Skip to main content

Updating before Update

This is me being picky, but if you've read this blog long enough you know that I tend to be picky. And yet you still read this thing ...

I just finished cataloging the Series 1 and Series 2 base cards that I have from 2013 Topps. It is usually at this time that I find whatever weirdness I overlooked when I was originally pulling cards out of packs.

Often, I'll come across something that boggles my mind. Like last year when I found a Wade Davis card in each series even though he didn't change teams, wasn't a star, or hadn't won any awards that would merit a second card. Just two Wade Davis cards for no apparent reason.

And there's been previous examples of that as I mentioned on that post, and others mentioned in the comments.

I didn't find anything like that this time, although it's still possible as I don't have all the cards in the set. What I did find was this Josh Johnson card in Series 2.

His base card pops up in Series 2 even though he already had a base card in Series 1:

This is card #255. The Blue Jays Johnson is card #473.

Now, I suppose there is justification for the second card because Johnson changed teams last offseason, so why not get him a card with his new team, right? Upper Deck did this quite often when it was issuing baseball sets.

But Upper Deck's sets were like 1,000 cards. They could do stuff like that. Topps is still refusing to issue cards of long relievers and backup catchers, yet we need an updated Josh Johnson card -- before Topps issues a card set called ... UPDATE.

The better thing to have done, of course, is not issue an outdated card of Johnson in Series 1 and just wait until Series 2 to issue the Johnson card (I know Topps must plan ahead with sets and maybe they couldn't pull the Marlin Johnson in time, but really there has to be a better way to do this).

Issuing a second Johnson card as a Blue Jay just looks panicky. Isn't this what the Update set is for? And how goofy does it look now that Johnson is a Padre? The rush to get him in Series 2 now seems pointless.

Yes, I'm being picky and asking for rigid definitions, like the way things were back in the day, when the way of card sets these days is to issue cards of squirrels and super shortprints and anything goes as long as we get our cash!

Sorry. I just like updated cards to be in Update.

Here's another example:

That's Michael Bourn with his old team and Michael Bourn with his new team.

Yet there they are BOTH IN SERIES 2.

One is not his base card. The card on the left is one of those extra "why is this card in the set when my favorite guy off the bench isn't" cards. Cool photo, without a doubt, but pretty much frivolous.

But it's very weird that there are two cards of Bourn in the same series with him wearing different uniforms.

I know Update these days is for five different cards of Strasburg-Harper-Puig and All-Star cards. But I miss when the Update set was for when you waited for guys in their new uniforms mixed in with some rookies.

I know, I know. It's not 1983 anymore.

Just me being picky.

Carry on.


Not to mention the 2012 Update card of Matt Albers, showing him with the Red Sox, even though he had been traded to Arizona at the trade deadline.
Even funnier is the fact that this is his only Topps card showing him with the Red Sox even though he had been on the team since the 2011 season and even pitched in 56 games that year.
hiflew said…
This isn't great, but it is better than in 2011 with two Jason Hammel "base" cards in Series 2, both with the Rockies. Not to mention the two appearances of Rafael Betancourt in 2013. He is in Series 2 and in Update, both with the Rockies and to make it worse the pictures are just about identical. Topps just doesn't even care, but I guess it has been that way for years now.
Don said…
At least they did not follow the example of 2007 Gary Sheffield. There is the EXACT same card in series 1& 2'
If you got a double of that Braves Born card, I'll take it. LOL
Fuji said…
You sir are the cardboard professor. It's amazing the stuff you come up with. Keep 'em coming sir. You can be as picky as you want when you're handing out awesome information like this.
Anonymous said…
I would really prefer they did the s1 and s2 cards in the player's uniform from the previous year, and any changes in update. That was always what Update was for. But that's probably just me being old and stodgy.

The Bourn card makes sense to me because it's a subset showing him winning Defensive POY. It makes sense they put him in his old uniform for the subset - he won the award with the Braves. But I wish he didn't have an Indians card until Update anyways.

I also wish the subsets looked different from the base set. I'd still incorporate pieces of the base design, but do something more to make them stand out!

Popular posts from this blog

That was easy

   My approach on 2021 Topps, after seeing the cards, empty shelves and the tales of inflated prices, was that I could last the entire year without buying any.   The effort wasn't worth it. I'll just take my Dodgers and go home.   I went to Target once after the release date a couple weeks ago, I don't really remember what day I went, and saw empty shelves and shrugged.   So, move forward two weeks and it's birthday season. Those who have read this blog for awhile know I have a lot of birthdays in my family in March and it's the primary shopping time of the year, besides Christmas. I went to Target yesterday for a few items and I made sure to check the card aisle, just in case. I didn't expect to find anything, but I think you know me by now, I have to buy my first packs of the season if I have the opportunity. It's worth a look. The shelves seemed fairly empty as I approached. But they weren't. When I got there, I saw maybe six or seven 2021 Topps baseb

Reliving my childhood isn't easy

  My favorite part of collecting cards doesn't have to do with collecting current players, rookie cards or prospecting.   Although I pay attention to and buy modern cards and also seek out cards from before I was collecting or even before I was born, none of those cards are why I'm doing this.   The best part of collecting for me -- where the warm fuzzies reside, what I'd save for myself after chucking the rest of my collection -- is any card that was released when I was a child or young teen. I don't think I'm special in that way. A lot of collectors probably feel that way. But, unlike, say, the adult who grew up during the junk wax era, who can open pack after pack of 1990 Donruss and get that nostalgic rush without fear of packs ever disappearing, it's a little more difficult for me. I can go to a discount store a couple of miles away in town and grab some 1988 Donruss packs (I think I can still do that, who knows with the hobby weirdness lately). But there&#

G.O.A.T, the '80s: 20-11

  Big news at the night owl nest today. I subscribed to MLB.TV. Finally, I can watch any game I want this season. I no longer have to suffer with seeing the Mets play the Marlins for the 197th time or grit my teeth through Michael Kay because there's no baseball to watch anywhere else. I can ignore the Yankees for 162 games if I want! And that's what I plan to do. The Phillies-Orioles spring training game is on right now and then I'll search out something even more obscure later. I know, I know, I'm late to the party. That's the way it's been when it comes to entertainment viewing for most of my life. Taking years to land an MLB subscription was more of a cash-flow issue, but when I was younger, I'd miss out on the popular movies all the time because of a relatively sheltered existence. While high school classmates were quoting lines from Caddyshack and Stripes in the lunch room and on the school bus, I knew mostly Star Wars movies and E.T. HBO was the big t