Skip to main content

Team MVPs, 1989 Topps


It's time to figure out the best card for each team of my next complete set on the list, 1989 Topps.

Unlike the previous two sets I reviewed, 1991 Topps and 1993 Upper Deck, 1989 Topps is not known for its great photos. This set is at the tail end of an era in which Topps sometimes featured action shots and sometimes relied on standbys from the 1960s, cheesy, posed shots and portraits. Once Upper Deck and Stadium Club hit, a lot of that went away.

In fact, when I was going through my '89 Topps binder, I found myself looking at the cards in a different way than I had with the more recent complete sets. Instead of valuing action and creative new photography, I started admiring a player's smile or someone looking up in the dugout, because that's ALL YOU HAD back then.

But there are some decent cards in this set. I'm a little numb to it because I bought '89 Topps like it was bread and water, and there isn't anyone I know who collects bread and water. But after taking about 25 years to reflect, I can see some goodness in this set.

Once again, I broke the teams up by the divisions that existed at the time. AL East, AL West, NL East and NL West. (By the way, I excluded from contention the team leaders cards from this set. There are actually quite a few, nice action photos on these cards, but I didn't want to consider subsets because I didn't do that for any of the other sets).

I have yet to sit on the floor for any of these exercises. In fact, I think I'm backsliding. Instead of going through the cards at the dining room table like I have for the others, I looked through my '89 binder while slumped in a chair watching "The Muppet Movie" on Netflix.

Somehow that seems appropriate for '89 Topps.

Here are the cards:


American League East


Orioles: Terry Kennedy; Yankees: Don Mattingly; Blue Jays: Fred McGriff; Indians: Joe Carter; Red Sox: Dennis "Oil Can" Boyd; Brewers: Paul Molitor; Tigers: Chet Lemon

Team with the best cards: Red Sox. This is the sixth time I've done this series and the Red Sox have had the best cards 4 or 5 times. I'm trying to be impartial here, so even though I like the Red Sox, I'm pretty sure it's an objective evaluation.

Team with the worst cards: Tigers. They just edge the Blue Jays. For a long time I thought Sparky Anderson standing in the dugout was going to be the Tigers' best card.

Team I should go back and review: Blue Jays. I like the McGriff, but a lot of the Jays cards were similar.


American League West


Twins: Dan Gladden; White Sox: Daryl Boston; Athletics: Walt Weiss; Royals: Mike MacFarlane; Mariners: Jay Buhner; Angels: Chili Davis; Rangers: Oddibe McDowell

Team with the best cards: A's, probably. This was a weak division. White Sox and Mariners were OK, too.

Team with the worst cards: Angels. Lots of static shots.

Team I should go back and review: Royals and Rangers. I got transfixed by all the bats and the gum and blanked out on everything else. But I am still obsessed with the gum that McDowell has. If it is a piece of Topps gum, kudos to Topps for the product placement. If it is another brand, kudos to Topps for displaying a competitor.


National League East


Cubs: Damon Berryhill; Phillies: Mike Schmidt; Mets: Len Dykstra; Pirates: Bobby Bonilla; Expos: Mike Fitzgerald; Cardinals: Tony Pena

Team with the best cards: Expos. If you saw them all, you'd probably be annoyed that the Fitzgerald card is here instead. But I just love the Fitzgerald card.

Team with the worst cards: Mets. They have lot of action shots but they're all so boring. Guy standing at plate waiting for pitch. Whoopee.

Team I should go back and review: Phillies. Mike Schmidt historically was given lousy photos by Topps. It's shocking to me that there is a Schmidt card that is halfway representative of what he was known to do.


National League West


Braves: Steve Avery; Giants: Will Clark; Reds: Chris Sabo; Padres: Benny (Benito) Santiago; Astros: Ken Caminiti; Dodgers: John Tudor

Team with the best cards: Reds. Some good stuff, but it couldn't beat Spuds.

Team with the worst cards: Braves. The Avery card is borderline iconic. I was relieved to finally come across it at card #740 in the set, because before that, I was embarrassed for what I'd have to choose for the Braves. That said, I think picturing players in their high school uniforms on cards might be what got our hobby rolling downhill to the point it is at today.

The Padres cards weren't great either.

Team I should go back and review: Did I actually choose a Will Clark card as the best at anything? Clark with the squeaky voice and the personality of every character on "Survivor" that you hate? Yes, I did. (The Mike LaCoss card, in which he's showing his grip, is pretty good, maybe I should have picked that).


You may have noticed that four players with rookie cups made it as the best. I think Topps tried extra hard some years to give nice photos to its rookie cup players, and '89 Topps had a good crop of rookies.

So, there you are. Proof that you can find "the best" in a set where maybe photography wasn't at the level that we demand today.

But get used to it. Because next is 1988 Topps.

Comments

hiflew said…
I'm glad you picked the Damon Berryhill. I have always thought that was the best overall card of a very unremarkable set.

I also love the Oddibe McDowell, but not for the gum. I love the shirt that doesn't say baseball player. It says that Oddibe works for the Rangers' garage.

I am going to have to take a peek through my 89 Topps binder now.
Marcus said…
The Gwynn from the '89 Topps set is probably one of the worst Gwynn's ever. Not a lot of great Padres in the set, but I also liked the Mark Parent and Greg Harris cards.
Ms. Jess said…
I know you aren't a Giants fan but that Will Clark card is pretty sweet...
Anonymous said…
I've seen all the Expos and I'm annoyed. Fitz isn't top 3.

'89 was the first set to go with "Rock" and "Doc" for Raines and Gooden.
night owl said…
Well, I'd like to hear what's better. I briefly looked at the Floyd Youmans card, but every other Expos card looked no different than anything else.

Love the Fitzgerald photo. Classic spring training shot.

I documented the "Rock" phenomenon here:

http://nightowlcards.blogspot.com/2011/04/cardboard-appreciation-1989-topps-tim.html
Commishbob said…
Random thoughts.... Dan Gladden looks like Gary Busey in Rookie of the Year.... Mike Schmidt looks pretty small for a guy with his power... Caminiti got a lot bigger. I played golf with him once and he had some pretty awesome tattoos on his calves, and he hit the absolute crap out of a golf ball.... Len Dykstra ALWAYS looks obnoxious.
Anonymous said…
For the Expos I'd of gone with the "Bob" Rogers, edging out the Psacual Perez and "Rock."

I also don't think you can go wrong with any one of the ones featuring players in the red BP jersey, especially the Wallach, which is the best action shot Topps ever gave him. I love those red BP jerseys, and I'm pretty sure you've touched on that subject here before as we'll.

Anonymous said…
Interesting to compare my write up on this with yours. I do it completely differently, but I had the Bonilla and Schmidt as my top cards. I like the Schmidt, but I also like that it's his last card. It's true he didn't have many good Topps photos - he won "best card" in 2 of my sets. 1989 and 1986, which I think I would consider the 2 most mediocre sets photo wise I've done.

That Sabo is good, too. I still like the Eric Davis better. But I may be blinded by the fact that he was my favorite player at the time (though I think Spuds was probably a close second).

Popular posts from this blog

Stuck in traffic with Series 2

In the whirlwind that has been my life this month, I found myself going absolutely nowhere for a portion of Thursday afternoon. I was in the middle of yet another road trip, the third one this week. This one was for work, and because it was job-related, it became quickly apparent that it would be a waste of time. The only thing that could save it was a side visit to the nearby Walmart to see if I could spot some Topps Series 2. I found it right away, which was shocking as I was pretty much in the middle of the country, where SUVs share the road with tractors and buggies. Who knew that the Amish wanted Series 2, too? The problem was getting back into civilization to open the contents of the 72-card hanger box I bought. The neighboring village is undergoing a summer construction project smack in the middle of downtown. It's not much of a downtown, but the main road happens to be the main artery in the entire county. Everyone -- and by everyone I mean every tractor trailer ha

Heading upstate

  Back in 1999, Sports Illustrated published an edition at the end of the year rating the top 50 athletes of the century for every state.   As a lifelong Upstate New Yorker, I braced for a list of New York State athletes that consisted almost entirely of downstate natives, that is, folks from the greater NYC area and Long Island.   We Upstaters are used to New York City trampling all over the rest of the state. They have the most people, the loudest voices. It happens all the time. It's a phenomenon unique to this state. Heck, there are still people out there who, when you tell them you're from New York, automatically think you're from NYC. They don't think of cows and chickens when they think of New York. But trust me, there are a lot of cows and chickens in New York State. Especially cows.   So, anyway, when I counted up the baseball players that SI listed as the greatest from New York State, six of the nine were from New York City or Long Island. I was surprised all

G.O.A.T, the '80s: 30-21

  I often call this current period of the television sports calendar the black hole of sports programming. The time between the end of the Super Bowl and the beginning of televised Spring Training baseball games is an empty void when I'm looking for something to watch on traditional television. I don't watch the NBA and I find the NHL on TV holds my interest for maybe a period. College basketball I can't watch until the tournament. This didn't used to be as much of a problem back when I could turn instead to my favorite sitcoms in February. Do you remember when February was "sweeps month"? (Maybe it still is, I don't know). Networks would make sure that every top show aired original episodes that month, no reruns. So you'd always have something to view during the week even when the sports scene was boring. (I know, people have multiple streaming viewing options now. But I find myself going weeks sometimes before I see something I want to view on Netfli