Skip to main content

The five stages of opening 2018 Topps

I found 2018 Topps around 1:30 in the afternoon yesterday. I have no adventures to tell. There were no pack searchers (I've seen a pack searcher maybe once or twice in my life). The merchandise appeared freshly stocked. Blasters, hangers and packs. In fact, when I pulled three loose packs out of the gravity feeder, I was the first customer to touch those babies.

I was first. There's your adventure.

A year ago, I took pictures when I found the first cards of the season. I had time. I was off that day. Yesterday, I worked a double shift because one of my co-workers is on vacation. Topps really needs to work on its release dates because, last year aside, this happens all the time. If they would just ask for my schedule I could get these posts up in a more timely fashion.

So, no pictures of stocked shelves this time, or conversations with the baseball-loving checkout girl. It was all "in, out, drive, open, work, work, work, work, WORK, WORK, WORK, WORK ..."

But I did scan everything for you.

And during all that scanning time, I had time to think. There are five stages to opening 2018 Topps:

1. Excitement
2. Frustration
3. Surprise
4. Bitterness
5. Resignation

I had just gone through all of them without knowing it. I'll go through them for you now. But of course, I'll throw cards in with the self-analysis, so you don't get squirmy.


Opening the first cards of the season is always exciting. No matter how old I get, no matter how jaded I get, no matter how out-of-sync I am with modern trends, seeing new card product on the shelves and opening that first pack and spotting the first card of the year is always exciting.

The Billy Hamilton card is the first card of the year. That might be the best "first card" I've ever pulled, certainly since I started blogging. I should review those and do a future post.

So, yeah, that was exciting. I saw the new design in person and it was rush.

But what quickly followed was ...


Ugh. I so wanted to enjoy opening these cards at my leisure. But there was no time. I quickly shuffled through the first pack. Who are these people? I know fewer and fewer players on cards, it gets so frus ...

Well, let's open the pack and I can explain better.

Pack 1

#68 - Billy Hamilton, Reds

#284 - Jose Pirela, Padres

I congratulated myself for knowing who a Padre was.

#42 - Cody Bellinger

Woooooooooooooooooo! First Dodger is the Rookie of the Year. Yeah, I know that's no feat when there are 47 Cody Bellingers in the set. I don't care. Wooooooooooooooo! Future Stars and Rookie Cups and Logos Oh My. Jammed all together so it makes no sense! But woooooooooooooooooooooo!

Let's look at the back of a 2018 card:

Don't let Bellinger's brief career fool you, the five-line limit for stats has returned. I still think that's not the right call, but, again, I get it. I just wish Topps would do something else with the leftover space besides the huge Twitter/Instagram handles (it really looks goofy when the player has no social media and #TOPPSBASEBALL is used in its place) and all that territory for the header. Also, that's some kind of creative white space on the right. We putting jersey swatches in there?

Finally, please note what's got to be the first use of the word "incongruously" on a baseball card. I've now had to look up that word three times to make sure I spelled it correctly. Yes, I've been writing for 30 years.

#316 - Max Fried, Braves

There are a boatload of cards with rookie card logos on them in this set. Topps is on record as being proud of this. Meanwhile, I have no time to figure out who all these people are.

#277 - Aaron Slegers, Twins

Moar rookie. No idea.

#TS-80 - Alex Verdugo, Dodgers, Topps Salute insert

Moar rookie. This is what the Topps Salute insert set looks like (this insert set is the most loosely defined insert series of all-time. "Let's put rookies, legends, throwback uniforms, Mother's Day uniforms, Father's Day uniforms, Independence Day uniforms, dogs that do handstands, and people wearing purple eating pizza in one set and call it 'Topps Salute'").

As pleased as I am to pull another Dodger, Verdugo should not be appearing in insert sets. He has 23 career MLB at-bats. And no guarantee he will be playing for L.A. this year.

#DJH-26 - Derek Jeter, 1996 World Series Champion, Derek Jeter insert set

This is what Target uses to punish you for buying Topps baseball cards. You get a Derek Jeter insert card. I'm starting to miss the old days of pulling colored-border parallels of Miami Marlins.

#155 - Matt Joyce, Athletics

#314 - Colorado Rockies team card

Dudes standing around after: a) their pitcher gives up 9 runs?; b) the trainer tends to the catcher who was just plunked in the junk?; c) security tackles a nitwit who ran on the field?

I need answers!

#100 - Giancarlo Stanton, Marlins

Awesome. More cards like this. This will be the last card of Stanton's that I will like for a long, long time.

Also, as Phungo pointed out, hero numbers have returned.

#260 - Rick Porcello, Red Sox

#342 - Sean Manea, Athletics

That's the end of pack one.

And that brings me to Stage 3 of opening 2018 Topps:


I don't hate the design.

I've never hated the design. Oh, sure it's weird. Why the waterslide? Why is the name and team bar disintegrating? Why the glowing swoosh light behind the team logo? Is this indicating the speed at which the logo is falling down the slide?

But when I get past that -- and the fact the slide is covering up the first part of the player's name -- I kind of like it. The design is colorful, especially when compared with the last couple of years. It doesn't take up too much space on the card. And, this may make me sound odd, but I get a sense of light and breeziness with these cards that carries over to the back. Bright colors. Sunshine. Beaches. Waterslides. Summer. Baseball. I know it's just me, but it's kinda cool.

Pack 2

 #336 - Bruce Maxwell, Athletics

As usual, pulling a bunch of Oakland A's is not helping my self-esteem in trying to identify ballplayers.

#283 - Koji Uehara, Cubs

#26 - Cesar Hernandez, Phillies

#272 - Paul Blackburn, Athletics

 #185 - Chance Sisco, Orioles

LTM-CE - Corey Seager, Dodgers, Legends in the Making insert

I am very bored by inserts. If some of them were actually about something, then I wouldn't mind them showing up in packs, but the majority made now are excuses to repeat rookies, stars and legends that we've seen over and over.

It was pointed out to me that this card has an error on the back:

 The second line of the write-up should read "Seager left the yard three times ...". If only this were 1981 Fleer and I could search for a corrected version and made a cool 25 bucks.

Home Run Challenge card

Card for a contest I won't enter. Nutshell: Log on. Pick a player. Pick a game. You might win a grand prize to go to the Home Run Derby (no thanks).

#294 - Jose Altuve, Astros, AL Batting Average Leaders

#144 - Jean Segura, Mariners

#212 - Lance McCullers, Astros, World Series subset

Ugh. These things. I forgot about these.

We're going to get nothing but World Series games showing the winners, while the Dodgers, who almost won the damn thing, get completely shut out. I suddenly hate you, 2018 Topps.

#46 - Cam Bedrosian, Angels

#132 - Marcell Ozuna, Marlins

I'd rather see a player's face on his card.

#30 - Carlos Correa, Astros

That ends Pack 2. Not the greatest pack for me.

But let's talk about the photos, since a couple other bloggers have brought it up.

The pictures do seem better this year, almost Stadium Club-light in a lot of cases. But I don't know if that's merely the wider amount of space reserved for photo presentation compared with the last few years.

It seems that Topps has been leading up to this design for three years now.

In 2016, Topps unveiled its first full bleed flagship design. But chunky graphics dominated the lower fourth and the smoke corners ate up even more territory.

So in 2017, they got rid of the smoke corners, but left some haze on the bottom, which divided the bottom portion of the card from the top portion.

So, learning from their mistakes -- DON'T MESS WITH THE PHOTO -- we arrive at 2018. I still think there's a little bit of haze under the team bar, but it doesn't bother me as much.

What does bother me is ...


2016 Topps and 2017 Topps were just PRACTICE for 2018 Topps!!!

I want all my money back from 2016 and 2017.

Pack 3

#10 - Francisco Lindor, Indians

#143 - James Paxton, Mariners

#90 - Miguel Cabrera, Tigers

#195 - Avisail Garcia, White Sox, AL Batting Average Leaders

#21 - Harrison Bader, Cardinals

LTM-MM - Manny Machado, Legends in the Making insert

HR Challenge ad card

#263 - Chase Utley, Dodgers

Fourth Dodger pulled. Nice pack selecting, Night Owl. Topps informs you on the back that Chase Utley does not participate in social media. This is not a surprise.

#73 - Miami Marlins team card

#57 - Scott Feldman, Reds

#102 - Wil Myers, Padres

#27 - Josh Tomlin, Indians

#240 - Robinson Cano, Mariners

That's a pretty card.

And that ends pack 3.

Everyone let out a big sigh.


I bought just three packs because I don't need any more new cards from sets I'm not collecting. I still haven't put away all my 2017 cards.

But after viewing them, and seeing that I like them just a little, it seems silly to have more 2016 and 2017 Topps -- two unfinished, ugly sets -- than of 2018.

It's also silly to waste money on a set that basically continues what was started in 2016, which is something I don't appreciate. But I will probably waste a little money here and there to take the edge off of life.

That's just the way I collect. I accept it. I'm resigned to it. At least I buy a lot less of it than I did five years ago.

How's that for an endorsement?

2018 Topps: It's not 2016 or 2017 Topps.


carlsonjok said…
Not many Yankees. You must feel cheated to not pull an Aaron Judge.
night owl said…
Au contraire, you missed my celebratory happy dance.
steelehere said…
I wish Topps would tell MLB and MLBPA to put their big boy pants on and allow the crowd to not be blurred in the player's photos. Every fan give MLB the right to use their likeness when they attend a game. It's printed in the fine print on the back of the tickets.

Gianocarlo Stanton's base card in Oakland looks amazing because of the background is legible. When you compare it to the card you pulled afterwards, Rick Porcello, it's even more impressive because of the blurred background on Porcello's card looks horrible.
Brian said…
I thought the Marcell Ozuna card almost looked 1973-like.
jacobmrley said…
Do you know how great a dog-that-does-handstands card would be? Maybe in Opening Day.
capewood said…
Nice post. Almost makes me want to back to long form blogging
Captain Honkass said…
This comment has been removed by the author.
Captain Honkass said…
Haven't looked for and/or bought any 2018 Topps yet, but that Slegers is my already favorite card of 2018...

(Damn typos...)
Old Cards said…
Thank you for my first look at the 2018 cards. Thanks to this great post, I won't have to waste money buying any of these cards. The cards are much too busy and like steelehere, I don't like the blurred backgrounds. Had to go back and search for the RC logo on Fried's card after your following comment mentioned it. A tribute should stand out like the all-star cards in the 75 set or maybe the rookie cup on this year's Bellinger card. The Gianocarlo Stanton card is my favorite, because of what steelehere pointed out and I like the posed card as opposed to an action shot. Your comment "I'd rather see a player's face on his card" is my exact point on any card no matter what the year!
Old Cards said…
Excellent point on "background"!
Old Cards said…
Exactly, a la the 1973 Willie Davis.
Commishbob said…
"..... You get a Derek Jeter insert card. I'm starting to miss the old days of pulling colored-border parallels of Miami Marlins." I lol'd at this.

Thanks for buying these so I don't have to. Always appreciate other guys throwing themselves on their sword.
P-town Tom said…
I made a similar comment about the blurred backgrounds in the past and then someone informed me that Topps was using the original pictures and they did not doctor the background.
I just checked on and found the exact Harrison Bader photograph... Topps did NOT blur out the crowd in the background on Bader's card. I'm going to assume it's the same across the board.
Fuji said…
This is the fourth or fifth 2018 Topps post of the day... and yours by far has the most Athletics featured. So that's something. You avoided pulling a Judge. That's something too.
Nick Vossbrink said…
That Cam Bedrosian card has me wondering how his brother Cody is doing. I remember in 1990 how Steve stepped away for a bit because Cody had leukemia and the Giants started selling Cody Bear stuffed animals to raise money for childhood leukemia programs.
GCA said…
"How's that for an endorsement? 2018 Topps: It's not 2016 or 2017 Topps. "

What the heck, that's how a lot of us elect Presidents these days...
Sooz said…
That's how the image looks. No doctoring of backgrounds going on. Here's the Porcello card on Getty:
night owl said…
You're welcome, although I'd hardly consider spending 6 dollars and change falling on my sword.

Popular posts from this blog

Cards I'll never buy

I started thinking about the topic of this post even before I saw this image today on the Twitter page of @halocline_gg.

I immediately breathed a sigh of relief upon seeing the photo. This hobby disaster had nothing to do with me.

To run into a sign like this -- if it involved baseball -- would be deflating. And that's why I was relieved that it was targeting a product -- and collectors -- that are so far removed from the way I collect.

Here are the things that I don't care about concerning 2019-2020 Optic Mega Boxes:

1. It's Panini
2. It's basketball
3. It's basketball players on Panini cards.

There are few cards that I know I will never buy, but current basketball cards are definitely in that category.

And here's the exercise: since I have a wide variety of card interests and lots of things that I would buy, I tried to think of cards I would never buy. Ever. Not on a whim. Not on a dare. Never.

I came up with a few. Let's start with the topic du jour:

1. Current b…

Where pages go to die

One thing that I fail to do when trading in this hobby is make the best use of my PWEs and my extra pages.

When sending out a PWE, I usually pack maybe 3 or 4 cards into penny sleeves and fold some paper around it so the cards don't move around and then ship it off.

Meanwhile, people are stuffing up to 12 cards into one-third of a nine-pocket page and shipping it in that same PWE. What's wrong with me?

I don't know, I guess I don't have a lot of extra pages around right now. But that's not the main reason. The main reason is I don't think of it. And when someone sends me one of those cut-up pages, I don't keep them so I can be just as efficient when I send out PWEs.

Yup, those cut-up pages just get chucked. I'm the place where pages go to die.

I've got to stop that. I have a card room and a card desk and a card drawers full of supplies. I love my card drawer full of supplies. All I need to do is add those cut-up pages to the drawers and I'll be…


I've been feeling a little guilty lately about neglecting my 1980s card needs.

All of my recent purchases have been related to vintage or Dodgers from the 1990s to the present. The poor '80s have been ignored.

I don't have anything against the '80s, not at all. It's pretty much my favorite decade. While I prefer the '70s for cards and the '90s for god awful situations, the '80s are the overall winner. I continue to live in them when it comes to music, recounting past girlfriends, and the best memories of all-time.

So why don't I gravitate toward the cards from the '80s?

Well, probably mostly because I have so many of them. All the Topps sets are complete. And most of the Dodgers team sets from that time were finished off long ago. My favorites from Donruss and Fleer are done, too.

That leaves the sets that aren't the greatest but do showcase the players that I grew up with, and that's why I'm still trying to complete some Fleer sets…