Skip to main content

Bubbling over

Baseball and bubblegum.

To me, they seem to be one and the same. They go together. That old commercial jingle got it wrong. Apple pie? Who eats apple pie at a ballpark? "Baseball, hot dogs, bubblegum and Chevrolet" is how it should read.

For at least as long as Topps and Bowman have been around, there's been gum at the ballpark. Card companies that also pedaled in gum made sure it was available to players. A player blowing a bubble was considered free advertising.

But try to catch a bubblegum bubble on the front of a baseball card prior to the 1970s. I'm almost certain it doesn't exist. A wad of tobacco chaw in a cheek is much easier to spot on cards between 1951-71. I know, I've looked. There are more tobacco chewers in the first 30 cards of the 1960 Topps set than there are gum chewers in the entire 572 cards that year (2-0 is that score).

That is completely ridiculous. Don't we call these little pieces of cardboard "bubblegum cards?" Yet, there was no bubblegum in those pictures?

The major reason for that, I believe, is that tobacco simply was the chew of choice for years and years in baseball. Baseball cards weren't packaged with gum way back when the 20th century was shiny and new. They were packaged with tobacco. Old habits die hard in baseball, even nasty, disgusting, unhealthy ones. You were almost required to chew tobacco to fit in with your teammates.

Also, gum-chewing, and especially bubble blowing, was perceived by the baseball crowd as lackadaisical, unfocused, less than serious. Bubble blowing makes a player appear carefree, relaxed. But nobody wanted players to look carefree and relaxed back in the 1950s. Or at least the managers didn't. The late Bob Lemke dug up an article about the bubble blow up that occurred when Mickey Mantle was spotted emitting a pink bubble from his mouth. The media thought it was delightful and Mantle's picture appeared in all the papers. But manager Casey Stengel was enraged. Scandalous! The Mick wasn't taking the game seriously!

Today, it's difficult to understand why that was such a big deal. Gum is much more prevalent than tobacco on MLB fields these days and players can be spotted blowing bubbles daily, before cameras and everything.

Bubblegum bubbles appear frequently on baseball cards now. Sometimes they are short-printed (a terrible idea, by the way), and sometimes they are included in the regular set.

The art of bubble blowing was even made into an insert set in last year's Topps Opening Day set.

Gum bubbles have appeared in sets regularly for the last 30 years, boosted by prominent 1990s card companies like Upper Deck and Pinnacle, and prominent baseball cards like ... well, like this:

So when did the change begin? That's what interests me. Sure, I know there was no gum on cards for ages and a lot of gum on cards in the last 25 years. But when did it start?

On the field, people credit "Big League Chew," the gum product developed in part by former pitcher Jim Bouton in the late 1970s that resembles a tobacco pouch but actually produces shredded gum. Players were weaned off tobacco and onto gum during the '70s.

On cards, most would credit the famed 1976 Topps Bazooka Bubblegum Blowing contest card:

A classic, no doubt. One of the best cards there is, for my bubblegum money.

But this is not the first appearance of a bubblegum bubble on a baseball card.

In the 1975 Topps set, Bert Blyleven is shown blowing a bubble in the dugout. It's one of my favorite cards from that entire set.

But, still, that isn't the first appearance of a bubblegum bubble on a baseball card.

What is?

Well, I will show the following card while saying I have not looked at all of the cards issued prior to the arrival of this card. There could very well be another earlier card with a player producing a bubblegum bubble. But until I get paid for unearthing stuff like this -- or until someone else does their own damn research -- this is the first official moment in which a player is shown producing a bubblegum bubble on his card:

It's Ken Reitz, on his 1974 Topps card (his first solo card, by the way).

If indeed this is the first moment of a gum bubble being born on a baseball card, I think we owe Ken Reitz a plaque or a trophy or our debt of gratitude or something -- maybe a bucket of Bazooka.

Without Mr. Reitz would we have this?

Would we have Pinnacle Griffey in '95 or Topps Bevacqua in '76? Would we have Brad Mills in 1982 Fleer or Sean Casey in 2005 Topps?

There are many collectors who compile "bubblegum blowers" mini-collections. Seeing a player blowing a gum bubble is fun. It is evidence of what we most like about the game -- it's fun.

Chewing and spitting and brown stains on your uniform pants? That's not fun.

I'm so glad we came around on that.

Let's all think of Ken Reitz the next time you see a ballplayer blow a bubblegum bubble.


shoeboxlegends said…
I can't believe I never knew that Bouton was involved with Big League Chew! Great post as always Night Owl!
BobWalkthePlank said…
It would figure that Kershaw's bubble looks perfect. That guy can't do wrong. Ken Reitz needs to practice.
Fuji said…
Great stuff. If I were more motivated... I'd wanna dig through my box of vintage in search of the 74T Ken Reitz bubble gum rookie card.
CaptKirk42 said…
Scrumpdillyicious fun stuff. Cherry Pie? I thought it was Apple Pie? Whatevers.
night owl said…
It is apple pie. I must've been thinking of Warrant.
Matt said…
I'm tempted to start a petition to have bubblegum blowing contests part of the All-Star Game festivities. Bevacqua has held the record for too long. (At least, I'm guessing he still holds the record...)
BaseSetCalling said…
put me down as a bubble gum fan. Adam Jones is good for such cards.

the best are "In Action" bubble gum blowing cards, where the ball is in play but someone is still blowing a bubble

I need that Kershaw

Popular posts from this blog

Stuck in traffic with Series 2

In the whirlwind that has been my life this month, I found myself going absolutely nowhere for a portion of Thursday afternoon. I was in the middle of yet another road trip, the third one this week. This one was for work, and because it was job-related, it became quickly apparent that it would be a waste of time. The only thing that could save it was a side visit to the nearby Walmart to see if I could spot some Topps Series 2. I found it right away, which was shocking as I was pretty much in the middle of the country, where SUVs share the road with tractors and buggies. Who knew that the Amish wanted Series 2, too? The problem was getting back into civilization to open the contents of the 72-card hanger box I bought. The neighboring village is undergoing a summer construction project smack in the middle of downtown. It's not much of a downtown, but the main road happens to be the main artery in the entire county. Everyone -- and by everyone I mean every tractor trailer ha

Heading upstate

  Back in 1999, Sports Illustrated published an edition at the end of the year rating the top 50 athletes of the century for every state.   As a lifelong Upstate New Yorker, I braced for a list of New York State athletes that consisted almost entirely of downstate natives, that is, folks from the greater NYC area and Long Island.   We Upstaters are used to New York City trampling all over the rest of the state. They have the most people, the loudest voices. It happens all the time. It's a phenomenon unique to this state. Heck, there are still people out there who, when you tell them you're from New York, automatically think you're from NYC. They don't think of cows and chickens when they think of New York. But trust me, there are a lot of cows and chickens in New York State. Especially cows.   So, anyway, when I counted up the baseball players that SI listed as the greatest from New York State, six of the nine were from New York City or Long Island. I was surprised all

G.O.A.T, the '80s: 30-21

  I often call this current period of the television sports calendar the black hole of sports programming. The time between the end of the Super Bowl and the beginning of televised Spring Training baseball games is an empty void when I'm looking for something to watch on traditional television. I don't watch the NBA and I find the NHL on TV holds my interest for maybe a period. College basketball I can't watch until the tournament. This didn't used to be as much of a problem back when I could turn instead to my favorite sitcoms in February. Do you remember when February was "sweeps month"? (Maybe it still is, I don't know). Networks would make sure that every top show aired original episodes that month, no reruns. So you'd always have something to view during the week even when the sports scene was boring. (I know, people have multiple streaming viewing options now. But I find myself going weeks sometimes before I see something I want to view on Netfli