Skip to main content

Total cards vs. games played

I have been cataloging cards in my collection for as long as I have been writing this blog. It seems like I'll never get to the end but the goal is to someday reach the finish line.

Once I have totaled all of my cards, there are several posts waiting to be made. One of the ones I've always wanted to write is figuring out which player in my collection has the greatest disparity between total cards and games played.

In other words, way more cards than games played.

I have a hunch who that is.

It's Karim Garcia.

Garcia played 488 major league games in a 10-year career. However, I don't care about his career with all those other teams. I care about his career with the Dodgers. Those are the only Garcia cards in my collection, with him wearing Dodger blue.

Garcia was a big prospect for L.A. in the mid-1990s. But he ended up playing in just 29 games for the Dodgers between 1995-97. Even though he was called up to the major leagues as an 18-year-old in 1995, he managed just a single home run for the Dodgers total and hit just .150. Not even his number of plate appearances with the Dodgers -- 67 -- can equal the total number of Dodger cards of him that are in my collection.

That total is 94.

Ninety-four cards of a dude who played in just 29 games for L.A. (I know this can be expressed in the form of a handy ratio or percentage, but I've just returned from another exhausting trip to my folks and am in no mood to calculate math). That's pretty ridiculous and sums up the 1990s card world quite aptly.

Garcia would go on to make a name for himself with the Diamondbacks (as a starter in the very first Arizona lineup), the Tigers, Indians and the Yankees (possibly known more for fighting groundskeepers and pizza delivery guys than anything else).

But I will remember him as potentially the guy with the biggest disparity between the number of Dodger cards and Dodger games played.

And some pretty fancy cards for those 29 games.


Jeremya1um said…
I always thought Garcia would hit 40 HRs in a season. He never did, but I still collect him and am glad he has so many cards. I kind of thought it would be Piazza or Kershaw with the astronomical amount of cards they get every year between base cards and parallels and inserts and parallels of inserts and such.
Section 36 said…
Definitely remembered more for bullpen fights.
Nick said…
I've wondered about this kind of thing as well. I too collect Karim Garcia for some reason, and noticed that he had a lot of cards as a Dodger despite only playing in a handful of games for them. Another good one I can think of is Jack Cust (another kinda obscure dude I collect) -- I own about 30 of his Diamondbacks cards even though he appeared in just three games in Arizona.

Depending on how you look at it, the golden boy could be Josh Hamilton: I have right around 50 cards of him with the Devil Rays and he ended up playing exactly zero games for them!
Nachos Grande said…
"No mood to calculate math" :(

This is an interesting idea though. Off the top of my head, I'm not sure who the Reds' representative would be on the "overproduced" list. Mike Cameron and Ron Gant both are options, though both played before the plague of parallels in the baseball world took over which might limit the number of cards that I own of each them.
I wouldn't have a clue who that Brave would be.
Fuji said…
My brain hurts. This post inspired me to think of the Oakland Athletic with the biggest disparity. After at least five minutes of flipping through scans... I gave up. Great post though.
Jongudmund said…
This is an interesting train of thought. It's like finding MLB rookie prospect cards of someone who never made it out of AAA. I've got a few of those "prospects" who are probably now retired.
GCA said…
This is the output of the Rookie Hype Machine.
Jeremy said…
I would guess Bruce Chen
Billy Kingsley said…
I never even thought about this concept. Cool! It immediately brings to mind an NBA player, who despite having a guaranteed three year contract, played in zero games...but has at least 30 cards in my collection. I might have to steal your idea.
Matt said…
Pedro Martinez probably still does not know who Karim Garcia is...
gregory said…
For a second I thought there was a question mark at the end of that Future Franchise card, but it was just a combination of the superscript trademark symbol and Garcia's shoe. Maybe a question mark is a good idea when hyping up a rookie as a Future Franchise player, though.
PK Steinberg said…
That's a pretty interesting thing to track, games played versus number of cards issued.

Popular posts from this blog

This guy was everywhere

It's interesting how athletes from the past are remembered and whether they remain in the public conscious or not.

Hall of Fame players usually survive in baseball conversations long after they've played because they've been immortalized in Cooperstown. Then there are players who didn't reach the Hall but were still very good and somehow, some way, are still remembered.

Players like Dick Allen, Rusty Staub, Vida Blue and Mickey Rivers live on decades later as younger generations pick up on their legacies. Then there are all-stars like Bert Campaneris, who almost never get discussed anymore.

There is just one memory of Campaneris that younger fans most assuredly know. I don't even need to mention it. You know what's coming, even if Lerrin LaGrow didn't.

But there was much more to Campaneris than one momentary loss of reason.

A couple of months ago, when watching old baseball games on youtube hadn't gotten old yet, I was watching a World Series game from…

Some of you have wandered into a giveaway

Thanks to all who voted in the comments for their favorite 1970s Topps card of Bert Campaneris.

I didn't know how this little project would go, since I wasn't installing a poll and, let's face it, the whole theme of the post is how Campaneris these days doesn't get the respect he once did. (Also, I was stunned by the amount of folks who never heard about the bat-throwing moment. Where am I hanging out that I see that mentioned at least every other month?)

A surprising 31 people voted for their favorite Campy and the one with the most votes was the one I saw first, the '75 Topps Campy card above.

The voting totals:

'75 Campy - 11 votes
'70 Campy - 4
'72 Campy - 4
'73 Campy - 4
'76 Campy - 4
'74 Campy - 3
'78 Campy - 1

My thanks to the readers who indulged me with their votes, or even if they didn't vote, their comments on that post. To show my appreciation -- for reading, for commenting, for joining in my card talk even if it might …

Return of the king

(If you haven't voted for your favorite Bert Campaneris '70s card in the last post, I invite you to do so).

So you've been away for a few years and want everyone to know that you're back.

How do you do that?

Do what The Diamond King did when he returned to card blogging last month: Bombard readers with contests and giveaways! Well, you've certainly gotten MY attention, sir!

I'll start with the giveaways first. Since he returned, the Diamond King has issued multiple "Diamond King 9" giveaways, straight out of the chute and rapid fire in the last month-plus. As I've said before, I am very slow to get to these "first come, first serve" giveaways. I used to think "I spend too much time on the computer" and now I realize "I don't spend enough time on the computer at all!"

But I was able to nab two cards out of the many giveaways.

I won this key 1981 Fleer Star Sticker of The Hawk. I have since acquired several more &#…