One game-changer to writing my own blog was that no cards seemed to be out of my reach anymore.
What had seemed unattainable before was surprisingly doable, thanks to reader generosity and simply the publicity the blog has given me.
I've reminded myself of that blog phenomenon over and over and tried to rid myself of the "oh, I'll never be able to finish that" mind-set that has been my safety net against disappointment in this hobby for decades.
But there are still impossible quests. No one will be able to convince me that they are not.
The main one is completing the 1952 Topps Dodgers team set.
Supposedly it can be done. It's not like one of the cards is a 1 of 1. But it's still impossible to me.
Every collector knows about cards 311-407 in the 1952 Topps set, the high-number series in which many of the cards were off-loaded into the ocean because all the unsold cases were taking up warehouse space. The surviving fourth-series cards, already rare because the final series was always printed in fewer quantities, are not cheap.
If I collected a team like, say, the A's or the Tigers, I might be able to land the couple of high-numbers that feature those teams in that set. But as a Dodgers fan, I can forget about owning them all. That's because the Dodgers have more high numbers in the '52 set than any other team. By kind of a lot. Here is the count:
1. Dodgers - 16
2. Giants - 12
3. Pirates - 10
4. Cubs - 9
4. Red Sox - 9
4. Reds - 9
7. Yankees - 7
8. Braves - 5
9. Cardinals - 4
9. Phillies - 4
11. Athletics - 3
11. Browns - 3
11. Indians - 3
14. Tigers - 2
15. Senators - 1
16. White Sox - 0 (lucky bastards)
I haven't even gotten a single Dodgers high-number from '52, let alone 16 of them. A couple of other teams have their own problems (i.e. Yankees/Mantle), but getting 16 near-impossible cards on a writer's salary is right up there.
Even when I land a 1952 Dodger that is not a high-number it feels like an accomplishment. The Billy Cox at the top of the post is my most recent. It's my 10th Dodger from this set and there are still a fair number of lower numbers to go (including Hodges and Snider).
When I add a '52 Dodger to my collection, I do feel like anything is possible, that's how cool those cards are. But in more rational moments, I know that it's terribly unlikely.
This is why the reprint/archives sets of the 1980s and '90s are so useful. I have all of the 1952 Topps Dodgers from the 1995 Archives Brooklyn Dodgers set and that will get me through the rest of my days as far as "having" the '52 high numbers. Here they all are, all 16:
Sure, they're not the right size, they're too slick and none of them feature the card condition that I'm accustomed to for early '50s cards.
But I get to hold them in my hands and look at them and that's the important part. If someone comes to my house and asks me "what do all of the 1952 Topps Brooklyn Dodgers cards look like?" I'll be able to show them physical copies.
That's not going to happen. But this still makes me happy. And it's the best I can do when the task is impossible.
Comments
I have a "Red Sox Low Grade" search saved in my ebay. Sometimes one will get listed with a .99 starting price so I will bid low on those and every now and then I get lucky. I do way better with old low grade Bowman, Playball, and oddballs. I would rather get three or four 1930-1950 cards than a single 52 at the same price.
...but some cards/projects are still totally "never gonna happen" material. Like owning a T206 Ty Cobb, or having a real card of each of the eight Black Sox. (But I can dream, can't I?)
I have admit I've never worried about what I would do if someone came to my house and asked what the 1952 Topps Brooklyn Dodgers cards look like, but now I can just pull up this blog post and at least show them the fronts ;)
Haven't obtained any thru the blog, but I do actually own some of the real T205s now. Down to less than ten for all of them. It's amazing how you can progress....
Did Andy Pafco not have a card in the dodgers reprint set? Back in the late 90s, pre kids, I was a regular buyer from dealer in Florida. Bought a fair amount of 50s and 60s from him. I remember getting a small lot, maybe 40, 1952s from him. None of the 311 and up though. He said that he could probably put together a near run of the pre 311 numbers for about 3 grand in vg condition, minus the Mays, pafco, and most of the hofs. I wish I had bit on that offer. I was so worried about the highs that I got scared off building something.
The 52 set isn't everyone's cup of tea but I always like this 52 and 53 topps bigger size and paintings.
High numbers or not... attempting the 52T A's team set has never crossed my mine. But I did target and purchase the Gus Zernial... because he has a unique photo. I'd grab singles if they were super cheap, but I've never stumbled across 52T singles in bargain boxes.