Skip to main content

Define the design: 73T, 76T, 08T

First off, I would like to say, a hearty, long-overdue, much-deserved congratulations to ...

Heh, heh. Don't worry. I'm not congratulating them. They'll be patting themselves on the back long into next year. They don't need me. So, instead, I've decided to ignore them. And it may last all the way through 2010.

(However, if I happen to hear one more Yankee say, "it's been a long time," I am going to set out to play every lottery and visit every casino in the country for the REST OF MY LIFE until I win enough to buy a baseball team. Then I'm going to pool my vast cash-laden resources with a few richy-rich Cubs fans who really know what "a long time" means, rename my club the Antiyankees, and make the team's mission statement as follows: "We will do everything possible to make sure the Yankees don't win again until every other team has won 27 World Series titles.")

No, my congratulations are going to the 2008 Topps set, whose design will now be known as the "circus circles" design. The name reflects the colorful backdrop behind the team name, which resembles old-style circus advertisements.

I think that's a pretty obvious name for the design, but if someone has something better, I'm listening.

I'd also like to hear folks' ideas for a design name for this set:

The 1973 Topps set. It's a simple design, especially when you compare it with the set from the previous year. The '73 set is probably most identifiable by its position logo.

But that brings up the question: If we name the '73 design after its position logo, then what do we name the '76 Topps design?

It's also a design that featured a tiny drawing for each of the positions. Perhaps a name focusing on the two-tone bars at the bottom works better for this set.

But that's what I'm looking for: a name for both the '73 and '76 Topps sets. I haven't come up with anything myself, so I really need some ideas.

No prizes this time, since there's already a contest going on at NOC right now. But I'm thinking of adding the names of the people who came up with the designs to my "Define the Design" sidebar. That means you have the chance to be forever immortalized on "Night Owl Cards." You know, like those paper shamrocks with people's names on them that they plaster all over the wall at Kmart around St. Patrick's Day?

Yeah, I know. Whoopee.

Comments

dayf said…
I called '08 Topps "Circus retro" when I first saw the design. http://cardjunk.blogspot.com/2007/11/2008-topps-sell-sheet-review.html That damn set has almost completely soured me on Topps' base set so now I'd call it mud.

I could be cynical and call '73 Topps "Horrible grainy action photo set" but that's not nice.

The first thing I think of with '73 is that circle behind the position logo. the first thing I think about '76 Topps are those stripes at the bottom. "Circle" and "stripes" are a little bland so howzabout "Silhouette position set" and The Colorful name stripes set".

Eeech, those sound bad too. Someone improve on that. Have you done '83 Topps yet? That needs to be the kickass awesome set.
Anonymous said…
'73 is the Avatar Set; '76 is the ASL Set*


*American Sign Language; the image in the corner reminds be of deaf signers on a TV program
Nachos Grande said…
I always thought of the '08 set as the "Dippin' Dots" set.
SpastikMooss said…
As a former employee of Dippin Dots, I agree Nacho
mmosley said…
The bottom corner of 1973 Topps reminds me of the opening credits of a James Bond movie, so I am going with "Baseball Diamonds are Forever"
I was going to say "Silhouette set", but dayf beat me to it....I do second his nomination though.
GCA said…
I call 2008 the Circus Balloons set.
After really looking at the 1973 design, I'd go for something like "Big Name Spotlight set" for the large last names and the position icon.
1976's color bands have become one of my favorite vintage designs. But the color bands set is kinda lame. Maybe the "Firm Foundation" set because of the solid base to each picture.

Popular posts from this blog

That was easy

   My approach on 2021 Topps, after seeing the cards, empty shelves and the tales of inflated prices, was that I could last the entire year without buying any.   The effort wasn't worth it. I'll just take my Dodgers and go home.   I went to Target once after the release date a couple weeks ago, I don't really remember what day I went, and saw empty shelves and shrugged.   So, move forward two weeks and it's birthday season. Those who have read this blog for awhile know I have a lot of birthdays in my family in March and it's the primary shopping time of the year, besides Christmas. I went to Target yesterday for a few items and I made sure to check the card aisle, just in case. I didn't expect to find anything, but I think you know me by now, I have to buy my first packs of the season if I have the opportunity. It's worth a look. The shelves seemed fairly empty as I approached. But they weren't. When I got there, I saw maybe six or seven 2021 Topps baseb

Reliving my childhood isn't easy

  My favorite part of collecting cards doesn't have to do with collecting current players, rookie cards or prospecting.   Although I pay attention to and buy modern cards and also seek out cards from before I was collecting or even before I was born, none of those cards are why I'm doing this.   The best part of collecting for me -- where the warm fuzzies reside, what I'd save for myself after chucking the rest of my collection -- is any card that was released when I was a child or young teen. I don't think I'm special in that way. A lot of collectors probably feel that way. But, unlike, say, the adult who grew up during the junk wax era, who can open pack after pack of 1990 Donruss and get that nostalgic rush without fear of packs ever disappearing, it's a little more difficult for me. I can go to a discount store a couple of miles away in town and grab some 1988 Donruss packs (I think I can still do that, who knows with the hobby weirdness lately). But there&#

G.O.A.T, the '80s: 20-11

  Big news at the night owl nest today. I subscribed to MLB.TV. Finally, I can watch any game I want this season. I no longer have to suffer with seeing the Mets play the Marlins for the 197th time or grit my teeth through Michael Kay because there's no baseball to watch anywhere else. I can ignore the Yankees for 162 games if I want! And that's what I plan to do. The Phillies-Orioles spring training game is on right now and then I'll search out something even more obscure later. I know, I know, I'm late to the party. That's the way it's been when it comes to entertainment viewing for most of my life. Taking years to land an MLB subscription was more of a cash-flow issue, but when I was younger, I'd miss out on the popular movies all the time because of a relatively sheltered existence. While high school classmates were quoting lines from Caddyshack and Stripes in the lunch room and on the school bus, I knew mostly Star Wars movies and E.T. HBO was the big t