Skip to main content

Awesome night cards, pt. 210


The last Awesome Night Card post was dedicated to World Series cards and how I wish that there was a card for every World Series game in each year's Topps product. Topps has adopted the scattershot method with regard to World Series cards, presenting them however the mood strikes it over many years.

I also mentioned that other card companies have picked up the slack for when Topps ignored the World Series altogether. Fleer and Upper Deck in particular.

This is one of the Upper Deck examples. I wasn't even aware of UD's tribute to the 1997 World Series until Dave K. sent a bunch of night cards a few weeks ago. Baseball cards, and baseball in general, were not on my mind much in the late '90s.

These are all from the 1998 UD set and do the World Series right. One card for every World Series game.

And the card backs do it up right, too.


That's a full boxscore of the game and a brief summary on the side.

The 1997 World Series is noted for Edgar Renteria's game-winning hit in the 11th inning to give the Marlins the title. It is one of the few World Series to end on walk-off hit and it gave the Marlins their first championship (I can imagine the whining about TV ratings if the Indians and Marlins were to meet in the Series today, heck, I'm sure they whined about it then).

It also happens to be the first World Series that I presented in the newspaper at my job. I was only a few months into leaning how to edit and Game 7 of the Series was my first big test.

As you probably saw, I showed only six cards up top even though there were seven games. That's because I'm missing Game 4 from the Series.

It took some doing to figure out which game I was missing because nowhere on the cards does it mention which game it is (this is so Upper Deck, to skip a basic detail). Fortunately the cards are numbered to correspond with the chronological order of the Series. Card #426 is Game 1 and Card #432 is Game 7.

Now, the question:

Do these cards go in the night card binder?

That's tricky. I'd like them all to go in the binder, but two of the Series cards share numbers with two other night cards already in the binder.

Those two cards are this card and this card.

There is no way I want to take those fine Fleer specimens from the binder. They're both terrific night cards. However, there is a "down the road" plan that says that I will one day attempt to complete both the 1981 and 1982 Fleer sets. And if that's the case, then I will need both of those Fleer cards for set completion and that will clear the way for the 1997 Upper Deck Series tribute.

There's always a way.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Night Card Binder candidates: 1997 World Series, Games 1-3, 5-7, 1998 Upper Deck, #426-428, #430-32
Do they make the binder?: Stay tuned.

Comments

Jeff said…
Let me know when you're ready to work on 82. I've got extras

Popular posts from this blog

Stuck in traffic with Series 2

In the whirlwind that has been my life this month, I found myself going absolutely nowhere for a portion of Thursday afternoon. I was in the middle of yet another road trip, the third one this week. This one was for work, and because it was job-related, it became quickly apparent that it would be a waste of time. The only thing that could save it was a side visit to the nearby Walmart to see if I could spot some Topps Series 2. I found it right away, which was shocking as I was pretty much in the middle of the country, where SUVs share the road with tractors and buggies. Who knew that the Amish wanted Series 2, too? The problem was getting back into civilization to open the contents of the 72-card hanger box I bought. The neighboring village is undergoing a summer construction project smack in the middle of downtown. It's not much of a downtown, but the main road happens to be the main artery in the entire county. Everyone -- and by everyone I mean every tractor trailer ha

Heading upstate

  Back in 1999, Sports Illustrated published an edition at the end of the year rating the top 50 athletes of the century for every state.   As a lifelong Upstate New Yorker, I braced for a list of New York State athletes that consisted almost entirely of downstate natives, that is, folks from the greater NYC area and Long Island.   We Upstaters are used to New York City trampling all over the rest of the state. They have the most people, the loudest voices. It happens all the time. It's a phenomenon unique to this state. Heck, there are still people out there who, when you tell them you're from New York, automatically think you're from NYC. They don't think of cows and chickens when they think of New York. But trust me, there are a lot of cows and chickens in New York State. Especially cows.   So, anyway, when I counted up the baseball players that SI listed as the greatest from New York State, six of the nine were from New York City or Long Island. I was surprised all

G.O.A.T, the '80s: 30-21

  I often call this current period of the television sports calendar the black hole of sports programming. The time between the end of the Super Bowl and the beginning of televised Spring Training baseball games is an empty void when I'm looking for something to watch on traditional television. I don't watch the NBA and I find the NHL on TV holds my interest for maybe a period. College basketball I can't watch until the tournament. This didn't used to be as much of a problem back when I could turn instead to my favorite sitcoms in February. Do you remember when February was "sweeps month"? (Maybe it still is, I don't know). Networks would make sure that every top show aired original episodes that month, no reruns. So you'd always have something to view during the week even when the sports scene was boring. (I know, people have multiple streaming viewing options now. But I find myself going weeks sometimes before I see something I want to view on Netfli