Skip to main content

It's a living thing


This is my first card from Topps' Living Set.

I think by now everyone knows about this year's online tactic by Topps. Every so often, it issues three cards of current players on the 1953 design for an outrageous price and we're all supposed to whip out our debit cards before the LIMITED SUPPLY DISAPPEARS!!!!

I'm too old to play that game.

I haven't done it for Topps Now. I'm not doing it for the Living Set. I do not collect cards under a deadline.

Fortunately, Ben from Cardboard Icons sent me the Clayton Kershaw Living Set card. Ben's a Red Sox fan and he actually watched the Red Sox clinch the World Series in Dodger Stadium. Feeling extremely sorry for me (as he should) he sent me this card. ... Well, I don't know if he felt sorry for me. He's always been a good egg regardless, sending me cards when I don't expect it.

So I have one of these cards now and finally I can give you my feedback that you've been waiting for lo these many months.

We'll start with my first thought: "Well, I'm glad I didn't spend $14.99 for this card plus two cards of other players I don't care about."

But you knew that one already. As for the card itself, it's fine. I've never been a big fan of the 1953 set. It's one of the reasons I was able to resist the Living Set, I'm over the '53 design, just as I've been over the '52 design, thanks to Topps' endless odes to '52. Now, if Topps issued a Living Set with the 1975 design, I might be tempted ... might.

The card is slightly glossy on the front and features a rougher cardboard feel on the back. It's certainly not as weighty as a 1953 card. It's as thin as your average card from the 1980s, I'd say.


This is the back, true to the look of '53 Topps, although '53 wasn't 2 1/2-by-3 1/2.

You can see the signature is Kershaw's latter-day autograph, no bump for the "h" in the last name, just a straight line to the end. So many signings for stars these days, I'd say they're asked to sign more than ever.

I know I don't appreciate the cartoon very much, slapping a George Springer postseason trivia question on the back of a Dodger pitcher's card is plain rude (at least Kershaw never gave up a homer to Springer).

This happens to be my 621st Clayton Kershaw card. Ben also collects Kershaw cards and I'm guessing he has one of these already.

In the early-going of this set -- the premise is it never ends -- there is an inordinate amount of Dodgers. But I won't be tracking down any others. I've done quite well at ignoring these kinds of cards. It doesn't bother me in the least that I don't have the other 7 or 8 Dodgers Topps has created.

But I'm thrilled I have this card. If there is one Living Set card to get, it would have to be Kershaw. Nothing else makes sense.

So, there you are, the latest and greatest from 2018, shown about eight months too late.

Oh, one final thought:

"Living Set" is no less weird a name than the first time I heard it.

Comments

Mark Hoyle said…
I would never pay the 14.99 either. I’ve bought a few. Paid 5 bucks on eBay. I like the concept. We will see what the off season brings for this set.
Commishbob said…
That's one of the better ones I've seen. In general I'm not a fan of the artist(s) they use for this.
GOGOSOX60 said…
The 53 is such a wrong demographic for most folks under 60, hell may 65. If Topps was smart they should have gone with one of the biggest post war era sets the 1975 set as you stated.

Can't think of any other Topps set that's still in high demand and popular with even younger collectors too. I guess we should be lucky Topps didn't give us Living Set 1987 Topps!!!!
Nick Vossbrink said…
Like the idea of a living set. Not keen on using *any* old design since the point is that it's a timeless set. Definitely not keen on things like "past year" stats and RC designations on a set which isn't supposed to represent a specific year. And like you, I'm extremely turned off by the distribution and pricing.

I do like this kind of post though where you receive a card that comes from a set you don't collect, don't want, and don't like but are thrilled to have it. I've had many similar posts and reactions and walking that tightrope between saying why you dislike this set while also saying that you're not complaining at all about the mailday and in fact deeply appreciate receiving cards that you'd never ever buy is a difficult balance to pull off.

In some ways these are the best maildays since they allow you to enjoy and handle cards that you'd otherwise never own.
Fuji said…
I've wanted Topps to produce a Living Set for a long, long time. I just wish they executed it differently. I would have bought into it had it been distributed in packs. Oh well. My debit card isn't getting pulled out for these. Maybe I'll pick up a single one day off of eBay... but I'm not willing to pay a premium.
Brett Alan said…
Did anyone beside me take the trivia question to be suggesting that an Astro has the all-time record for postseason home runs? Not well written.
madding said…
No thanks! If someone wants to trade me one of these cards (or Topps Now or whatever) for a few set filler cards... sure, okay. I'm not going to kick them out of my collection. But I am super not interested in this stuff. If you tossed these cards in a dime box, they would barely stand out. Topps Now looks about as special as Upper Deck Documentary. These just look like one of their endless permutations of Archives or whatever. I seriously don't understand how they keep suckering people with this stuff.
Defenders50 said…
Wait, they have another set that uses their old designs? And they charge $5 a card for it? Are they trying to take a sledgehammer to the nostalgia that animates appreciation of their vintage stuff?
Toy Junkie said…
Hey don't knock the '87 Topps set I love the wood gain look of them :P
BaseSetCalling said…
I’m waiting for my card
Twenty-six dollars in my paypal
Sent to Whitehall Street, number one
Feel bored and dumb, more asleep than awake
I’m waiting for my card

Hey old white guy, what you doin’ outside?
Hey old white guy, you look silly out on your porch
Oh pardon me, I’ve got something on my mind
I’m just looking for a big, big hero of mine
I’m waiting for my card

Here he comes, he’s all dressed in blue
Tight looking shoes and a stripe on his pants
He’s never early but sometimes he’s late
First thing you learn is that you always gotta wait
I’m waiting for my card, ah I can’t take it no more

Up to a split level ranch and in my driveway
The neighbors all see this, but they don’t care
He’s got the package, it’s got what I need
No time for goodbye, I gotta find my scissors
I’m waiting for my card

Buddy don’t you laugh, ah bro don’t you snicker and giggle
I’m feeling good, you know I’m gonna get that thing open
I’m feeling good, I think I might start to drool
Until tomorrow’s Topps Now is up on the web
I’m waiting for my card

Popular posts from this blog

G.O.A.T, the '80s: 80-71

  The longer you've been alive on this planet the more perspective you have on what "a long time ago" means.   A person I know is a Tampa Bay Buccaneers fan. He's pretty young. He says he's waited a long time for the Bucs to appear in the playoffs. It's been agony, you see, waiting all the way since ... 2007! ... to see his team in the postseason. How has he managed? As a Bills fan, I know waiting. Buffalo spent 17 straight years out of the playoffs, a longer wait than any other team. The last time Buffalo made the AFC championship game, where they are now, was 1994. That was the month of the Northridge earthquake in Los Angeles. That was the month I moved to the town where I live now. That was the month of 20-below temperatures for a week straight. That was a long time ago! A fellow co-worker said prior to Sunday that a Bills-Browns title game would sum up the 2020 NFL season, implying that these teams never make the postseason. But again, this is another ca

G.O.A.T, the '80s: 90-81

  I've been watching the Netflix documentary series on the doomed Challenger mission, whose anniversary is 35 years ago this month. Depressing viewing, I know. I was a college student at the time and heard the horrible news as I was driving to the bank to cash a paycheck after classes. I can't imagine what it was like for all those school classrooms that had tuned in to watch the broadcast that day. The documentary is quite well done, so far. The footage is incredible. Not just from all the space shuttle technology video and the awesome lift-off camera work but the depth of it. Every astronaut's every move from student eight years prior to the fateful day seems to have been cataloged. Also the background music is spot-on as far as time period (always a big thing with me) and takes me right back to those days. As always, it's difficult to believe that Jan. 28, 1986 was that long ago. I can still feel 1986 in my heart and that year still seems like it was on the cutting e

Saving vs. waiting

  Hello, it's contrarian night owl here, telling another tale about how obsessed we are with saving our cash.   I can tell you're shocked already.   Saving is a good thing, right? It's the American way. Getting the cheapest possible deal on whatever you're interested in purchasing gets you a little gold star or check mark somewhere, correct? Actually, I don't think that's the way it works. Which is why I haven't been much for trying to find the cheapest way to buy cards. I've addressed this before . I see the point if you're on a strict budget or your job status is shaky or you're paying tuition for three kids in college. But saving for saving's sake I just don't get. Sure, I get excited when I find a deal on ebay. And I pat myself on the back when I discover a shirt I bought that I like was on clearance. But it's never the point of the sale for me. The point is: did I get what I want? Recently, I think I found another point, when it