Skip to main content


A few months ago I wrote a post about the best collection of Topps sets when you grouped them by year. For instance, all the sets from a year that ends in "7."

My favorites out of that particular grouping are probably the "3s" and "5s". But no matter what my favorites are, it's a fact that there is only one group number for which I have not completed one set.

That group is the "2s".

If I explore why that is, this is what I come up with:

1. 1952 - iconic set that's way too expensive to complete, not that I've tried.
2. 1962 - older set that's also way too expensive to complete, not that I've tried
3. 1972 - currently attempting to complete, it's a toughie.
4. 1982 - currently attempting to complete after ignoring it for too long.
5. 1992 - it's OK, but early '90s cards take me to a bad place.
6. 2002 - pretty ugly set, not much interest.
7. 2012 - disgusted that I have the cards from this set that I have

OK, then. The "2s" are not very popular with night owl.

But I'm doing something about it. The two sets that I am chasing most vigorously right now each happen to end in "2s" -- 1972 and 1982. And I'm getting some help.

Recently, Mark H. discovered that there are people who blog about baseball cards. And to celebrate this discovery, he's been sending bloggers cards! This is very proper behavior, by the way.

Not too long ago he sent me cards from both 1972 and 1982 to help me with my sets. He also sent one other card and one other non-card item that I'm saving for later. Trust me, they will be well-timed.

But let's see the twos, shall we?

Starting with 1982, of course.

Mark sent a whole bunch so I had to display them nine at a time. They were all minty fresh, too and I got a faint whiff of gum from them, which is great. Not as great as Doug DeCinces signing an autograph, but still great.

The Bruce Sutter card is literally the star of this panel. The Verhoeven card I know I had once before. I don't know why I got rid of it. I'm guessing someone collected phone cards.

The Buddy Bell card is finally mine. The mournful Terry Harper card is finally mine. I'm so happy!

I distinctly remember collecting '82 Topps back in '82 and noting how few Yankees came out of packs. Particularly the all-star cards, of which the Yankees had four. By this point, my Yankee friends had stopped pestering me for cards, so I figured it was a Topps plot to filter Yankees cards away from Yankee haters.

I think that's the last "in action" card I need. Or maybe not. But I'm absolutely certain that it's a great card.

1982 Topps still evokes memories of the excitement I had as a youngster collecting cards, even if I was well into my high school years.

Now moving on to some cards that I didn't collect at all when they came out -- because I didn't know what baseball was at the time.

This is the best set of the "2s" and what better card to illustrate that than Maury Wills' last card?

A former Dodger. And a former Cardinal, Met, Twin, Indian, White Sox, Cub, Padre, Pirate and Tiger.

Not everyone can be a one-team man.

Finally, two of the best catchers of the 1970s in action.

That's another reason why I should treat the "2s" sets with a little more respect. They were the only sets to dedicate an entire subset to "IN ACTION."

But that's probably not enough for me to ever try to complete 2012 Topps.


Nick said…
I'm also glad Mark discovered the blogosphere as well, looks like he hooked you up! He's sent me some great cardboard that I'll soon be posting as well.
Commishbob said…
You posted a card of El Presidente? Color me surprised. I thought you were still holding that grudge.
hiflew said…
There's not much action in that Thurman Munson "In Action" card unless you think of a mound visit as "action-packed." It is also really weird to see Pascual Perez without his trademark Jheri-curl.

As far as the 2's go, I have completed 1992 Topps, but it's not really anything special. There is probably only one really memorable card in that whole set and that is the Cal Ripken pictured next to the Lou Gehrig plaque.

I think the the 2's are sort of in the middle, I love the 3's and 4's and can't stand the 0's.
Jeff said…
Always thought 82 was kinda lame, especially since I liked 81, 83, and 84 so much. I'm the oddball that likes the 4's. found some of the 82s on your list, I'll drop a PWE in the mail.
I remember when I discovered the card blogging community back in 2008. I've been like a kid in a candy store ever since.
night owl said…
I can handle Oriole El Presidente a lot better than Expo El Presidente.
Mark Hoyle said…
I'm glad the cards found a happy home. Have many more 70's and 80's dupes up for grabs. Reading all the blogs and making trades and passing along cards has been a lot of fun..
Fuji said…
My brain hurts going through and looking at all of those designs. After several minutes, I still can't pick a favorite. I'm thinking about turning it into a math problem and letting the numbers decide.

I will say this... the 2's are okay in my book.

1952 - Not a huge fan of this design, but it's definitely iconic.
1962 - Woodies are cool. This isn't my favorite set of the decade, but it's in the top 5.
1972 - Love this set. It's my birth year set, plus it's hard for me not to like those bright colors. Depending on my mood... this set competes with the 75T set for decade's finest.
1982 - Like the 62T set... it's not my favorite, but it's in the top 5.

From this point forward... the 2's fade fast.

1992 - The first "2" design that doesn't crack the top 5 for me.
2002 - Nasty. I think a lot of it has to do with the color of the border. Not a fan.
2012 - Lazy. So far it's the decade's worst (IMHO).

Popular posts from this blog

Stuck in traffic with Series 2

In the whirlwind that has been my life this month, I found myself going absolutely nowhere for a portion of Thursday afternoon. I was in the middle of yet another road trip, the third one this week. This one was for work, and because it was job-related, it became quickly apparent that it would be a waste of time. The only thing that could save it was a side visit to the nearby Walmart to see if I could spot some Topps Series 2. I found it right away, which was shocking as I was pretty much in the middle of the country, where SUVs share the road with tractors and buggies. Who knew that the Amish wanted Series 2, too? The problem was getting back into civilization to open the contents of the 72-card hanger box I bought. The neighboring village is undergoing a summer construction project smack in the middle of downtown. It's not much of a downtown, but the main road happens to be the main artery in the entire county. Everyone -- and by everyone I mean every tractor trailer ha

Heading upstate

  Back in 1999, Sports Illustrated published an edition at the end of the year rating the top 50 athletes of the century for every state.   As a lifelong Upstate New Yorker, I braced for a list of New York State athletes that consisted almost entirely of downstate natives, that is, folks from the greater NYC area and Long Island.   We Upstaters are used to New York City trampling all over the rest of the state. They have the most people, the loudest voices. It happens all the time. It's a phenomenon unique to this state. Heck, there are still people out there who, when you tell them you're from New York, automatically think you're from NYC. They don't think of cows and chickens when they think of New York. But trust me, there are a lot of cows and chickens in New York State. Especially cows.   So, anyway, when I counted up the baseball players that SI listed as the greatest from New York State, six of the nine were from New York City or Long Island. I was surprised all

G.O.A.T, the '80s: 30-21

  I often call this current period of the television sports calendar the black hole of sports programming. The time between the end of the Super Bowl and the beginning of televised Spring Training baseball games is an empty void when I'm looking for something to watch on traditional television. I don't watch the NBA and the NHL on TV holds my interest for maybe a period. College basketball I can't watch until the tournament. This didn't used to be as much of a problem back when I could turn instead to my favorite sitcoms in February. Do you remember when February was "sweeps month"? (Maybe it still is, I don't know). Networks would make sure that every top show aired original episodes that month, no reruns. So you'd always have something to view during the week even when the sports scene was boring. (I know, people have multiple streaming viewing options now. But I find myself going weeks sometimes before I see something I want to view on Netflix or Am