Last weekend I was at a card show. I picked up enough Dodgers from the 2014 Topps Heritage set that I almost have a complete team set.
Unfortunately, I fell a few cards short and there are still a couple that I need.
But those are just modern card problems. This weekend's achievement blows last weekend's achievement away.
2014 Heritage, after all, is merely mimicking 1965 Topps.
And just the other day, Dave K. sent me Johnny Podres here.
It was the last card I needed to finish off the team set from '65 Topps.
Look:
I suppose some would say the ERA Leaders card doesn't belong with the team set, but I and a number of others think it does. And since that's the case, I still need the strikeout leaders card from that set, in which Drysdale is in the bottom right corner of the card.
But basically I'm finished with the team set from '65.
This is terrific for so many reasons:
1. '65 is one of the best sets of the '60s
2. Heritage is paying tribute to the '65 set this year
3. '65 is the year Sandy Koufax ruled the earth
4. '65 is the year the Dodgers won the World Series
5. '65 is the year I was born
The card world is in harmony today.
I remember the first two Dodger cards from this set that I ever had. They were Frank Howard and Ron Perranoski. I still have those originals, obtained during the first time that I knew I could obtain vintage cards (I don't remember how I obtained them, but I know it was during my early high school years).
From the 1960s, this completes the 1965, 1967, 1968 and 1969 Dodgers Topps team sets for me. I have a lot more hard work to go.
But today I am celebrating.
(P.S.: If you know the title reference, you know why it applies, you're as old as I am, and your taste in music may be as questionable as mine).
Comments
All my non-Phillies are in binders per year, and within a binder are grouped by team (yes, I know most everyone else arranges then numerically). All the "non-team" cards I described above are in the front, with each type having their own page(s).
Doo-wop-diddy-wop-diddy-wop-doo...? Sounds kind of familiar, but...
(Looks at comments)
'65 Love Affair? I should know that, but I'm still not placing it...
(Goes to YouTube for the video)
Oh, yeah, that song. Meh.
(Stops the video and goes to take a shower)
Doo-wop-diddy-wop-diddy-wop-doo...
(Brushing teeth)
Doo-wop-diddy-wop-diddy-wop-doo...
(Getting dressed)
'65 love affair, we weren't gettin' nowhere but we didn't care...
Arrrrgh!!! Can't... Get... This... Song... Out... Of... My... Head!!!!!
(shakes fist towards the heaven and screams)
DAMN YOU, NIGHT OWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWL!!!!!!!
Awesome cards, by the way.
Doo-wop-diddy-wop-diddy-wop-doo
Doo-wop-diddy-wop-diddy-wop-doo...
random things.....Topps chose a good color scheme for the Dodgers in '65. The yellow/gold/tan goes nicely with the blue.... the Koufax is a neat card, I need to upgrade mine some day, it's kinda rough..... the red background on the team card looks wrong in that grouping. I'd of used blue.... it would have been cool if Sweet Lou Johnson had gotten a card, he was a key player in '65, but I understand why he wasn't in the set coming off a couple of years in the minors.
Above, I mentioned that I keep my Phillies in their own binder, and in that binder also include late-series rookie start cards that have Phillies and other teams' players on them (like the '68 Larry Hisle or '69 Terry Harmon). So, for those rare instances, I'm going against my own above-stated position on "non-team-specific" cards. But I don't do that with the leaders cards, I guess since they come in a set of 12, so I keep them all together, whereas the multi-team rookie cards are few and far between from 1964-1972.
Then, over in my 1967 binder, in (for example) the Astros section, I either have a duplicate Turk Farrell card, or a 2"x3" piece of paper with the player's name and a note that his card is in the Phillies binder.
Anal? I prefer "organized".