Skip to main content

I wish this was a night card but it's not, and other night card pickiness

If you missed last night's post because of the problems with Blogger's reading list, you might want to wander down there for some quirkiness. I also added to the post at the end, by recording the total number of "balls in flight" for several sets. And I hope to add others.

OK, now ... this card.

I've received this particular card in well-meaning packages a few times now. I like it a lot. Who doesn't love a bank of illuminated lights? And the "thank you" on the jersey sleeve, well that could work for a variety of posts, and it just leaves a warm glow all over everything when you see it.

But it's not a night card.

You can see blue sky in the background. And clouds.

This is a dusk card. I don't collect dusk cards. I've gotta draw the line somewhere.

So are there other lines drawn in my random and arbitrary rules for night cards?

I'm glad you asked because I've been getting my share of cards lately that hover on the outer fringes of the night card kingdom in hopes of being let in the castle.

And I'm pulling up the drawbridge on them.

Somebody sent me this card recently. And by "somebody," I mean that's as far as I can narrow it down. They didn't leave a name on the return address label and the note said only this:

Yep. The lights are on. Nope, it doesn't count.

Sometimes I do think I should start a collection of Awesome Illuminated Lights cards. Then I remember what I have to go through to find cards for posts lately -- binder transferring, endless searching -- and the lights go out on that idea.

Fortunately, unnamed person from Dallas, Texas, found my want list and sent these key cards.

That's a bunch of 1996 Fleer needs along with one of those gold parallel Bowman cards from earlier this century that silly me has on his want list.

And this card completes the 1994 Select Dodger set for me. Please send me an email unnamed person so I can thank you and maybe send some cards. Sorry, night owl gets a little foggy and he's buried in cards.

OK, nobody in their right mind would consider this a night card. But it was sent to me by Jeff of 2-by-3 Heroes with an accompanying note that says "Dig all those night cards."

He's referring to the card back.

There's your nightness.

But that isn't good enough for the night card rules. I can't be displaying my night cards with the backs out.

So this one doesn't count either.

However, Jeff did say "all," which implies "a bunch."

So here's a bunch more:

Those are all certified night cards. There are few beauties there, too.

He also sent this 2013 Panini Prizm card that claims to show him in a Dodgers uniform.That looks much too much like a Royals uniform -- but we'll never know because of the glorious lack of logos.

Meanwhile, I also just received another big stack of night cards from my buddy Dave (wait until I show off that package hopefully next week, it's way too awesome). All of these are from this year's Bowman.

And that brings me to a change in my night card policy.

I used to save all the night cards I received to showcase on Awesome Night Card posts before throwing them in the night card binder.

But I'm getting backed up. There are so many night cards waiting to be featured on this blog and there's no way I'll get to them all. So I'm going to start putting them in the binder whether they've been showcased here or not.

Yes, I know your world has been turned upside down by this decision.

Please pull yourself together.

And know that I will happily take your night cards, even if you're not exactly sure what a night card is.


Stack22 said…
But Tom is Dee's dad. You should make an exception, if only to prove the rule.
Since you are not doing "Awesome Illuminated Lights", could you put Mark Lewis in a pile for me please !? I have the electric diamond version but not the base. I got your last package, great cards. Need to do a post along with some others I received. I also found something for you I think is really cool. Do you drink coffee or hot tea ?
acrackedbat said…
I'm unnamed in DFW, the night card failure. ;) Glad you rec'd the cards. Another very small selection mailed yesterday. Apparently in a shyer moment, I failed to leave my name and address. Cracked I am. Email forthcoming.
Mark Aubrey said…
Zack Greinke is in a Dodger uniform. He was wearing #21 for LA. It was #23 for KC.
night owl said…
Set aside, BD. I don't drink hot stuff. But my wife is a coffee drinker.
night owl said…
Thanks for filling me in -- I figured it was someone who had contacted me recently.
I think that Bo Jackson must be an UD/Topps buyback sparkle SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSP because of the sparkle on his helmet. Or maybe not.
Fuji said…
It's sort of a relief knowing that I'm not the only one who's backed up.

Popular posts from this blog

G.O.A.T, the '80s: 30-21

  I often call this current period of the television sports calendar the black hole of sports programming. The time between the end of the Super Bowl and the beginning of televised Spring Training baseball games is an empty void when I'm looking for something to watch on traditional television. I don't watch the NBA and the NHL on TV holds my interest for maybe a period. College basketball I can't watch until the tournament. This didn't used to be as much of a problem back when I could turn instead to my favorite sitcoms in February. Do you remember when February was "sweeps month"? (Maybe it still is, I don't know). Networks would make sure that every top show aired original episodes that month, no reruns. So you'd always have something to view during the week even when the sports scene was boring. (I know, people have multiple streaming viewing options now. But I find myself going weeks sometimes before I see something I want to view on Netflix or Am

The return of COMC and a ridiculous collecting quest

  For the first time in exactly a year, I received a shipment of cards from COMC last week. I wouldn't say COMC is truly back back. I did pay extra for the express shipping so I wouldn't have to wait however long we're waiting for COMC shipments these days. But the cards arrived in short fashion and it was nice to see something in the mailbox from my preferred online card site for over a decade until last year. I had waited a year to order what was in my cart. I didn't want to be one of those people who paid and then waited nine months for shipment. I mean, what if I ordered them and COMC went under? Those were the kind of questions that were floating in my head last year.   That meant that I did lose a couple of items out of my cart, but no big deal. Nothing in there was anything highly sought-after and I merely replaced whatever I lost with a new version or something else I liked. Many of my collecting interests are not high on anyone's radar, especially 2020 fli

Say hey, you guys

  One of the most significant cards in my collecting history arrived at my door today. The 1956 Topps Willie Mays card ties my formative collecting days to my current collecting existence, confirms what I believe in in this hobby, and realizes dreams from long ago I never thought possible. It also sets a couple of personal records. It is the most I've ever spent on a single card. Yet it didn't hurt my wallet nor cause any regret. In terms of a cardboard acquisition it is about as perfect as it gets. No guilt. All power and beauty. It removes a considerable road block in my quest to complete the 1956 Topps set. It was one of the Big Three that I fretted over for years. "How would I ever obtain that card?" And now it's here. I don't have to remind you that baseball legends from the 1950s (and '60s and '70s) are departing at a rapid pace. That wasn't a top consideration in landing this card. But with Willie's age (he will be 90 in May) and the way