Skip to main content

Awesome night card, pt. 77


I am coming up on two blog milestones. I would really like to recognize each milestone in some fashion, either through a giveaway or a desperate attempt to be clever.

But I'll be honest. I've got nothing.

A couple days remain before the milestones hit, but let me tell you, I've been thinking about this for weeks and nothing is coming to mind. The evil month that is March has sapped all of my creativity.

So while I'm thinking about whether I should do something or just ignore the whole thing together -- after all it's just a collection of numbers -- take a look at this Mike Schmidt Topps Big night card.

I have a simple question for you: Was Topps Big the start of the retro craze?

I've heard this mentioned before, including within the last few days, but I can't place the blog. (There are so many). I'm guessing that the statement holds some truth. Topps decided to create horizontal cards that matched the size and resembled the design of its mid-1950s cards. It was an obvious homage to the golden era of card collecting.

But instead of praising the Topps Big cards, many collectors cursed them because the cards didn't fit in a standard 9-pocket sheet.

I'm wondering if I should also curse them for giving birth to the never-ending retro craze that I once loved and now am beginning to wish would finally die.

But isn't there an earlier set that paid tribute to an older set? How about 1987 Topps, which looked like 1962 Topps? How about 1986 Topps' similarities to 1971 Topps? How about 1983 Topps, which looked a lot like 1963?. Do they share in the blame for unleashing a thousand retro sets on collectors? Or maybe it's an overlooked oddball set that is the reason that I have to stare at 1961 Topps again.

I'm curious what others think.

Anyway, Schmidty Big is still a cool card. Even if I have to order special pages to get it in a binder.

Comments

Matt Runyon said…
I liked those "big" cards. They had a different design while paying homage to the cards of the past. I like these better than the heritage cards.
Jeffrey Wolfe said…
I've always contended that '89 Bowman was the first true "retro" set. Even though they made into a regular modern set the next year. The cards were made to look exactly like old cards featuring new players using a trademark bought up by a larger company. This to me was the premise all of the current retro sets are based on.
Paul Hadsall said…
I agree on the 89 Bowman set starting the retro trend. The Topps Big cards were more fun, though.

You could get 8-pocket pages that they'd fit in, but it was challenging to find them when the set first came out.

Popular posts from this blog

Stuck in traffic with Series 2

In the whirlwind that has been my life this month, I found myself going absolutely nowhere for a portion of Thursday afternoon. I was in the middle of yet another road trip, the third one this week. This one was for work, and because it was job-related, it became quickly apparent that it would be a waste of time. The only thing that could save it was a side visit to the nearby Walmart to see if I could spot some Topps Series 2. I found it right away, which was shocking as I was pretty much in the middle of the country, where SUVs share the road with tractors and buggies. Who knew that the Amish wanted Series 2, too? The problem was getting back into civilization to open the contents of the 72-card hanger box I bought. The neighboring village is undergoing a summer construction project smack in the middle of downtown. It's not much of a downtown, but the main road happens to be the main artery in the entire county. Everyone -- and by everyone I mean every tractor trailer ha

Heading upstate

  Back in 1999, Sports Illustrated published an edition at the end of the year rating the top 50 athletes of the century for every state.   As a lifelong Upstate New Yorker, I braced for a list of New York State athletes that consisted almost entirely of downstate natives, that is, folks from the greater NYC area and Long Island.   We Upstaters are used to New York City trampling all over the rest of the state. They have the most people, the loudest voices. It happens all the time. It's a phenomenon unique to this state. Heck, there are still people out there who, when you tell them you're from New York, automatically think you're from NYC. They don't think of cows and chickens when they think of New York. But trust me, there are a lot of cows and chickens in New York State. Especially cows.   So, anyway, when I counted up the baseball players that SI listed as the greatest from New York State, six of the nine were from New York City or Long Island. I was surprised all

G.O.A.T, the '80s: 30-21

  I often call this current period of the television sports calendar the black hole of sports programming. The time between the end of the Super Bowl and the beginning of televised Spring Training baseball games is an empty void when I'm looking for something to watch on traditional television. I don't watch the NBA and I find the NHL on TV holds my interest for maybe a period. College basketball I can't watch until the tournament. This didn't used to be as much of a problem back when I could turn instead to my favorite sitcoms in February. Do you remember when February was "sweeps month"? (Maybe it still is, I don't know). Networks would make sure that every top show aired original episodes that month, no reruns. So you'd always have something to view during the week even when the sports scene was boring. (I know, people have multiple streaming viewing options now. But I find myself going weeks sometimes before I see something I want to view on Netfli