Skip to main content

My frustration in list form

As a fan who roots for the Dodgers, I find three recurring elements of the game more frustrating than any other.

The first is leaving runners on base. I'm sure every fan of every other team feels this way about their team, too, but the Dodgers I am positive have led the league in runners stranded for at least the last 35 consecutive years.

The second is seeing a pitcher that your team surrendered willingly turn around and beat your team. I witnessed this with Eric Stults just a couple of days ago. I could sit here for 15 years and not come up with a reason why the Dodgers couldn't hit Stults.

The third is seeing a pitcher own your team year after year as if the only reason for his career is to beat the Dodgers. I've been aware of this one since I could root for a specific team.

Over the years, I've come to know certain pitchers dominate the Dodgers. John Candelaria, Dennis Martinez, Mario Soto, Chris Carpenter. But I never had any numbers to back it up. Was it just a feeling I had that the Dodgers couldn't hit these guys or was it actually so?

This has gnawed at me for literally years. But the Stults performance and an article I read on Sports On Earth a couple of months ago, finally pushed me into action.

Which pitchers have performed the best against the Dodgers?

So, I went to and I made a list. I restricted the list to the top 30 pitchers. And each of those pitchers had to have thrown at least 100 innings against the Dodgers.

That eliminated a number of relief pitchers, a few of which I already knew did well against the Dodgers -- Scott Williamson, Floyd Youmans, Jeff Reardon. And this guy:

Al Hrabosky compiled a 0.92 ERA in 48 2/3 innings against the Dodgers.

There are also some pitchers who own the Dodgers who have not reached the allotted 100 innings, but when they do will definitely be on the list. Andrew Cashner (1.35 ERA) is one. Cliff Lee (1.48 ERA) is another. I hate seeing them in the "opposing pitcher" listing every time.

But the following are the top 30 pitchers with the most success against the Dodgers with at least 100 innings against them (yes, I fully realize I am defining success by ERA and there's probably a more effective tool, but I don't have the time to take a math class right now):


1. Hod Eller (1917-21, Reds): 1.28 ERA, 155 IP, 26 G, 11-7 W-L

2. Jon Matlack (1971-77, Mets): 1.81 ERA, 163.2 IP, 20 G, 12-5 W-L

3. J.R. Richard (1971-80, Astros): 1.86 ERA, 208 IP, 28 G, 15-4 W-L

4. Jeff Tesreau (1912-18, Giants): 1.90 ERA, 180.1 IP, 24 G, 12-9 W-L

5. Mike Cuellar (1959-68, Reds, Cardinals, Astros): 1.91 ERA, 113.1 IP, 26 G, 8-5 W-L

6. Hippo Vaughn (1913-21, Cubs): 1.97 ERA, 347.2 IP, 48 G, 22-17 W-L
7. Frank Miller (1916-19, 1921-23, Pirates, Braves): 2.02 ERA, 178.1 IP, 25G, 12-10 W-L
8. Fred Toney (1911-23, Cubs, Reds, Giants, Cardinals): 2.12 ERA, 326.2 IP, 45 G, 22-16 W-L
9. Pete Alexander (1911-30, Phillies, Cubs,  Cardinals): 2.15 ERA, 577.2 IP, 76 G, 45-19 W-L
10. Andy Ashby (1991-2000, 2004, Phillies, Rockies, Padres, Braves): 2.22 ERA, 125.2 IP, 21 G, 8-3 W-L

11. Ken Holtzman (1965-71, 1978-79 Cubs, also faced Dodgers in 1974 World Series): 2.24 ERA, 165 IP, 23 G, 14-5 W-L

12. Terry Mulholland (1986-1993, 1995-2001, 2006, Giants, Phillies, Cubs, Braves, Pirates, Diamondbacks): 2.25 ERA, 160 IP, 34 G, 9-7 W-L
13. Marv Grissom (1953-59, Giants, Cardinals): 2.26 ERA, 163.2, 50 G, 5-2 W-L
14. Gene Garber (1969-70, 1972, 1974-87, Pirates, Phillies, Braves): 2.27 ERA, 154.2 IP, 88 G, 11-6 W-L

15. Jake Peavy (2002-09, 2014, Padres, Giants): 2.28 ERA, 173.2 IP, 26 G, 14-3 W-L

16. Joey Hamilton (1994-98, 2001-03, Padres, Reds): 2.31 ERA, 109 IP, 16 G, 9-2 W-L
17. Ferdie Schupp (1913-21, Giants, Cardinals): 2.31 ERA, 175 IP, 27 G, 11-5 W-L
18. Slim Sallee (1908-21, Cardinals, Giants, Reds): 2.33 ERA, 231.1 IP, 40 G, 14-13 W-L
19. Dick Rudolph (1910-11, 1913-20, 1922-23, 1927, Giants, Braves): 2.34 ERA, 230.1 IP, 30 G, 14-12 W-L

20. Juan Marichal (1960-73, Giants): 2.36 ERA, 476 IP, 64 G, 37-18 W-L

21. Adam Eaton (2000-05, 2007-08, 2009, Padres, Phillies, Rockies): 2.37 ERA, 125.1 IP, 19 G, 10-3 W-L
22. Larry McWilliams (1978-89, Braves, Pirates, Cardinals, Phillies): 2.37 ERA, 121.1 IP, 24 G, 6-4 W-L

23. Dwight Gooden (1984-94, 2000, Mets, Astros): 2.38 ERA, 178 IP, 23 G, 14-5 W-L

24. Claude Hendrix (1911-13, 1916-20, Pirates, Cubs): 2.39 ERA, 176.2 IP, 26 G, 7-12 W-L
25. Ken Forsch (1970-80, Astros): 2.40 ERA, 221.1 IP, 60 G, 12-8 W-L

26. Dennis Martinez (1986-93, 1998, Expos, Braves): 2.40 ERA, 127.1 ERA, 22 G, 6-8 W-L

27. Bob Veale (1962-72, Pirates); 2.41 ERA, 220.2 IP, 37 G, 17-10 W-L
28. Woody Williams (1999-2007, Padres, Cardinals, Astros): 2.41 ERA, 130.2 IP, 19 G, 9-3 W-L
29. Phil Douglas (1914-15, 1917-22, Reds, Cubs, Giants): 2.42 ERA, 189.1 IP, 35 G, 14-13 W-L
30. Pete Schneider (1914-18, Reds): 2.42 ERA, 178.3 IP, 28 G, 12-10 W-L

The above 30 are the most despicable pitchers to ever take the mound. I spit on all of my dupes of them.

But before expectorating, a few observations:

1. As you can see, Martinez made the list just as I expected. John Candelaria did not, but he's not far off. He's 33rd on the list. I didn't find Mario Soto, and I didn't have the time to go looking for him, but one day I will.

2. I used Orioles cards of both Martinez and Cuellar because I was rushing. If I remember, I'll replace the Martinez card with an Expos Martinez card. As for Cuellar, I'd have go about purchasing a card of his prior to 1969 as I don't have anything of Cuellar earlier than 1971.

3. I listed only the years that these pitchers played for National League teams. I'm sure a couple of the more recent pitchers faced the Dodgers as a member of an American League team in interleague play.

4. There are a lot of pitchers from between 1910-20 when runs were at a premium. I suppose this is where one of those advanced stats would have been better than plain old ERA. But you don't come to Night Owl Cards for that.

5. I am not surprised by the number of Padres on this list. Andy Ashby, Jake Peavy, Joey Hamilton, Adam Eaton, Woody Williams. It just supports my theory that the Padres try against the Dodgers and don't against anyone else. Charming.

6. The Dodgers did that thing that a lot of teams do where they acquire a pitcher who does well against them, thinking they'll turn that magic against their opponents. The Dodgers picked up Ashby, Terry Mulholland, even Juan Marichal late in their careers. It didn't work.

7. I don't know how the Dodgers managed to step into a batter's box against J.R. Richard. Even as a kid I was well aware of how much Richard intimidated my team.

As painful as this list is, I'm glad I finally made it. I no longer have to wonder who is being a big meanie tormenting my team.

And it also gives me inspiration to figure out the pitchers who have done the WORST against the Dodgers.

That will be a lot more fun.

Now, excuse me. I have to spit on some doubles.


Anonymous said…
Craig Lefferts ( just misses making your list.... 96 1/3 IP, 10-2, 2.71 ERA, against L.A. That's pretty amazing considering he had a 3.43 ERA for his career and went just 48-70 (.406) against all other teams. Now that's one guy who seemed to make a career out of what he did against your Dodgers.

I expect you'll soon see Madison Bumgarner on there too, so far, he's 10-4, 2.54 ERA, in 92 IP.
Commishbob said…
Posting Orioles cards of El Presidente and Cuellar. I'm not sure if I should be happy or hacked since these are guys you hate. Feel free to pass along those Orioles cards if they bug you too much. ;-)
Jamie Meyers said…
Any list that has Hippo Vaughn on it is a good list.
JediJeff said…
I think JR Richards owned pretty much any team.
night owl said…
Lefferts: Another Padre!
steelehere said…
As soon as I saw where you were going with the post, J.R. Richard and Dwight Gooden came to mind. Steve Avery did as well so I went to baseball reference to look him up and I see he wasn't that far from making the list.
Mark Hoyle said…
A lot of these guys probably owned most teams
Anonymous said…
I was very happy to see two Mets on the list because I'm still pretty much pissed about 1988. :-)

Popular posts from this blog

Stuck in traffic with Series 2

In the whirlwind that has been my life this month, I found myself going absolutely nowhere for a portion of Thursday afternoon. I was in the middle of yet another road trip, the third one this week. This one was for work, and because it was job-related, it became quickly apparent that it would be a waste of time. The only thing that could save it was a side visit to the nearby Walmart to see if I could spot some Topps Series 2. I found it right away, which was shocking as I was pretty much in the middle of the country, where SUVs share the road with tractors and buggies. Who knew that the Amish wanted Series 2, too? The problem was getting back into civilization to open the contents of the 72-card hanger box I bought. The neighboring village is undergoing a summer construction project smack in the middle of downtown. It's not much of a downtown, but the main road happens to be the main artery in the entire county. Everyone -- and by everyone I mean every tractor trailer ha

Heading upstate

  Back in 1999, Sports Illustrated published an edition at the end of the year rating the top 50 athletes of the century for every state.   As a lifelong Upstate New Yorker, I braced for a list of New York State athletes that consisted almost entirely of downstate natives, that is, folks from the greater NYC area and Long Island.   We Upstaters are used to New York City trampling all over the rest of the state. They have the most people, the loudest voices. It happens all the time. It's a phenomenon unique to this state. Heck, there are still people out there who, when you tell them you're from New York, automatically think you're from NYC. They don't think of cows and chickens when they think of New York. But trust me, there are a lot of cows and chickens in New York State. Especially cows.   So, anyway, when I counted up the baseball players that SI listed as the greatest from New York State, six of the nine were from New York City or Long Island. I was surprised all

G.O.A.T, the '80s: 30-21

  I often call this current period of the television sports calendar the black hole of sports programming. The time between the end of the Super Bowl and the beginning of televised Spring Training baseball games is an empty void when I'm looking for something to watch on traditional television. I don't watch the NBA and the NHL on TV holds my interest for maybe a period. College basketball I can't watch until the tournament. This didn't used to be as much of a problem back when I could turn instead to my favorite sitcoms in February. Do you remember when February was "sweeps month"? (Maybe it still is, I don't know). Networks would make sure that every top show aired original episodes that month, no reruns. So you'd always have something to view during the week even when the sports scene was boring. (I know, people have multiple streaming viewing options now. But I find myself going weeks sometimes before I see something I want to view on Netflix or Am