was a fun break, overall. I looked at it as seperate than the digital product so as to not get held up on it. Price point is a nice option. The Opening Day point is a real one. That set is just so unappealing being a regurgitation of a set that comes out a month before. I appreciate this being its own unique set.
JWillden27 said…
Of you are looking to move any non Dodgers, let me know. I would love to get the catchers and Thor.
Topps continues to find ways to separate people from their money.
CaptKirk42 said…
I saw packages of Bunt when I was at Target on Saturday. Was NOT interested in them, have no desire for them whatsoever. I'm with you about the "physical" cards thing. I don't do the digital on any level. For me anything on my computer screen is just digital information that is a million times more likely to get lost, damaged or in some other way non-accessible than anything physical. For me these "physical" bunt cards are just printouts of the digital information and as a matter of principle I will have nothing to do with them. I'm also against the "books" (two or more cards joined together to make a "book") as a matter of principle. I kind of like the look of the base cards. I think Topps makes too many damn products anyway and then makes 100,000s of parallels of them.
Rob said…
I had the Topps BUNT app for awhile...but it felt like the 90's all over again with inserts after inserts after INSERTS. I have a friend who is not a collector or interested in baseball but has a digital BUNT account to sell cards on eBay. Digital cards on eBay. He's making money on cards that don't actually exist. I deleted my account right after he told me that. It hurt my brain too much and i don't miss it.
GCA said…
As another "physical only" collector, I AM actually interested in these, regardless of their plainness. A cheap product with no shortprints, a moderate amount of inserts, and an easily completed base set that contains retired veterans along with the required rookies? YES PLEASE.

Watch out Topps, this could become the most popular issue besides flagship and A&G, and it will be because of the above points while not increasing your digital customers at all. Then you will see that simple and easy is BETTER than overstuffed with rookies, no retired veterans and shortprints and parallels out the wazoo. And god forbid you boost the appeal of the design on top of all could even appeal to the young people!!
Nick said…
I bought a 36-pack box of these online (w/free shipping) for only a couple dollars more than I would've paid for a blaster of A&G, Chrome, etc. The Bunt design isn't really a standout, and it does seem like the set is basically a shill for the online product, but I still like it, if for no other reason than I got to bust 36 packs of a halfway decent set for such an budget-friendly price. And the inserts are cool, especially the Unique Unis.
gcrl said…
a topps card featuring nomar as an athletic is really nice to see.
Josh D. said…
My kids are going to love this. The price is right! You can spend 3 bucks for a 6-card pack of Ginter (or a 4-card pack of Chrome), or get 24 cards with Bunt. I gotta go to Target to get some of these.
Big Tone said…
I have the app but don't pay for any of the packs I open.Every day you get 10,000 points and 25,000 on the weekends.I usually let the points build up and when I'm bored I crack open a few packs.I never saw it as collecting though.To me it was all about getting a sneak peak at the flagship product and seeing some neat insert designs .And all for free.I would never pay for a digital card unless I was able to have it delivered.I'm glad they finally went "physical",though.I always hoped they would.

Popular posts from this blog

Stuck in traffic with Series 2

In the whirlwind that has been my life this month, I found myself going absolutely nowhere for a portion of Thursday afternoon. I was in the middle of yet another road trip, the third one this week. This one was for work, and because it was job-related, it became quickly apparent that it would be a waste of time. The only thing that could save it was a side visit to the nearby Walmart to see if I could spot some Topps Series 2. I found it right away, which was shocking as I was pretty much in the middle of the country, where SUVs share the road with tractors and buggies. Who knew that the Amish wanted Series 2, too? The problem was getting back into civilization to open the contents of the 72-card hanger box I bought. The neighboring village is undergoing a summer construction project smack in the middle of downtown. It's not much of a downtown, but the main road happens to be the main artery in the entire county. Everyone -- and by everyone I mean every tractor trailer ha

Heading upstate

  Back in 1999, Sports Illustrated published an edition at the end of the year rating the top 50 athletes of the century for every state.   As a lifelong Upstate New Yorker, I braced for a list of New York State athletes that consisted almost entirely of downstate natives, that is, folks from the greater NYC area and Long Island.   We Upstaters are used to New York City trampling all over the rest of the state. They have the most people, the loudest voices. It happens all the time. It's a phenomenon unique to this state. Heck, there are still people out there who, when you tell them you're from New York, automatically think you're from NYC. They don't think of cows and chickens when they think of New York. But trust me, there are a lot of cows and chickens in New York State. Especially cows.   So, anyway, when I counted up the baseball players that SI listed as the greatest from New York State, six of the nine were from New York City or Long Island. I was surprised all

G.O.A.T, the '80s: 30-21

  I often call this current period of the television sports calendar the black hole of sports programming. The time between the end of the Super Bowl and the beginning of televised Spring Training baseball games is an empty void when I'm looking for something to watch on traditional television. I don't watch the NBA and I find the NHL on TV holds my interest for maybe a period. College basketball I can't watch until the tournament. This didn't used to be as much of a problem back when I could turn instead to my favorite sitcoms in February. Do you remember when February was "sweeps month"? (Maybe it still is, I don't know). Networks would make sure that every top show aired original episodes that month, no reruns. So you'd always have something to view during the week even when the sports scene was boring. (I know, people have multiple streaming viewing options now. But I find myself going weeks sometimes before I see something I want to view on Netfli