Skip to main content

Who is putting red on my blue team?

Topps is never going to change.

For as long as I have been collecting baseball cards, more than 40 years now, Topps has been creating alternate reality on its baseball cards.

It has placed players into uniforms of teams for which they never played. It has moved an entire ball game scene from Boston to L.A. It has erased umpires and bat boys. It has pictured living players posing with dead players. And it hasn't just been Topps doing this. Fleer and Upper Deck and probably others each have their own very well-known examples.

But this is a Topps card so I'm making it an example: what the heck are the Dodgers doing wearing red numbers on their uniform backs?

This has been pointed out by at least a couple of other bloggers already, but I can't let it go as a Dodgers devotee.

Red numbers have been a part of the Dodgers' uniform since 1952. They were created for TV. Owner Walter O'Malley liked the idea of bright numbers on the front that TV viewers could see. The story goes that the new red-number uniforms were created for when the Dodgers played in the 1951 World Series. But Bobby Thomson took care of that. So the Dodgers just debuted them at the start of the 1952 season and have worn them ever since.

But they did not ever -- at least to my knowledge -- wear red on the back!!!

Come on, who do you think these are, the Cubs??? The Dodgers are all-in with the blue theme. Dodger Blue you know. The only red you'll see anywhere is on the front tummy.

Apparently whoever was in charge of colorizing black-and-white photos from Getty Images didn't know about uniform history. It would seem logical to me that if you were altering a picture like that, you'd go to Dressed To The Nines or some other baseball history site and make sure you get the image right. Contrary to popular belief, cards are not collected by 7-year-olds anymore. This isn't going to sail over the head of a 50-year-old.

Seeing red on the uniform backs of those 1960s greats is JARRING. They DO look more like the Cubs than the Dodgers. Why the hell is Koufax celebrating with Cubs??

Anyway, let's move on. This card was sent to me by Commish Bob from The Five Tool Collector. He also sent me a Turkey Red Bellinger:

What a great card. Look at him being all correct about the Astros there. Nice red number ON THE FRONT, too.

Commish Bob's envelope was part of three tidy envelopes sent to me all in a brief flurry a few days ago.

I also received one from The Writer's Journey. Sadly, I had most of the cards already except for one.

This is a 2017 "Bowman Reproduction" of Duke Snider's 1951 Bowman card. It is all chromed up and for some reason signed by an artist on the back:

I don't really get it. Is this a painting of the original 1951 Bowman card, which was also a painting or drawing or artistic embellishment. Is this a painting of a painting? This might be too arty for my brain.

OK, let's go to one more small envelope with some somewhat less baffling cards.

Greg from The Collective Mind sent me a few Dodgers including a rare new-to-me Orel Hershiser card. I seem to be able to add new cards of my other Dodger favorites quite frequently -- Kershaw, Koufax, Nomo, even Cey. But there isn't too much new on Hershiser. This is appreciated.

(P.S.: this isn't saying there aren't plenty of Hershiser cards to acquire. I could buy all those '80s Star cards of Hershiser for the next two years).

Wooo! A 1995 Archives need. This brings my want list for this set, which is huge, down to four cards!

Finally this glorious thing. I sure am enjoying getting Dustin May cards in 2020. I could get used to this. But May's going to have to live up to his end of the bargain and not suck.

Many thanks for the cards guys!

Stuff like this is going to get me through the blizzard over the next two days.

Yes, blizzard.

Winter's been pretty upset about how easy we've had it around here.


Zippy Zappy said…
"Is this a painting of a painting?"

This got a big chuckle out of me. Take care in the blizzard.
Brett Alan said…
Dressed to the Nines actually wouldn't help--they don't show the backs of the jerseys. Still, colorizing a picture of baseball uniforms without finding out what color the uniforms are is pretty inexcusable for a baseball card company. Especially one that forces its competitors to do that wrong because it has exclusive rights to the uniform designs.
bbcardz said…
I'm glad to see that you've also now blogged about Topps getting the uniform number color wrong on the Decades Best #DB-24. That red really sticks out like a sore thumb.

Congrats on picking up some nice Dodgers cards. That black-border Dustin May is especially nice.
Matt said…
"It has moved an entire ball game scene from Boston to L.A."

I never heard of this one. Which card featured this?
night owl said…
2008 Stadium Club Manny Ramirez.
Fuji said…
Wish I had read this post a few hours earlier. I'm in the process of making a custom Richard Aoki trading card as an example for my students and I couldn't find any colored photos of him from back in the 60's. So I pulled a Topps and just went with whatever colors I wanted. If any of my students call me out on the issue, I'll just blame Topps.
friend11 said…
Are most of the photos for cards from Getty?
night owl said…
The majority for Topps flagship and Stadium Club are.

Popular posts from this blog

G.O.A.T, the '80s: 30-21

  I often call this current period of the television sports calendar the black hole of sports programming. The time between the end of the Super Bowl and the beginning of televised Spring Training baseball games is an empty void when I'm looking for something to watch on traditional television. I don't watch the NBA and the NHL on TV holds my interest for maybe a period. College basketball I can't watch until the tournament. This didn't used to be as much of a problem back when I could turn instead to my favorite sitcoms in February. Do you remember when February was "sweeps month"? (Maybe it still is, I don't know). Networks would make sure that every top show aired original episodes that month, no reruns. So you'd always have something to view during the week even when the sports scene was boring. (I know, people have multiple streaming viewing options now. But I find myself going weeks sometimes before I see something I want to view on Netflix or Am

The return of COMC and a ridiculous collecting quest

  For the first time in exactly a year, I received a shipment of cards from COMC last week. I wouldn't say COMC is truly back back. I did pay extra for the express shipping so I wouldn't have to wait however long we're waiting for COMC shipments these days. But the cards arrived in short fashion and it was nice to see something in the mailbox from my preferred online card site for over a decade until last year. I had waited a year to order what was in my cart. I didn't want to be one of those people who paid and then waited nine months for shipment. I mean, what if I ordered them and COMC went under? Those were the kind of questions that were floating in my head last year.   That meant that I did lose a couple of items out of my cart, but no big deal. Nothing in there was anything highly sought-after and I merely replaced whatever I lost with a new version or something else I liked. Many of my collecting interests are not high on anyone's radar, especially 2020 fli

Say hey, you guys

  One of the most significant cards in my collecting history arrived at my door today. The 1956 Topps Willie Mays card ties my formative collecting days to my current collecting existence, confirms what I believe in in this hobby, and realizes dreams from long ago I never thought possible. It also sets a couple of personal records. It is the most I've ever spent on a single card. Yet it didn't hurt my wallet nor cause any regret. In terms of a cardboard acquisition it is about as perfect as it gets. No guilt. All power and beauty. It removes a considerable road block in my quest to complete the 1956 Topps set. It was one of the Big Three that I fretted over for years. "How would I ever obtain that card?" And now it's here. I don't have to remind you that baseball legends from the 1950s (and '60s and '70s) are departing at a rapid pace. That wasn't a top consideration in landing this card. But with Willie's age (he will be 90 in May) and the way