Skip to main content

A cutting crisis


A few posts ago, I wrote a Blog Bat-Around on all of the various items I collect and in the process exposed what has been an ongoing crisis in my collection.

One of the things I collect is 1970s oddballs, specifically Hostess cards. And I showed some Hostess panels, which I picked up at the most recent area card show (way back in October).

Back on that post, I mentioned that those Hostess panels, as great as they are, would soon be cut into the more typical cards, as the dotted lines suggest. Whenever I obtain sheets or panels or what have you, the mission always is to reduce it down to its purest card form. I'm about the pure card, not the panel or sheet or box.

Or so I thought.

It's now been five months since I purchased those Hostess panels. And none of them are cut.

I can't do it. I just can't.


Something about these are simply too cool to alter.

It's not that I fear I'd make a mess of them. I'm sure I'd cut them straight and true. Yeah, I'd be a tad nervous, but I think I could get them all approximately the same size. I'm not some sugar-spaz 9-year-old kid anymore.

But I still can't do it.


They seem much more special in their untrimmed state.

Then I was reading someone else's blog bat-around. The Fleer Sticker Project mentioned that he owns a complete run (1975-79) of Hostess panels. Man, so jealous of that, and they look, so, so, so, so, so, so, awesome.

Maybe I should be trying to complete the '76 Hostess panel set instead of merely the '76 Hostess set.


That would kick serious oddball ass.

So I'm a bit stuck.


I already have these. A bunch of previously-trimmed 1976 Hostess cards.

Do I collect a trimmed set AND a panel set because I don't have the guts to cut the panels?

And what about these?


Do I maybe cut all the '76 Hostess panels because I have so many already-cut '76 Hostess cards and then keep the '79 panels intact?

What to do? What to do?

Yeah, I know, do what I want.

I just don't know what I want yet.

I'll let you know when I figure it out.

Comments

Mark Hoyle said…
I would leave them uncut. I think they fit in the three pocket horizontal pages. If you need some I can get them from my local guy
Section 36 said…
Agreed. Leave them uncut.
Commishbob said…
Don't cut 'em. They look terrific like that.
Tony L. said…
The answer is yes. Collect both versions. Why not? You need more to chase than just the (*checks Trading Card Database*) 110,000+ Dodger cards, after all, don't you?
Nick Vossbrink said…
Collect both but consider the set "complete" when you have the whole checklist between panels and cards.

I'm having this same dilemma with box-bottom cards myself.
acrackedbat said…
gotta say I like the idea of panels. I wouldn't dare cut them were they mine. I'm prone to spasms, which always occur at the worst possible moment. keeping scissors at bay!
night owl said…
I don't think I've seen three-pocket pages in the wild, so, yeah, I wouldn't mind some.
Adam said…
I say collect both the cut and uncut cards, that way you get the best of both worlds!
steelehere said…
Collect both. Consider one normal size and one 'Minis'. Plus as a bonus, you can collect the Hostess Twinkie versions which were individual cards.
A week ago I'd of said CUT em! Tonight I say build both sets.
Fleerfan said…
My vote is don't cut. You can always cut them later, but once you cut, the panel is gone forever. I keep them in the 3 pocket pages which you can pick up off Amazon:

https://www.amazon.com/Ultra-Pro-3-Pocket-Platinum-Pockets/dp/B00156X6BI/ref=sr_1_5?ie=UTF8&qid=1521515098&sr=8-5&keywords=ultra+pro+3+pocket+pages
Angus said…
I'd try to collect both. And I promise to point out any more uncut panels I see at any show that we're at together!
mr haverkamp said…
I cut my 75 set into singles as I was building it (as a kid in 1975), but the remaining years I kept them in panel form...and I have no regrets about either. Slowly been trying to finish the 78 and 79 versions, but they don't show up too often any more. I was so happy when I saw that you snagged the Cey SP card!
Billy Kingsley said…
Probably my second biggest regret in the hobby was separating the panel sets that I did- the SI for Kids cards and the 1996-97 NBA mini cards...and one of the Quads in 1996 Skybox USA basketball.

The panels are harder to store but I feel it's worth the effort.
Anonymous said…
I think this is a situation where one has to think beyond one's own lifetime... Someone in the 1970's had the foresight to not cut them into individual cards, it'd be a shame to undo that 40 years later and take a panel away from future collectors.
Old Cards said…
Don't cut. Collect both.
Jon said…
I completely agree with this sentiment.
GCA said…
Single cards aren't scarce by any means. Do a whole single set and if you have enough panels, go for that too.
Fuji said…
Fleer Sticker Project has a complete Hostess panel run from 75 to 79? That has to be one of the coolest projects around. I'm interested in whether or not you go for it, because if you don't... I might. Well... I'd probably just target the 1976 set.

Popular posts from this blog

This guy was everywhere

It's interesting how athletes from the past are remembered and whether they remain in the public conscious or not.

Hall of Fame players usually survive in baseball conversations long after they've played because they've been immortalized in Cooperstown. Then there are players who didn't reach the Hall but were still very good and somehow, some way, are still remembered.

Players like Dick Allen, Rusty Staub, Vida Blue and Mickey Rivers live on decades later as younger generations pick up on their legacies. Then there are all-stars like Bert Campaneris, who almost never get discussed anymore.

There is just one memory of Campaneris that younger fans most assuredly know. I don't even need to mention it. You know what's coming, even if Lerrin LaGrow didn't.

But there was much more to Campaneris than one momentary loss of reason.

A couple of months ago, when watching old baseball games on youtube hadn't gotten old yet, I was watching a World Series game from…

Some of you have wandered into a giveaway

Thanks to all who voted in the comments for their favorite 1970s Topps card of Bert Campaneris.

I didn't know how this little project would go, since I wasn't installing a poll and, let's face it, the whole theme of the post is how Campaneris these days doesn't get the respect he once did. (Also, I was stunned by the amount of folks who never heard about the bat-throwing moment. Where am I hanging out that I see that mentioned at least every other month?)

A surprising 31 people voted for their favorite Campy and the one with the most votes was the one I saw first, the '75 Topps Campy card above.

The voting totals:

'75 Campy - 11 votes
'70 Campy - 4
'72 Campy - 4
'73 Campy - 4
'76 Campy - 4
'74 Campy - 3
'78 Campy - 1

My thanks to the readers who indulged me with their votes, or even if they didn't vote, their comments on that post. To show my appreciation -- for reading, for commenting, for joining in my card talk even if it might …

Return of the king

(If you haven't voted for your favorite Bert Campaneris '70s card in the last post, I invite you to do so).

So you've been away for a few years and want everyone to know that you're back.

How do you do that?

Do what The Diamond King did when he returned to card blogging last month: Bombard readers with contests and giveaways! Well, you've certainly gotten MY attention, sir!

I'll start with the giveaways first. Since he returned, the Diamond King has issued multiple "Diamond King 9" giveaways, straight out of the chute and rapid fire in the last month-plus. As I've said before, I am very slow to get to these "first come, first serve" giveaways. I used to think "I spend too much time on the computer" and now I realize "I don't spend enough time on the computer at all!"

But I was able to nab two cards out of the many giveaways.


I won this key 1981 Fleer Star Sticker of The Hawk. I have since acquired several more &#…