Skip to main content

The card after: ramblin, gamblin man

It's a new year and -- LQQK! -- I'm following through on a new series! Let's pause while I pat myself on the back.


This is the second edition of "The Card After," which is my attempt to shed light on a player's card that came after one that made him a card icon. For example, the first card I featured was the 1989 Fleer Billy Ripken "fuck face" card (I don't understand why people call it "rick face"). And then I showed the 1990 Fleer Billy Ripken card -- "the card after" -- because even 1990 Fleer deserves love sometimes.

That's basically the whole exercise. A little love for the overlooked. And to make you forget nuclear war (you'll have to read the Ripken post if you're confused).

Tonight we have an iconic card that you all know and love. Let's begin.


Please meet: 1976 Topps Traded Oscar Gamble

Why it's iconic: It's one of the most comical cards of all-time. The '76 Traded set isn't exactly hard to find but they were randomly inserted in later versions of the set that year and may not have been as readily seen as the base cards. That produced something of a "what is THIS?" feeling when pulling the Traded cards. Aside from that, Gamble is goofily airbrushed into a Yankees cap and barbershop cape. All of this is happening while Gamble's Afro was at its most prominent stage. The card isn't rare, but fans of the '70s love it like no other and it's well worth the 5 or 6 bucks to add one to the collection.

That "nuclear moment": I think it was when baseball card blogs began. Gamble's traded likeness started popping up everywhere between 2006-09 and hasn't stopped since.

This card's impact today: For many people -- I haven't decided if those "people" are those who lived through the '70s or those who don't remember it -- this card symbolizes the decade above any other. In a decade of questionable hair, clothes, artistry and newspaper headlines, this card has it all.

This card's impact today, Part 2: Someday I am doing a post devoted to sets that use the newspaper theme. This is one of the most-often cited examples.

Something about this card that I think no one else has ever said: The card number on the back is "74T," which is also my shorthand for 1974 Topps, which featured the first traded set. I know I'm the only one who thinks that's cool, but there it is.

On the 1-25 iconic scale (with 25 being the most iconic): Although I prefer Gamble's 1975 Topps card, this card is a 25, without a doubt.


Please meet: 1977 Topps Oscar Gamble

Why it's not iconic: The 1977 set, although greatly respected and admired by someone like me who was 11 at the time, is less-than-memorable. And although Yankees fans no doubt were eager to see Gamble's first card in a true Yankee uniform, it's not as spectacular of a card as Gamble's immediately preceding trifecta:

Part of this is because of the understated 1977 Topps design and another part of is because Gamble was a member of the Yankees and Yankee rules ban hair fun. So Gamble's fro was toned down. Fortunately, Topps chose a profile view of Gamble to showcase his still-remaining sideburns. But as a whole, it's a lot less flashy than previous Gamble cards.

What Topps was doing here: I don't think they were "doing" anything. The '70s wasn't a time for being ironic and self-aware on baseball cards. That didn't really start until the '80s.

What Topps probably also did: Took a photo of Gamble hatless in case he changed teams again -- which did happen, but Topps went with the airbrushed cap again in 1978.

Something I can say about this card to make it interesting: It's not a bad shot as I appreciate the park stretching beyond Gamble in the background, as if you are wondering where Gamble is gazing. I'm hoping that's the reason Gamble's image isn't centered, anyway.

On the 1-25 iconic scale: I'll give it an 8.

It's a somewhat memorable card as Gamble's first Topps card in a real Yankee uniform. But it doesn't scream "1970s."


madding said…
I think Beckett is responsible for the "Rick Face" designation. I remember them listing the error card as such soon after it was discovered. No idea why. I thought it was hilarious as a 13 year old.
The '77 wasn't great, but a few several years later were still pretty good. 1980 and 1981 Topps weren't too bad.

Popular posts from this blog

That was easy

   My approach on 2021 Topps, after seeing the cards, empty shelves and the tales of inflated prices, was that I could last the entire year without buying any.   The effort wasn't worth it. I'll just take my Dodgers and go home.   I went to Target once after the release date a couple weeks ago, I don't really remember what day I went, and saw empty shelves and shrugged.   So, move forward two weeks and it's birthday season. Those who have read this blog for awhile know I have a lot of birthdays in my family in March and it's the primary shopping time of the year, besides Christmas. I went to Target yesterday for a few items and I made sure to check the card aisle, just in case. I didn't expect to find anything, but I think you know me by now, I have to buy my first packs of the season if I have the opportunity. It's worth a look. The shelves seemed fairly empty as I approached. But they weren't. When I got there, I saw maybe six or seven 2021 Topps baseb

Reliving my childhood isn't easy

  My favorite part of collecting cards doesn't have to do with collecting current players, rookie cards or prospecting.   Although I pay attention to and buy modern cards and also seek out cards from before I was collecting or even before I was born, none of those cards are why I'm doing this.   The best part of collecting for me -- where the warm fuzzies reside, what I'd save for myself after chucking the rest of my collection -- is any card that was released when I was a child or young teen. I don't think I'm special in that way. A lot of collectors probably feel that way. But, unlike, say, the adult who grew up during the junk wax era, who can open pack after pack of 1990 Donruss and get that nostalgic rush without fear of packs ever disappearing, it's a little more difficult for me. I can go to a discount store a couple of miles away in town and grab some 1988 Donruss packs (I think I can still do that, who knows with the hobby weirdness lately). But there&#

G.O.A.T, the '80s: 20-11

  Big news at the night owl nest today. I subscribed to MLB.TV. Finally, I can watch any game I want this season. I no longer have to suffer with seeing the Mets play the Marlins for the 197th time or grit my teeth through Michael Kay because there's no baseball to watch anywhere else. I can ignore the Yankees for 162 games if I want! And that's what I plan to do. The Phillies-Orioles spring training game is on right now and then I'll search out something even more obscure later. I know, I know, I'm late to the party. That's the way it's been when it comes to entertainment viewing for most of my life. Taking years to land an MLB subscription was more of a cash-flow issue, but when I was younger, I'd miss out on the popular movies all the time because of a relatively sheltered existence. While high school classmates were quoting lines from Caddyshack and Stripes in the lunch room and on the school bus, I knew mostly Star Wars movies and E.T. HBO was the big t