Skip to main content

Resistance is futile


One thing that I have learned from operating a popular blog is that people actually do read the words that I write. However, when they extract the meaning from those words, it is sometimes what they want it to mean, not what I want it to mean.

For example, I fully expect to receive Donruss puzzle pieces in the mail after yesterday's post. Even though I wrote in that post that I have no desire to complete any of the incomplete puzzles that I showed, people will interpret that post as me saying that I desperately want to complete them.

All right. Whatever. Bring on the puzzle pieces. If that's the price to pay for people coming to your blog every day, I'm up for it. Resistance is futile.

And, here, I have another example for you.

A couple of weeks ago, I showed off a very large box of goodies sent to me by Rob, a.k.a., steelehere. I took some of the contents of that box and turned it into a contest.

Well, that wasn't the only box Rob sent.

There was a second one, and before it arrived, Rob sent me an email. In it he said the following:

"You'll see something that you're not a big fan of but it definitely fills a need of yours."

Great. Somebody else deciding what I need.

But I've got a somewhat open mind, so no big deal, and not too long after that email the second box showed up. It is quite possibly the heaviest card package I've ever received. And the contents are good for at least three posts, probably more (don't worry, I'll space them out).

One of the items that weighed down that box is the same item that Rob "warned" me about.


What you see there is a complete set of 1987 Topps.

If you've read this blog for awhile you know that I have said on several occasions that not only had I not completed the 1987 Topps set but that I really had no desire to complete it. Even though every other Topps set from the '80s sits complete in a binder in my card room, there was no aching hole in my collecting soul that would only be filled by 1987 Topps.

Obviously, Rob would have none of it.


So I now own what probably thousands of other collectors own -- every card from 1 to 792 of 1987 Topps.

For decades I owned maybe 150-200 cards from 1987 Topps. That's what resulted from the packs that I bought that year. Over the last 10 years or so, I accumulated about 200 more cards from the set, through repacks mostly. The cards -- although wildly popular with those who grew up during the junk wax era -- didn't thrill me any more than they did in 1987.


Obviously, these cards were everywhere. You could argue that 1987 Topps was the most overproduced of all sets (I still see more 1989 Topps). And I started to think, wouldn't it be interesting if I could come close to completing 1987 Topps passively? What if I just kept buying repacks and such and suddenly I had 715 cards from the set? Wouldn't that be cool?


Rob apparently thought this was silly. "Who collects like this?" he must have said.

It's pretty obvious how Rob collected the set. As you probably saw from the picture, the set is jammed into one box. Seventy-nine different penny sleeves contain 10 or so cards from the set. Rob said the set has been stored like this for decades and I can tell.

Inside some of the penny sleeves are certain cards protected by their own penny sleeve.


These are the cards that in 1987 terms were determined to be VALUABLE. They were investments, destined to rocket in price and pay for your waterfront home. So, yes, players like Tony Gwynn and Roger Clemens are contained in their own penny sleeves, but also players like Billy Jo Robidoux here. The fact that Bruce Ruffin and Tracy Jones and Robby Thompson receive their own penny sleeves is ... well, I'm trying not to snicker, but sooooooo late 1980s.

Collectors in 1987 were adorable.

It's entirely possible that Rob at one point tried to sell this box for one million dollars.



But enough of me poking wise. There is something else I want to get to with this set.

During my collecting days, I've seen more than my share of junk wax. Certain cards I have seen so many times that they lose their meaning. How many times do I need to see the 1989 Topps Roberto Alomar Jr. card? The same amount of times I need to hear "Eye Of The Tiger" again, that's how many times.

There are plenty of those same cards in 1987 Topps. Dave Bergman, Paul Molitor, Alejandro Pena, I've seen them more times than the inside of my own car.

But if you're a set collector, you know what I'm getting at next.


There are cards -- yes, even in 1987 Topps -- that I have never seen before. In fact, every '87 card that I have shown so far in this post is a card I have never seen before.

How is that possible? It's possible because unless you attempt to collect a set, you'll never see all of the cards that need to be seen from that year. You will be deprived of certain golden gems. And this is one of the greatest parts of set collecting. The joy of discovery. And by the time you've completed the set, you will have discovered them all.


Ray Soff. Until the moment I prepared for this post by looking through as many cards in this box as I could, I had never heard of Ray Soff. 1987 Topps has been around for 28 years, and I'm now just discovering someone named Ray Soff.

That doesn't seem right. I should have known there was a Ray Soff a long time ago.

Rob probably thought so, too. And that's why I now have a complete set of 1987 Topps.

And that means I have now completed Topps sets from 1974 through 1989. And I know all the players from all of those sets.

So, yeah, I guess this did fill a need of mine. Although now I have to get a binder and all of that.

Plus, now I have like 400 dupes of 1987 Topps -- like every other collector on the planet.

Heh. Anybody need any?

Comments

Zippy Zappy said…
If you're moving any Yankees/Pirates dupes, I'll take them. Got some foreign contacts who think of "vintage" as pre-1995 so... :).
Big Tone said…
What's cool about recouping some of those old sets/cards Is If you can get them In good condition.I've had a ton of 87 Topps Keith Hernandez cards,but they pale In comparison to a crispy,clean copy with 4 sharp corners.I've always liked the Boggs from this set.1987 Topps also marks the return of the Golden Cup!
Nachos Grande said…
I'm using 1987 Topps cards as packing material for my recent group break. I think after this break I'll finally be out of the stuff (and no, I do not want your duplicates - I already have my own set complete, thank you very much)!
Mike Matson said…
I'm still trying to complete this set
Hackenbush said…
Gee, if I'd known you had wanted a set... I have three sealed factory versions about six feet from where I'm sitting. I did buy them new thinking they'd be worth something in 2015 (or a lot earlier). I'm not very bright.
AdamE said…
Dies this mean your going to take a more serious stab at 73?
I need to get on Rob's Christmas list :-)

I'm always tempted by the prospect of players from the 75 Topps set in other years but I don't think the cardboard's worth the shipping cost...
BobWalkthePlank said…
The Spike Owen card would have been perfect for F*** Face on the bat
Stack22 said…
I'm certainly of the age demographic that considers '87 an iconic classic. Due in no small part to the fact the largest portion of my father's collection to survive the thieving hands of my much older cousins was '62 Topps. It served as a tangible connection, at least in my mind, between myself and my father.
GCA said…
I got my '87 set two years ago from a starter set from my friend, which we then completed the next day at the LCS down the street, pulling every other card from the bulk boxes of junk wax, including the Bonds. Started and finished it in two days. In 2013.

Now if I could only find a cheap box of 1985....
Paul Hadsall said…
I'm with you on the 1987 Topps set. I have way too many cards from it to ever really appreciate it, and the design has not aged well. But at least it looks nicer than 1986 or 1988 did.
Rob said…
I only know who Ray Soff is because he was born in my hometown!
night owl said…
No new set collecting project gets serious until I finish 1972.
I'm actually a big fan of the '87 set. It was the first time I had gotten back into collecting after a few years break. I bought a lot...a real lot of it.
Fuji said…
1987 Topps recently moved into my top 10 list of favorite Topps baseball card sets. It's got a solid design... and I like a lot of the photographs. It also played a significant role for me in terms of card collecting. Congratulations on adding it to your collection.

Popular posts from this blog

G.O.A.T, the '80s: 30-21

  I often call this current period of the television sports calendar the black hole of sports programming. The time between the end of the Super Bowl and the beginning of televised Spring Training baseball games is an empty void when I'm looking for something to watch on traditional television. I don't watch the NBA and the NHL on TV holds my interest for maybe a period. College basketball I can't watch until the tournament. This didn't used to be as much of a problem back when I could turn instead to my favorite sitcoms in February. Do you remember when February was "sweeps month"? (Maybe it still is, I don't know). Networks would make sure that every top show aired original episodes that month, no reruns. So you'd always have something to view during the week even when the sports scene was boring. (I know, people have multiple streaming viewing options now. But I find myself going weeks sometimes before I see something I want to view on Netflix or Am

The return of COMC and a ridiculous collecting quest

  For the first time in exactly a year, I received a shipment of cards from COMC last week. I wouldn't say COMC is truly back back. I did pay extra for the express shipping so I wouldn't have to wait however long we're waiting for COMC shipments these days. But the cards arrived in short fashion and it was nice to see something in the mailbox from my preferred online card site for over a decade until last year. I had waited a year to order what was in my cart. I didn't want to be one of those people who paid and then waited nine months for shipment. I mean, what if I ordered them and COMC went under? Those were the kind of questions that were floating in my head last year.   That meant that I did lose a couple of items out of my cart, but no big deal. Nothing in there was anything highly sought-after and I merely replaced whatever I lost with a new version or something else I liked. Many of my collecting interests are not high on anyone's radar, especially 2020 fli

Say hey, you guys

  One of the most significant cards in my collecting history arrived at my door today. The 1956 Topps Willie Mays card ties my formative collecting days to my current collecting existence, confirms what I believe in in this hobby, and realizes dreams from long ago I never thought possible. It also sets a couple of personal records. It is the most I've ever spent on a single card. Yet it didn't hurt my wallet nor cause any regret. In terms of a cardboard acquisition it is about as perfect as it gets. No guilt. All power and beauty. It removes a considerable road block in my quest to complete the 1956 Topps set. It was one of the Big Three that I fretted over for years. "How would I ever obtain that card?" And now it's here. I don't have to remind you that baseball legends from the 1950s (and '60s and '70s) are departing at a rapid pace. That wasn't a top consideration in landing this card. But with Willie's age (he will be 90 in May) and the way