Skip to main content

The games 1970s card collectors play

OK, 1970s fans, tell me what these nine cards have in common.

If you collected in the '70s, this should be easy.

OK, time's up.

The answer is every one of these cards features a home run in the game that you could play on the back of the card!

For those who never came across a card from 1978 Topps, it featured a game on the back called "Play Ball". Each player's card displayed a particular baseball play on the back: single, double, triple, strikeout, fly out, ground out, etc.

We played this game many times in 1978 and I even played it once on the blog to answer the nagging question of what would the score be if you played a full nine-inning game from the beginning of the set?

But as I mentioned in that post, there were many other questions that I had regarding the game. For instance, those cards above aren't the only cards with home runs on the back. But how many were in the set?

Well, now I know. Because I counted them.

There are 36.

Which teams have the most? I know that, too.

The Indians, Phillies and Angels each have three cards with home runs featured on the back.

The Braves, Cubs and A's have no cards with a home run on the back.

When we were playing this game as kids we were convinced that there were far more doubles then there should be. So I counted the doubles, too.

There are 28. I don't know if that's a lot or not. I suppose I could count all the singles now to compare.

OK ...

There are 130 cards with singles. I think. I probably counted that wrong. But at least there are a lot more of those than doubles.

The other thing I was curious about was which team had the most productive cards in the game. My suspicion was the Yankees, since every time I turned over one of those cards it seemed to have an extra-base hit.

But I didn't know for sure. I wanted to know for sure. Fortunately, a blog is the perfect thing for such a task.

I went through every team in the '78 set and played the game with each team to determine how many runs each team would score. I played it like we played it when I was a kid. A single counted one base, a double two. No assuming someone could advance from first to third on a single. No assuming double plays or sacrifice flies. Three outs and that ended the rally.

It turns out the Yankees did OK, accounting for five runs. But they started fast and fizzled out as I got deeper into the set. The top team was a surprise. Here are the results:

1. Astros - 10 runs
2. Dodgers - 8
3. Orioles - 7
4. Red Sox - 7
5. Rangers - 7
6. Angels - 7
7. White Sox - 6
8. Phillies - 6
9. Pirates - 6
10. Cardinals - 6
11. Yankees - 5
12. Brewers - 5
13. Twins - 5
14. A's - 5
15. Padres - 5
16. Cubs - 4
17. Royals - 4
18. Blue Jays - 4
19. Giants - 3
20. Indians - 3
21. Braves - 2
22. Expos - 2
23. Reds - 2
24. Tigers - 2
25. Mets - 2
26. Mariners - 2

Every team scored at least two runs.

There were some other things I came across when I was doing this, like the number of grand slams that occurred (5), and the fact that the Pirates took the longest to reach three outs (card #383 - Mario Mendoza, go figure - was the third out). But I think I've nerded out on this game for long enough. All of the nagging questions that have lingered since 1978 have been answered.

But for those who want to explore more, here is the running tally for each team:

Giants: BB, GO, K, GO, FoO, 2B, BB, 1B, 1B, K, 1B, GO, FlO, GO, FlO, FoO, 1B, K, GO, K, K, FlO, FlO, HR, 1B, K

Orioles: BB, K, 1B, 2B, HR, 1B, K, GO, 1B, 2B, 1B, 2B, GO, FlO, BB, 1B, FoO, 1B, FoO, GO, 2B, FoO

Braves: 1B, FoO, FlO, GO, K, BB, FoO, 1B, 1B, 1B, FoO, BB, BB, FlO, FlO, 2B, BB, FlO, BB, K, 1B

Indians: K, FoO, FlO, 1B, GO, FlO, 1B, GO, HR, BB, BB, 1B, K, GO, FlO, HR, FlO, 1B, FlO, FoO, FlO, HR

Red Sox: 2B, GO, BB, K, GO, FlO, FlO, FlO, 1B, FoO, GO, FlO, BB, FlO, 2B, 1B, GO, HR, FlO, 1B, 1B, GO, 1B, FlO, 1B, 1B, 1B

Astros: GO, 1B, BB, 2B, 1B, 1B, FoO, 2B, GO, GO, BB, HR, FoO, FlO, FlO, 1B, FlO, GO, 1B, 1B, BB, 3B, K

White Sox: 3B, BB, FlO, K, 1B, GO, BB, FlO, FoO, GO, K, GO, GO, 1B, 1B, 1B, FlO, FlO, HR, 1B, BB, GO, 1B, BB, K, FlO, BB

Expos: FlO, 1B, GO, 1B, 1B, GO, FlO, FoO, GO, GO, BB, 1B, GO, HR, K, FoO, FlO, HR, 1B, K, GO, GO, FoO, 1B

Yankees: HR, 1B, BB, 1B, GO, HR, K, 2B, FlO, 1B, FlO, GO, 1B, GO, GO, FlO, BB, K, FoO, GO, FlO, 1B, 1B

Cubs: FlO, 2B, 2B, BB, K, BB, BB, FlO, FlO, 1B, 1B, FlO, BB, 1B, FlO, 1B, 3B, GO, GO, GO, GO, 1B, BB, 1B, FlO, FlO, GO

Royals: 1B, GO, FlO, GO, HR, 3B, FlO, K, 1B, FlO, 1B, BB, K, K, K, 2B, 1B, 1B, 1B, BB, FlO, K, FlO, FlO

Reds: BB, 1B, 1B, 1B, FlO, GO, K, HR, 1B, GO, FlO, FlO, K, FoO, BB, GO, GO, 1B, GO, BB, FlO, 1B, GO, GO

Tigers: FlO, FlO, HR, 2B, 1B, FlO, FlO, BB, BB, FlO, 1B, FlO, HR, GO, BB, BB, BB, K, GO, 1B

Dodgers: GO, FlO, FlO, BB, HR, GO, BB, GO, GoO, 1B, GO, 1B, 2B, GO, BB, 2B, HR, 2B, BB, FoO, FlO, FoO, GO, GO

Rangers: 1B, FoO, GO, FlO, 3B, GO, 1B, FlO, 1B, 2B, FlO, 1B, FlO, 1B, 1B, 1B, K, FoO, 1B, FlO, HR, 1B, HR, GO, GO, 1B, FlO

Brewers: FlO, BB, FlO, GO, FlO, 2B, 1B, HR, 1B, FlO, GO, FlO, 1B, FlO, K. GO, 3B, HR, K, GO, 2B

Mets: K, FlO, FlO, FlO, FlO, HR, FoO, FlO, 1B, BB, FlO, FlO, FoO, 1B, GO, GO, GO, GO, 2B, 3B, GO, K, 1B, BB, 1B

Phillies: FoO, GO, FlO, 1B, 1B, BB, GO, FlO, GO, 1B, FoO, FlO, HR, FoO, FlO, 1B, GO, FlO, HR, 1B, 1B, FoO, HR, K, GO

Twins: 1B, FlO, GO, BB, GO, 1B, FlO, 1B, GO, 1B, K, FlO, FlO, FlO, BB, GO, 1B, BB, 2B, HR, FlO

Pirates: BB, HR, FlO, HR, 1B, BB, 3B, GO, BB, 1B, GO, K, 1B, GO, FlO, 2B, K, GO, BB, K

A's: GO, 1B, 1B, FlO, GO, GO, 1B, GO, FlO, K, GO, 1B, FlO, 1B, BB, 1B, 1B, 3B, GO, 3B, FlO, FoO, 1B, FlO

Padres: BB, FoO, K, FlO, BB, BB, GO, 1B, HR, FlO, K, FlO, FlO, FlO, GO, FlO, 3B, BB, K, 1B, FlO, BB

Mariners: 1B, FlO, GO, 1B, K, HR, BB, FlO, 2B, 1B, FlO, FlO, BB, FlO, K, GO, BB, FlO, FlO, FlO, HR, K, FoO

Cardinals: HR, K, FlO, FoO, 1B, 1B, 1B, FlO, FlO, GO, BB, FlO, BB, 1B, FlO, HR, 1B, 1B, 1B, FlO, GO, BB, FlO

Blue Jays: FlO, GO, BB, FoO, FoO, GO, 3B, FlO, 3B, FlO, FlO, HR, 2B, FoO, 1B, HR, FlO, 2B, FlO, FlO, BB

Angels: K, 1B, FoO, 1B, 1B, K, FlO, HR, FlO, 2B, HR, 1B, FlO, FlO, FoO, 1B, 1B, FlO, 2B, 1B, 1B, FlO, HR, FlO

(FlO = Fly Out; FoO = Foul Out; GO = Ground Out)

It may not seem like I have a life after all of that, but I promise you that I do.


Mark Aubrey said…
Is that a typo? Is it "I have a life" or "I have a wife" after all of that?
hiflew said…
The combination of vertical and horizontal stripes on those Pirates uniforms are in the category of "so ugly they are fantastic" in my book. If I were a 70s kid instead of a late 80s kid, I guarantee you that I would have become a Pirates fan.
Nachos Grande said…
The Reds suck in this game too.
BaseSetCalling said…
I was trying to remember which set had this the other day … don't some other sets have something similar?
Zippy Zappy said…
If the Astros actually start earning ten runs a game they might not have to wait until 2017 for their first World Series title.
One argument I hear against modern cards is that they aren't "functional" enough. With every game televised and the internet to fill everyone in on stats, then who needs cards? Something like adding a simple game to today's cards would be too obvious. I'm not talking about a Pokemon-level "Topps Attax" game with insane rules that would turn our ADHD culture away in seconds. Take the exact game from '78 and you've done it. Your cards have an added purpose and incentive for kids to collect.

But that would be silly since handling your cards (much less playing with them) is a sin these days.
Ana Lu said…
Really, those were the days..
I think you've already talked about cards being for kids, here in the blog. But I think that even us adults would still play the game would Topps put it back on the card back.
I'm ok with stats but I miss more things like this in the card's back. At least it allows to make great posts like this one.
BobWalkthePlank said…
I want to buy a bunch of beat up 78's to play this game.
Tony L. said…
LOL -- I HAVE a bunch of beat up 78s BECAUSE I played this game as a 6-year-old in 1978!
GOGOSOX60 said…
I vote right now for 1978 to be included in 2015 Topps Archives set!!

Popular posts from this blog

G.O.A.T, the '80s: 30-21

  I often call this current period of the television sports calendar the black hole of sports programming. The time between the end of the Super Bowl and the beginning of televised Spring Training baseball games is an empty void when I'm looking for something to watch on traditional television. I don't watch the NBA and the NHL on TV holds my interest for maybe a period. College basketball I can't watch until the tournament. This didn't used to be as much of a problem back when I could turn instead to my favorite sitcoms in February. Do you remember when February was "sweeps month"? (Maybe it still is, I don't know). Networks would make sure that every top show aired original episodes that month, no reruns. So you'd always have something to view during the week even when the sports scene was boring. (I know, people have multiple streaming viewing options now. But I find myself going weeks sometimes before I see something I want to view on Netflix or Am

The return of COMC and a ridiculous collecting quest

  For the first time in exactly a year, I received a shipment of cards from COMC last week. I wouldn't say COMC is truly back back. I did pay extra for the express shipping so I wouldn't have to wait however long we're waiting for COMC shipments these days. But the cards arrived in short fashion and it was nice to see something in the mailbox from my preferred online card site for over a decade until last year. I had waited a year to order what was in my cart. I didn't want to be one of those people who paid and then waited nine months for shipment. I mean, what if I ordered them and COMC went under? Those were the kind of questions that were floating in my head last year.   That meant that I did lose a couple of items out of my cart, but no big deal. Nothing in there was anything highly sought-after and I merely replaced whatever I lost with a new version or something else I liked. Many of my collecting interests are not high on anyone's radar, especially 2020 fli

Say hey, you guys

  One of the most significant cards in my collecting history arrived at my door today. The 1956 Topps Willie Mays card ties my formative collecting days to my current collecting existence, confirms what I believe in in this hobby, and realizes dreams from long ago I never thought possible. It also sets a couple of personal records. It is the most I've ever spent on a single card. Yet it didn't hurt my wallet nor cause any regret. In terms of a cardboard acquisition it is about as perfect as it gets. No guilt. All power and beauty. It removes a considerable road block in my quest to complete the 1956 Topps set. It was one of the Big Three that I fretted over for years. "How would I ever obtain that card?" And now it's here. I don't have to remind you that baseball legends from the 1950s (and '60s and '70s) are departing at a rapid pace. That wasn't a top consideration in landing this card. But with Willie's age (he will be 90 in May) and the way