Skip to main content

Awesome night card, pt. 86


I admit that I have favorites when it comes to baseball. I don't mean just a favorite player or team. I mean a favorite type of player.

I favor pitchers. And I don't try to hide it. I like pitchers more than hitters. I relate to pitchers more than hitters. I think pitchers are smarter than hitters. Generally speaking.

The players that I hold in the most awe, regardless of era, are pitchers. Among my favorite players of all-time are Sandy Koufax, Bob Gibson, Pedro Martinez and Greg Maddux. The 1978 season by Ron Guidry, the 1971 season by Vida Blue, the 1988 season by Orel Hershiser inspire more appreciation in me than the greatest home run performances of all-time.

When I go to the ballpark, I want to see 1-0 masterpieces. Leave the 14-13 trainwrecks to the ADD crowd, the rubberneckers who can only pay attention when it's FAST and LOUD. Give me Don Drysdale against Juan Marichal in 1966 when the average runs per game was something like 2.7 per team.

So, yes, I freakin' love what Roy Halladay brings to the game. A low-key master who will pitch as many innings as it takes and is so good that managers will suspend their knee-jerk reaction to yank any starter who might venture into the sixth inning. Halladay dares you to take him out.

Halladay is so good that he has legions of collectors. I can't keep Halladay cards in stock. And considering he spent the vast majority of his career in Toronto, not exactly the center of major league baseball, that is flat-out amazing. That's how good he is.

Halladay's perfect game on Saturday night against the Marlins was the third no-hitter this year, and a lot of people believe it won't be the last.

That is my hope, too. Remember 1990? There were seven no-hitters that year (one was a combined no-hitter by the Angels' Mark Langston and Mike Witt). The number was so remarkable that Score featured a subset in its 1991 set that included a card for every no-hitter. I loved that subset.

Here were the no-hitters that year:

April 11: Mark Langston/Mike Witt
June 2: Randy Johnson
June 11: Nolan Ryan
June 29: Dave Stewart
June 29: Fernando Valenzuela
Aug. 15: Terry Mulholland
Sept. 2: Dave Stieb

What an ass-kicking group of pitchers that year. Four in one month and two on the same day!

In fact, if you remember the Score subset, there were actually TWO MORE no-hitters that year, pitched by Andy Hawkins and Melido Perez. Hawkins lost his no-hitter after giving up 4 runs in the eighth inning, and Perez's was a shortened six-plus inning affair. MLB no longer recognizes them as no-hitters.

The following year, 1991, there were five one-man no-hitters, two three-man no-hitters and one four-man no-hitter. Here they are:

May 1: Nolan Ryan
May 23: Tommy Greene
July 13: Bob Milacki/Mike Flanagan/Mark Williamson/Gregg Olson
July 28: Dennis Martinez
Aug. 11: Wilson Alvarez
Aug. 26: Bret Saberhagen
Sept. 11: Kent Mercker/Mark Wohlers/Alejandro Pena

Aside from those two years, the only year there were more than 6 one-man no-hitters was 1884 when there were eight.

So are we going to get eight no-hitters this year?

I doubt it. But I certainly wouldn't think it was a bad thing. 

Chicks may dig the long ball. But I ain't a chick.

Comments

Two Packs A Day said…
Sucks that Halladay is a Phillie. He's been my favorite pitcher for the last several years. I used to snag certified auto cards for $4-5 when he was a blue jay. I haven't bought any certified auto cards of him since because card prices have risen since he moved on to a higher profile market and into a higher conscience of those that are not die-hard baseball fans.

I wish he stayed in Toronto so I could continue accumulating his auto/relic cards when almost noone knew who he was.

He's still my favorite pitcher so I congratulate him on tonight's effort and the season so far and it'd be okay if he won a world series ring as long as the phils don't have to deep-six the Dodgers in the playoffs on the way to a WS.
madding said…
I thought the Stewart and Fernando no-hitters in the same day was the most amazing thing. I was in high school. It was really painful to watch the Cards get no-hit by the Dodgers, though. I didn't get to see the Cards all that often back then, either.

I think it's impossible not to like Halladay, aside from the fact that he's a Phillie now.
Brian said…
Maybe now Doc will get the recognition as MLB's ultimate pitcher he so richly deserves.

As a staunch Jay fan, I've awed (?) at many of his masterful performances and, yes, I still "mourn" his passing to the Phillies. GOOD ON YOU, DOC!!!

May your success's keep on mounting!
I'm with you Owlie, I aint a chick and I love a good pitchers duel. I have seen two no-hitters in person and hope to see another one day. The suspense when a pitcher has a no-no past the 6th inning is great. I would rather piss my pants than get up and miss one second...

Popular posts from this blog

That was easy

   My approach on 2021 Topps, after seeing the cards, empty shelves and the tales of inflated prices, was that I could last the entire year without buying any.   The effort wasn't worth it. I'll just take my Dodgers and go home.   I went to Target once after the release date a couple weeks ago, I don't really remember what day I went, and saw empty shelves and shrugged.   So, move forward two weeks and it's birthday season. Those who have read this blog for awhile know I have a lot of birthdays in my family in March and it's the primary shopping time of the year, besides Christmas. I went to Target yesterday for a few items and I made sure to check the card aisle, just in case. I didn't expect to find anything, but I think you know me by now, I have to buy my first packs of the season if I have the opportunity. It's worth a look. The shelves seemed fairly empty as I approached. But they weren't. When I got there, I saw maybe six or seven 2021 Topps baseb

Reliving my childhood isn't easy

  My favorite part of collecting cards doesn't have to do with collecting current players, rookie cards or prospecting.   Although I pay attention to and buy modern cards and also seek out cards from before I was collecting or even before I was born, none of those cards are why I'm doing this.   The best part of collecting for me -- where the warm fuzzies reside, what I'd save for myself after chucking the rest of my collection -- is any card that was released when I was a child or young teen. I don't think I'm special in that way. A lot of collectors probably feel that way. But, unlike, say, the adult who grew up during the junk wax era, who can open pack after pack of 1990 Donruss and get that nostalgic rush without fear of packs ever disappearing, it's a little more difficult for me. I can go to a discount store a couple of miles away in town and grab some 1988 Donruss packs (I think I can still do that, who knows with the hobby weirdness lately). But there&#

G.O.A.T, the '80s: 20-11

  Big news at the night owl nest today. I subscribed to MLB.TV. Finally, I can watch any game I want this season. I no longer have to suffer with seeing the Mets play the Marlins for the 197th time or grit my teeth through Michael Kay because there's no baseball to watch anywhere else. I can ignore the Yankees for 162 games if I want! And that's what I plan to do. The Phillies-Orioles spring training game is on right now and then I'll search out something even more obscure later. I know, I know, I'm late to the party. That's the way it's been when it comes to entertainment viewing for most of my life. Taking years to land an MLB subscription was more of a cash-flow issue, but when I was younger, I'd miss out on the popular movies all the time because of a relatively sheltered existence. While high school classmates were quoting lines from Caddyshack and Stripes in the lunch room and on the school bus, I knew mostly Star Wars movies and E.T. HBO was the big t