Skip to main content

The easy half

If you've ever bought a repack, whether in box or pack form, you have probably pulled what is referred to as a Hygrade card.


For whatever reason, the Standard Catalog of Baseball Cards is reluctant to call these cards that. Under "Hygrade," it refers you back to a set called "Baseball's All-Time Greats," which is the title that runs at the top of every card.

But Hygrade is the company that issued this set. The Hygrade Sports Card Company put out its own price guides and also this set of legendary players.

The set was issued as part of a "beginner's baseball card kit," along with an album, in 1987. Those 50 cards are found more frequently than the second half of the set. That's right, there's a first half and a second half. The second half of 50-plus cards (I think it's 51, although I get conflicting reports) was issued an undetermined number of years later. And although nobody calls cards from the second half of the set "rare," the prices for those cards are a little higher than for the first half. If you do a tour of COMC, every sold-out Hygrade card is from the later-issued cards.

I didn't know any of this a couple of weeks ago. Then a pair of events conspired to get me to read up on this late '80s oddball, with the strangely-cut cards, differences in card stock, green or orange borders, and even some variations in photos for individual players.

First, I nabbed the Hygrade Gil Hodges card in my "Under 50 Cents" quest from a few posts ago. I knew it wasn't as easy to find as some of the other Hygrades, and GCA of The Collective Mind confirmed it and informed me there were two separate issues of the set, which I didn't know before. He also said the second set of harder-to-find cards contained more recent players.

Second, John of Johnny's Trading Spot held a contest a little while ago, which I won. My prize was 50 cards from the Hygrade Baseball's All-Time Greats. So this was the perfect opportunity to figure out: 1) which set I had; and 2) whether one set had more recent players than the other one.

I decided to separate the cards I received by decade. Obviously a number of players in the set played in multiple decades. But I separated by the decade with which I associated the player. For example, Babe Ruth played in the 1910s, 1920s and 1930s. But I associate him with the '20s.

OK, here we go:

1900s


The set is a mixture of photographs and drawings, obviously with most of the drawings from early in the 20th century. Still I appreciate the photographs more.

1910s


The cards, although approximately the same size, simply don't line up on the scanner unless I put them in pages (and I was too lazy for that).

1920s


Already I was getting a pretty good idea that this was not the set with "more recent" players. Nineteen of the 50 cards are from the first three decades of the 1900s.




1930s


 Sometimes a single event, like for Harnett and Hubbell, cements them in a particular decade. And then there are players like Jimmie Foxx where I could go either way.



1940s


Some of the cards, like the Jackie Robinson, come with an orange border. From what I've read, that was a promo set. I have no idea how it was issued, but there are far fewer of the orange cards than the green ones (The SCOBC lists just four orange variations for the set).

1950s


Probably could have put Musial in the '40s. Probably could have put Banks or Mays in the '60s. This is not an exact science.

1960s


I associate a few of these guys more with the '70s. But if I'm being fair to their careers, they're '60s guys, even though Kaat is wearing a '70s White Sox uniform. (There is another Kaat card in this set in which he's wearing a Cardinals uniform, which is from the '80s).

So those are all of the cards I received from John.

Here is a list of the second half of cards from the set, by decade:

1900s - Honus Wagner, Cy Young
1910s - none
1920s - none
1930s - Dizzy Dean, Leo Durocher, Ernie Lombardi
1940s - Lou Boudreau, George Kell, Pee Wee Reese, Enos Slaughter
1950s - Richie Ashburn, Joe Adcock, Luis Aparicio, Hank Bauer, Rocky Colavito, Alvin Dark, Larry Doby, Carl Erskine, Carl Furillo, Gil Hodges, Monte Irvin, Al Kaline, Ted Kluszewski, Eddie Lopat, Billy martin, Eddie Mathews, Robin Robers, Bobby Shantz, Bobby Thomson, Early Wynn
1960s - Richie Allen, Lou Brock, Jim Bunning, Don Drysdale, Curt Flood, Bob Gibson, Juan Marichal, Roger Maris, Bill Mazeroski, Tony Oliva, Frank Robinson, Hoyt Wilhelm
1970s - Johnny Bench, Rod Carew, Jim Hunter, Joe Morgan, Thurman Munson, Jim Palmer, Gaylord Perry, Boog Powell, Tom Seaver, Willie Stargell

So, obviously, the set that I don't have has the more recent players. There are no '70s-based players in the set that I have (although a cased could be made). But there are 10 players from the '70s among the cards I lack.

I'm probably not interested in getting the second set of cards, other than the Dodgers I don't own (Drysdale, Erskine, Reese and Hodges, as well as a different photo of Duke Snider).

The main goal has been reached: I know a lot more about Hygrades than I did two weeks ago. 

Comments

I think I have a 50 card orange set too. Now I have to go find them cause now I am curious.
Anonymous said…
Interesting... I had assumed that they were all pretty much so common as to be worthless, I had no idea there was a second series. Now where did I put that small stack of Hygrades I have...?
GCA said…
Should only be five orange ones...

Now that you know the basics of the set, how 'bout the variations? :)

Actually, for you there's only the orange Jackie and the Duke Snider with the hat logo visible beneath the BBATG logo...
Bo said…
What you have is the first half. I got that collectors kit in 1987, the first year I started collecting cards. I learned a lot about old-time baseball players from that set.

Popular posts from this blog

Stuck in traffic with Series 2

In the whirlwind that has been my life this month, I found myself going absolutely nowhere for a portion of Thursday afternoon. I was in the middle of yet another road trip, the third one this week. This one was for work, and because it was job-related, it became quickly apparent that it would be a waste of time. The only thing that could save it was a side visit to the nearby Walmart to see if I could spot some Topps Series 2. I found it right away, which was shocking as I was pretty much in the middle of the country, where SUVs share the road with tractors and buggies. Who knew that the Amish wanted Series 2, too? The problem was getting back into civilization to open the contents of the 72-card hanger box I bought. The neighboring village is undergoing a summer construction project smack in the middle of downtown. It's not much of a downtown, but the main road happens to be the main artery in the entire county. Everyone -- and by everyone I mean every tractor trailer ha

Heading upstate

  Back in 1999, Sports Illustrated published an edition at the end of the year rating the top 50 athletes of the century for every state.   As a lifelong Upstate New Yorker, I braced for a list of New York State athletes that consisted almost entirely of downstate natives, that is, folks from the greater NYC area and Long Island.   We Upstaters are used to New York City trampling all over the rest of the state. They have the most people, the loudest voices. It happens all the time. It's a phenomenon unique to this state. Heck, there are still people out there who, when you tell them you're from New York, automatically think you're from NYC. They don't think of cows and chickens when they think of New York. But trust me, there are a lot of cows and chickens in New York State. Especially cows.   So, anyway, when I counted up the baseball players that SI listed as the greatest from New York State, six of the nine were from New York City or Long Island. I was surprised all

G.O.A.T, the '80s: 30-21

  I often call this current period of the television sports calendar the black hole of sports programming. The time between the end of the Super Bowl and the beginning of televised Spring Training baseball games is an empty void when I'm looking for something to watch on traditional television. I don't watch the NBA and I find the NHL on TV holds my interest for maybe a period. College basketball I can't watch until the tournament. This didn't used to be as much of a problem back when I could turn instead to my favorite sitcoms in February. Do you remember when February was "sweeps month"? (Maybe it still is, I don't know). Networks would make sure that every top show aired original episodes that month, no reruns. So you'd always have something to view during the week even when the sports scene was boring. (I know, people have multiple streaming viewing options now. But I find myself going weeks sometimes before I see something I want to view on Netfli