Email malfunctioning is forcing me to write and publish this on my phone. Let's see how this goes.
About a week ago I completed the 1990 Swell set thanks to an envelope from Jeff at Cardboard Catastrophes. He had the last 9 cards I needed.
That's eight, I know, the 9th is the Mickey Lolich.
This set of 135 cards was pretty easy to finish, and as I mentioned in a previous post, these are much easier to land than the '89 or '91 Swell cards ... at least they're offered up a lot more often in TCDB swaps.
This is also probably the first set completion that I can attribute greatly to TCDB deals. I know before I was trading on there, I didn't think I needed TCDB's trade function. I can still manage without it, but TCDB trades seem ideal for low-hanging fruit like '90 Swell.
That's gonna be the theme of 2023 as far as set completion, finishing off those low-hangers, because all the big-boy bill-flashers are keeping the vintage sets I want to finish far out of reach with their tall, tall spendy arms.
Speaking of out-of-reach vintage, I also found some 1967 Topps needs in the envelope with the Swells. I guess these were throw-ins, since I wasn't expecting them. My kind of throw-ins!
Jeff included a note saying he landed a bunch of 1966 and 1967 Topps cheap. He was mainly interested in the '66s (this does not compute with me at all). And he sent some '67s my way!
He said the cards cost him two cents-per, so, yeah, they had issues. (Oh, thank goodness, email is back. No more typing on tiny keys! Let's go!)
Let's see the cards that are perfectly acceptable for my probably-never-to-be-completed 1967 set:
There's nothing like a card of one of the Impossible Dreamers in the year of the Impossible Dream season. Lonborg's "crime" is that he's off-center, and this is absolutely nothing in my eyes. I was pulling off-center cards in my sleep from 1975-81.
Both of these cards are already in my Dodgers collection, so I needed an extra one of each for the '67 chase. I'm fine with the condition because of that. I'm a little more lenient on card flaws with my Dodger collection, so if these cards disturb me in the '67 binder, I'll just swap them with the Dodgers versions!
My goodness, two cents for this card? With a couple of surface marks and some worn corners? This is where graders do me a favor, send me all of your hand-me-downs that look like this.
Speechless. TWO CENTS! Billy Williams actually has a crease in the lower right, but I can't imagine upgrading this card, unless a better-conditioned one falls from the sky.
These are all low-number upgrades, though I think for all of them I may have forgotten to cross off their card number after getting a better copy, each of these have the smallest of flaws in my eyes. My current Astros rookies card is miscut, the Latman has obvious wax stains and the top edge of Schaal got wet at some point. I can overlook all, but appreciate the improvements.
Now for the rest, which I can't overlook, but will operate as space-fillers:
The Tim McCarver doesn't belong here, I actually picked up the '67 McCarver at the last card show I was at. But the rest here have been significantly handled, most winding up with major creasing.
So I'll be storing these upside-down in the '67 binder until a nicer one comes along. Although this is the 1967 set, so it's very possible I'll come to the stage where prices are so astronomical and I'll be so sick of dealing with them then -- FINE -- Bengal Belters, you get in for good -- in fact, let me give you another crease to balance off the card!
But I'm not at that stage yet.
All of these are much appreciated and quite a surprise as they are not 1990 Swell cards. I've been the recipient of several extras packages over the last week or so and you'll see them all. Card collectors are the best with generosity.
Comments
Love the Billy Williams card with the batting cage in the background.
1967 and 63 are my favorite 60s sets. I have all but about 25 of that set (67). It took years to find the Brooks high number 600. I never found a Seaver in good enough shape to pay that I could afford. The Red Sox team card is like.finding the holy grail. I've never seen that at a show. Same with Colavito.
Overall, the highs in 67 are not as bad to find as 66. But you get an amazing collection of players.
[I desperately need Blogger to add an edit button]