Skip to main content

No foolin'

Tell me, veteran card bloggers, do you ever think back to the days when you had no blog, when you collected in a vacuum, when no one heard your plaintive cries of "look Aaron Rowand is wearing a glove on his HEAD!"

In those days, if someone told you all you had to do was write about cards in a public forum in order to find other collectors and build your collection, you would treat it like the joke that knew it was. In fact, if you received that information, this very day, you'd be certain that you were being pranked.

Well, I don't do pranks. It's mean and a waste of time. So when I say I get cards because I write about cards on a blog, there is no joke, no catch, no under-the-table dealing, no kickbacks, no shady stuff, no auto dealership fine print, no snickering, no nothing.

It's simple: write about cards publicly, get cards.

Pretty cool, huh?

I'll show you how cool.

I received a bunch of cards from Dave a week or two ago. It's filled with stuff I want.

For example, 1981 Donruss needs.

The want list for that set is now down to 10 bat-on-shoulder/blurry photo cards.

Night cards. There were a lot more than these. I'm sure some Reds fan just freaked out because they discovered they need a Pirates card for their team collection.

Current team-set needs in tower form. Only half of the tower is currently disabled.

Non-licensed rookies. These are as exciting as those first packs of 1991 Donruss that I bought -- meaning they're laughably terrible. But collect the Dodgers we must. That way, I always win.

Mid-'90s Finest team needs. The Brett Butler completes the '94 Finest team set, which is very exciting as it's one of my favorite Finest sets of all-time.

This Valdes card completes the 1996 Dodgers Chrome set. I have nothing more nice to say about Valdes or '96 Chrome.

Lots of Dodgers randomness in the package. The thrill of cards like these is determining whether you need them or not (I need them both). It's like going on tiny treasure hunts over and over.

Sabres cards? Yup, there were several. I need cards of past Sabres stars to comfort me when Buffalo bungles the No. 1 or No. 2 pick in the draft (not saying they'll bungle the pick -- it's what happens afterward).

More Buffalos. This is when the notorious O.J. was at his peak. That was many, many TV court shows ago.

'69 Pilots! OK, it's just one here, but he's got a three-letter last name! And he's one of the few Pilots in the 1969 set to actually be wearing a Pilots uniform. Sure, it's a spring training uniform, but those look better than what they wore during the season.

A much-appreciated Dodger need, since my '71 Buckner (yeah, yeah and Enzo and Marty) has been residing in my 1971 complete set. I love how fresh and clean this card is.

'70s Kellogg's cards are the best cards. I don't even care if he was beating the Dodgers in the '74 World Series at the time this card was in cereal boxes.

Two guys named Roy and the player that I want is obscured by the O-Pee-Chee logo. Not even all of the pretty colors can stop making me question the point of this card.

Speaking of OPC, Dave sent a large stack of black-bordered parallels from the '09 set. I don't know where he finds these cards, but it's about time the want list showed its face.

The '59 World Champions on the 1960 Dodgers team card. Koufax has got to be in there somewhere.

I neglect 1955 Topps Dodgers, which I shouldn't do considering what they did that year. Fortunately, others compensate for my failings.

This 1954 Bowman Don Newcombe is in wonderful shape (you can barely see the creases). It's actually my second '54 Bowman Newcombe, which allowed me to do this:

Either '54 Bowmans varied in size, or someone trimmed a border on one of the Newcombes.

Dave apparently thinks I'm going to complete the 1952 Topps Dodgers set. I appreciate his optimism. I'm not nearly as hopeful. But I could stare at the Preacher Roe card all day.

Final card. It's a great one.

This is a 1940 Play Ball card of Dolph Camilli, the man who would win the N.L. MVP award for the Dodgers the very next year. (This card is odd because it looks as if a bat has been drawn into Camilli's hands and then erased -- and it's not just on this card, it's on ever '40 Play Ball Camilli that I've looked up online).

Camilli is a favorite of mine because of his ability and also because he refused to report to the Giants when he was traded to the team in 1943 because he HATED them.

And now -- finally -- I have a card of Camilli from his playing days.

I'm telling ya, there was even more stuff in this package than what I showed.

This isn't a scam or an elaborate ruse. I'm not cackling as I write this. It's for reals.

In fact, a rather large box arrived in the mail for me this very day.

Those of you without a blog probably don't believe me.

But card bloggers know better.

If you doubt me, check back in about a week or so when the contents are displayed on this blog.

Then you'll know: there's no foolin'


Tony L. said…
What an AWESOME box that was. The 1940 Play Ball card...I'm not even sure I've ever seen one of those roaming freely in the wild or at card shows. And the black-bordered OPCs are just incredible.

The 1952 Topps ain't bad either! :-)
Mark Hoyle said…
Love the Playballs. It's one of my favorite sets, still have a couple of T. Williams cards left to complete the Sox in the three year run. As much as people dog the 52 set. They look great when you actually have them in your hand
JediJeff said…
So much Comiskey Park background goodness on the 81 Donruss......
What a great box. I was also very pleased to see the Dave Stewart card. Dave graduated from my high school and in 1982 he visited the school while the Dodgers were in town to play the Giants, so he was interviewed by our newspaper editor. I was on the staff, as the headline editor, so I had the pleasure to watch the interview. I've been a Stewart fan since. It was even greater to have him play for the hometown A's as a major contributor to the team's success in the late 80' and early 90's. It was a great time for all alumni (Go Mustangs!!!) to share in his success. Dave was a great pitcher, just look at his stats and of course there is his no hitter. He was very competitive.
It was also great to see the Catfish Hunter and the OJ. cards. I remember pulling that O.J. card and thinking how magical its was to hold that card. O.J. was a.great icon at the time and his accomplishments on the field were so impressive to us kids.
'94 Finest really was one of the greats. I love '95, too, but I don't hear quite as much love for that one. The plethora of miscuts in that set didn't help.
Big Tone said…
Was there really a protective covering on those Finest cards?I tried to peel and remove It off of some I have ,but to no avail.
night owl said…
Yes, for several years in the '90s there was a protective covering. I usually remove them. It's kind of tedious to do and you have to be careful not to bend a corner.
Dave said…
I intended the Gil to be a "one and done" until I saw the two player rookie card in 1967 Topps. I'm assuming I didn't strike out on Mike Compton, though...

Popular posts from this blog

That was easy

   My approach on 2021 Topps, after seeing the cards, empty shelves and the tales of inflated prices, was that I could last the entire year without buying any.   The effort wasn't worth it. I'll just take my Dodgers and go home.   I went to Target once after the release date a couple weeks ago, I don't really remember what day I went, and saw empty shelves and shrugged.   So, move forward two weeks and it's birthday season. Those who have read this blog for awhile know I have a lot of birthdays in my family in March and it's the primary shopping time of the year, besides Christmas. I went to Target yesterday for a few items and I made sure to check the card aisle, just in case. I didn't expect to find anything, but I think you know me by now, I have to buy my first packs of the season if I have the opportunity. It's worth a look. The shelves seemed fairly empty as I approached. But they weren't. When I got there, I saw maybe six or seven 2021 Topps baseb

Reliving my childhood isn't easy

  My favorite part of collecting cards doesn't have to do with collecting current players, rookie cards or prospecting.   Although I pay attention to and buy modern cards and also seek out cards from before I was collecting or even before I was born, none of those cards are why I'm doing this.   The best part of collecting for me -- where the warm fuzzies reside, what I'd save for myself after chucking the rest of my collection -- is any card that was released when I was a child or young teen. I don't think I'm special in that way. A lot of collectors probably feel that way. But, unlike, say, the adult who grew up during the junk wax era, who can open pack after pack of 1990 Donruss and get that nostalgic rush without fear of packs ever disappearing, it's a little more difficult for me. I can go to a discount store a couple of miles away in town and grab some 1988 Donruss packs (I think I can still do that, who knows with the hobby weirdness lately). But there&#

G.O.A.T, the '80s: 20-11

  Big news at the night owl nest today. I subscribed to MLB.TV. Finally, I can watch any game I want this season. I no longer have to suffer with seeing the Mets play the Marlins for the 197th time or grit my teeth through Michael Kay because there's no baseball to watch anywhere else. I can ignore the Yankees for 162 games if I want! And that's what I plan to do. The Phillies-Orioles spring training game is on right now and then I'll search out something even more obscure later. I know, I know, I'm late to the party. That's the way it's been when it comes to entertainment viewing for most of my life. Taking years to land an MLB subscription was more of a cash-flow issue, but when I was younger, I'd miss out on the popular movies all the time because of a relatively sheltered existence. While high school classmates were quoting lines from Caddyshack and Stripes in the lunch room and on the school bus, I knew mostly Star Wars movies and E.T. HBO was the big t