Skip to main content

Finest is back ... and it doesn't like the Dodgers


Finest is one of those sets that I love but can never get near. It's always sitting in some card shop miles from me, both in terms of distance and price range, making nasty faces because it knows that I can't get to it.

So when there's a group break that includes Finest, I'm there. A Cardboard Problem announced a Finest break a long, long time ago -- back when everyone thought the Phillies were going to run away with the World Series -- and I jumped immediately on the Dodgers, with visions of cool, colored refractors and maybe a funky patch so I could hypnotize people who are impressed by that kind of thing.

Well, the break finally happened after Topps finished goofing around with what it was going to do with the set (oooooooh, more rookies. Thank goodness. There just aren't enough of those on cards). I chalked it up to another "worth the wait" situation. But while Marie and Sooz made the wait worth it by throwing in some extra cards, Finest did not. The 2011 Finest set is a fat disappointment for Dodger fans.

The base set is no problem. It's just 100 cards. Since it was a case break, I was guaranteed of getting multiple versions of the Dodger base cards. And I did. Plenty of Kemp (above) and ...


... Either, Gordon and Sands. There's enough to go around to all my fellow Dodger bloggers.

The design this year is just OK. It looks a lot like the cereal box/value box refractors that Topps has put out the last couple of years. I guess Topps has spoiled us with those. Plus, I have unrealistic expectations. My favorite years of Finest are 2003 and 2004 when it featured all the bright colors. I expect Finest to look like that every year.

I also have no idea if any of the base Dodgers I received are refractors. There is no notation on the back of the cards anymore. After flicking the cards around under a light for what seemed like eons, I think one of the Gordon cards is a refractor. But I don't think I'll ever know for sure.

Besides, I got distracted by the write-up on the back of the Gordon card.


Whaaaa?

Do they have a dominatrix writing copy at Topps now?

Anyway, while I was viewing A Cardboard Problem's break, watching M&S (or S&M if you want to stay with Topps' weird fetish writing) open the Finest case, I kept noticing an overriding theme.

See if you can figure it out:

Phillie, Yankee, Brave, Phillie, Brave, Yankee, Red Sox, Brave, Yankee, Phillie, Red Sox.

Hmmmmmmm.

The Dodgers -- along with a few other teams that I don't pay any attention to -- were disappointingly lacking in this product.

It's when you get to the insert sets that Finest's East Coast Bias is most noticeable. I looked at the checklists for the insert sets in Finest (Finest Freshmen, Finest Foundations, Finest Moments) and totaled the number of cards for each team. There are 50 total cards among those insert sets. Here's the breakdown:

1. Phillies - 7
2. Yankees - 6
3. Braves - 4
4. Giants - 3
5. Red Sox - 3
6. Rays - 2
7. Orioles - 2
8. Blue Jays - 2
9. Twins - 2
10. Rangers - 2
11. Angels - 2
12. Mariners - 2
13. Nationals - 2
14. Mets - 2
15. White Sox - 1
16. Royals - 1
17. Marlins - 1
18. Reds - 1
19. Cubs - 1
20. Pirates - 1
21. Cardinals  - 1
22. Astros - 1
23. Rockies - 1

Them's a lot of Phillies. Halladay and Howard, as well as Cano, Heyward and Posey, appear twice, which I'll never understand.

There are seven teams without a player among the inserts. Most of them are your usual suspects. I'm sure they have a beef, too, but the ones that are really conspicuous are the Brewers and the Dodgers.

Don't tell me it's because the Dodgers suck. They finished above .500, which is better than a lot of teams. And they have legitimate, collectible players on their team.

I know there are Dodgers in the relic and autograph insert sets in Finest, but there is almost no chance I'll see those. I also know that this is a blessing in disguise for me -- no inserts to chase! No money to blow!

But I like Finest. I think it looks pretty in the binder. I want its cards. I suppose I could just track down some colored refractors, but Finest doesn't even have a blue refractor this time out. Blue is the all-time best refractor!

Finest is no fun this year.

But the ladies cheered me up with a few extras.

Ready?


Staying with the shiny stuff. These are the last two base Dodgers that I needed from this year's Topps Chrome.


And this is the last (and only) Dodger insert from Topps Chrome, unless I want to chase the hits. This is one of those "vintage" chrome refractors modeled after the design used the first year of Topps Chrome. Not a great design, but a great card.


This is about all that's left for me with Chrome -- tracking down colored refractors. So happy I have Sands in my possession now. That will help prevent me from needlessly grabbing a few Chrome rack packs in cash-strapped times.


The two Prime 9 Dodgers from that hobby shop set. This is a cool little set, and I treasure every Koufax that I can get (you, too, Jackie).

The Koufax card, as you can see, is actually a hair smaller than the Robinson card. I don't know if they're all cut like that. It will bother me for 2 minutes and then I'll never think of it again.

The same goes with Finest's treatment of the Dodgers. When Finest comes around next year, I'll probably be jumping at the chance to get in a break, with visions of a fancy, shiny, colorful cards.

That's the thing about shiny. I can't say no.

Comments

cynicalbuddha said…
I was contemplating for a second, just a second on getting in for the Brewers, but your tally sums up why I didn't. No love for the Brew Crew either. Stoopid topps!
Captain Canuck said…
east coast bias! Pffft! The Giants are well represented! Heh....

oh, I saw a guy pull a Jerry Sands orange bordered refractor rookie auto /99 out of Finest at the old card shop last night. Nice card.
He wouldn't trade it though.
Next box, a Dee Gordon dual jersey auto.
Same deal. Sorry bud, I tried.
That's why I'm glad I missed out on the Rangers in two breaks.

Popular posts from this blog

G.O.A.T, the '80s: 30-21

  I often call this current period of the television sports calendar the black hole of sports programming. The time between the end of the Super Bowl and the beginning of televised Spring Training baseball games is an empty void when I'm looking for something to watch on traditional television. I don't watch the NBA and the NHL on TV holds my interest for maybe a period. College basketball I can't watch until the tournament. This didn't used to be as much of a problem back when I could turn instead to my favorite sitcoms in February. Do you remember when February was "sweeps month"? (Maybe it still is, I don't know). Networks would make sure that every top show aired original episodes that month, no reruns. So you'd always have something to view during the week even when the sports scene was boring. (I know, people have multiple streaming viewing options now. But I find myself going weeks sometimes before I see something I want to view on Netflix or Am

The return of COMC and a ridiculous collecting quest

  For the first time in exactly a year, I received a shipment of cards from COMC last week. I wouldn't say COMC is truly back back. I did pay extra for the express shipping so I wouldn't have to wait however long we're waiting for COMC shipments these days. But the cards arrived in short fashion and it was nice to see something in the mailbox from my preferred online card site for over a decade until last year. I had waited a year to order what was in my cart. I didn't want to be one of those people who paid and then waited nine months for shipment. I mean, what if I ordered them and COMC went under? Those were the kind of questions that were floating in my head last year.   That meant that I did lose a couple of items out of my cart, but no big deal. Nothing in there was anything highly sought-after and I merely replaced whatever I lost with a new version or something else I liked. Many of my collecting interests are not high on anyone's radar, especially 2020 fli

Say hey, you guys

  One of the most significant cards in my collecting history arrived at my door today. The 1956 Topps Willie Mays card ties my formative collecting days to my current collecting existence, confirms what I believe in in this hobby, and realizes dreams from long ago I never thought possible. It also sets a couple of personal records. It is the most I've ever spent on a single card. Yet it didn't hurt my wallet nor cause any regret. In terms of a cardboard acquisition it is about as perfect as it gets. No guilt. All power and beauty. It removes a considerable road block in my quest to complete the 1956 Topps set. It was one of the Big Three that I fretted over for years. "How would I ever obtain that card?" And now it's here. I don't have to remind you that baseball legends from the 1950s (and '60s and '70s) are departing at a rapid pace. That wasn't a top consideration in landing this card. But with Willie's age (he will be 90 in May) and the way