Skip to main content

Awesome night card, pt. 148


You can expect to see this card again in December. Look at all those Jingle Bells colors. It's Christmas in July! Makes me think it's going to snow even though it's 91 right now and hasn't rained for weeks.

I present this card to you while not exactly in a "Look! Manny Ramirez never played for the A's!" frame of mind. It's kind of fun, much like the old '70s days in which Bill Grief appeared as an Expo even though he never played for them, or Bud Harrelson as an Astro, or innumerable Blue Jays and Mariners in the 1977 set. But it's kind of frustrating in that it's a bit of fiction in your team binder while middle relievers remain total non-entities to Topps.

But Topps has toyed with Manny's cards for so long now -- removing umps entirely, leaving umps' disconnected legs -- that I'm getting bored with it.

I can't even get fired up trying to determine when this photo actually took place.

My theory is Ramirez is actually in a Los Angeles Dodgers uniform. I'm guessing this because Ramirez is featuring the peak extended dreadlocks look of his Dodger days, and he's also got that gunked-up helmet that he wore so vigorously with the Dodgers.

The game in the photo is taking place at Whatever We're Calling The Giants' Ballpark Today, which makes me suspect he's playing for the Dodgers even more.


Here you see Ramirez on his 2010 Topps card, watching an extra-base hit fly in San Francisco.

So not only do I think it's in San Francisco, but I think it's a photo from 2009.

Here's the photoshopped card again:


Ramirez is wearing an elbow guard on his left arm, which he wore with the Dodgers in 2009. He didn't wear it in 2008, or at least not in his card photos. In 2008, he had that blue left arm sleeve thing.


There's a look at Ramirez's elbow guard, long dreadlocks and gunked-up helmet on a 2010 Topps Attax card (along with a long-forgotten code).

Ramirez wore his hair long and wore that elbow guard when he played with the White Sox in 2010. But the White Sox didn't play the Giants during the 2010 season.


The bat Ramirez is using confused me. It's black and features the No. 22 on the end. No. 22 for the Dodgers is Clayton Kershaw. I have no idea if Kershaw owned a black bat in 2009. I have no idea if pitchers even have their own bats.

So I'm stumped there.

But I'm not going any farther with it because I've already taken way too much time on it for someone who allegedly doesn't care about finding the answer.

If you have any tips, let me know. I guess.

At any rate, this post has paid off for one reason.


I discovered when researching Manny Dodger cards that I hadn't included this 2010 card in with the rest of my 2010 Dodger set in the binder.

(*Gasp*) To the dupes box!!!

Fortunately, I fished out one of my many 2010 Ramirez dupes and now it's waiting to join Juan Pierre, Carlos Monasterios and all those other no longer relevant Dodgers.

Of course, this has caused my brain to ponder what other base cards I've skipped over in my suddenly Incomplete complete sets. It's making me weary, which is really the general theme of this post and the last few days.

I think I need a vacation from cards.

--------------------------------------------------------------------

Night Card Binder candidate: Manny Ramirez, 2012 Topps, #393
Does it make the binder: Yes. In all its fictitious glory.

Comments

Nick said…
Because I featured that A's Manny card in my "zero-year" theme, another blogger sent me a link to the original photo that was used for his 2012 card.

It's from his tenure with the Dodgers, taken during a June 28, 2010 game against the Giants.

http://www.gettyimages.com/detail/news-photo/manny-ramirez-of-the-los-angeles-dodgers-in-action-against-news-photo/102533677
gcrl said…
For over 18 years I overlooked the fact that a 1990 mike Davis card was missing from my Topps dodger team set binder. so don't feel too badly about a 2010 manny.

Popular posts from this blog

Stuck in traffic with Series 2

In the whirlwind that has been my life this month, I found myself going absolutely nowhere for a portion of Thursday afternoon. I was in the middle of yet another road trip, the third one this week. This one was for work, and because it was job-related, it became quickly apparent that it would be a waste of time. The only thing that could save it was a side visit to the nearby Walmart to see if I could spot some Topps Series 2. I found it right away, which was shocking as I was pretty much in the middle of the country, where SUVs share the road with tractors and buggies. Who knew that the Amish wanted Series 2, too? The problem was getting back into civilization to open the contents of the 72-card hanger box I bought. The neighboring village is undergoing a summer construction project smack in the middle of downtown. It's not much of a downtown, but the main road happens to be the main artery in the entire county. Everyone -- and by everyone I mean every tractor trailer ha

Heading upstate

  Back in 1999, Sports Illustrated published an edition at the end of the year rating the top 50 athletes of the century for every state.   As a lifelong Upstate New Yorker, I braced for a list of New York State athletes that consisted almost entirely of downstate natives, that is, folks from the greater NYC area and Long Island.   We Upstaters are used to New York City trampling all over the rest of the state. They have the most people, the loudest voices. It happens all the time. It's a phenomenon unique to this state. Heck, there are still people out there who, when you tell them you're from New York, automatically think you're from NYC. They don't think of cows and chickens when they think of New York. But trust me, there are a lot of cows and chickens in New York State. Especially cows.   So, anyway, when I counted up the baseball players that SI listed as the greatest from New York State, six of the nine were from New York City or Long Island. I was surprised all

G.O.A.T, the '80s: 30-21

  I often call this current period of the television sports calendar the black hole of sports programming. The time between the end of the Super Bowl and the beginning of televised Spring Training baseball games is an empty void when I'm looking for something to watch on traditional television. I don't watch the NBA and I find the NHL on TV holds my interest for maybe a period. College basketball I can't watch until the tournament. This didn't used to be as much of a problem back when I could turn instead to my favorite sitcoms in February. Do you remember when February was "sweeps month"? (Maybe it still is, I don't know). Networks would make sure that every top show aired original episodes that month, no reruns. So you'd always have something to view during the week even when the sports scene was boring. (I know, people have multiple streaming viewing options now. But I find myself going weeks sometimes before I see something I want to view on Netfli