Skip to main content

Best-of-3


I'm having more and more trouble finding words to say about current players -- not current cards, mind you -- but, definitely current players.

That's a problem when buying modern cards and then attempting to write about them. The designs and photo presentation and info on the back can take you only so far. Sooner or later you're going to have to talk about the player and ... (*sigh*) can't I talk about someone from the '80s instead?

So, if you haven't noticed, this tradition of buying packs of the latest cards is slowly disappearing on this blog. Soon, you will see new cards from me only when flagship, Heritage and Allen & Ginter show up.

But, habit is habit and I was in the red big box store yesterday running errands and I scooped up one of the 2019 Opening Day packs. The contents were awful. First cards out of the pack: Giant, Diamondback, Angel I've never heard of. There was nothing -- I mean nothing -- that I could even say about the pack.

It doesn't help that Opening Day has grown more and more irrelevant by the year. Once, I could rationalize buying some OD because the "foil letters are blue!" Then, "the border colors are different!" Then, "they have no foil!" then, "the inserts are kind of cool!"

Now?

I've got nothing to say.

However, that didn't stop me. I had to stop at the blue big box store today because I forgot to buy something I meant to buy yesterday. I walked past the card aisle and grabbed 2 Opening Day fat packs. I would make this a best-of-3 pack break! If I featured the best card for each position in the pack, surely I could find something to say!

That was the plan anyway.


Card 1 (from pack 2)

It's a Dodger so that's why it's here. But it's the same image as in flagship, so that's where I run out of words.

Rejected cards: Brandon Belt, Amed Rosario



Card 2 (from pack 2)

Jacob deGrom agreed to a contract extension today. This is what is known as a "timely pull."

Rejected cards: Ketel Marte, Brad Boxberger (two Diamondbacks, yick)



Card 3 (from pack 1)

Opening Day is known for its photoshopping tricks. I'm wondering what happened here. Carlos Santana played for the Phillies last season, after playing eight years for the Indians. Then, in December, he was traded to the Mariners and then back to the Indians. Perhaps merely a 2017 photo of Santana?

Rejected cards: Brian Anderson, Starling Marte



Card 4 (from pack 3)

I admit, Cedric Mullins did not register on my radar last year. But it's nifty seeing a player positioning to bunt on his baseball card again.

Rejected cards: Jaime Barria, Anthony Rizzo



Card 5 (from pack 1)

Rejected cards: Mitch Haniger, Hunter Renfroe



Card 6 (from pack 1)

Rejected cards: Rafael Devers, Avisail Garcia



Card 7 (from pack 1)

Rejected cards: Brandon Crawford, Matt Carpenter

The seventh spot in Opening Day's 24-card packs appear to be reserved for players on teams that should finish last every year.



Card 8 (from pack 3)

More fun with photoshop. Edwin Encarnacion came to the Mariners in the aforementioned deal involving Carlos Santana.

Rejected cards: Kyle Schwarber, Trey Mancini



Card 9 (from pack 1)

Rejected cards: Eric Hosmer, Joey Gallo

No real opinion for this slot. I picked the Martinez card because it's a better action shot.



Card 10 (from pack 2)

Rejected cards: Corey Kluber, Jeimer Candelario



Card 11 (from pack 2)

That's the only blue parallel from the three packs. It's fancy, like most of the Opening Day blues have been.

Rejected cards: Shin-Soo Choo, Jack Flaherty



Card 12 (from pack 3)

I knew nothing about the Tigers merry-go-round until pulling this card. I come from a city that is known for its carousels (and why the local Double A team is called the "Rumble Ponies").

Rejected cards: Ty Cobb, 150 years of fun; Mike Trout, 150 years of fun. (Yup I picked a merry-go-round over two all-time greats).



Card 13 (from pack 3)

I feel like Frank Thomas' bat should be replaced with a giant submarine sandwich.

Rejected cards: Rangers mascot; Tom Seaver, 150 years of fun.



Card 14 (from pack 2)

This will eventually work its way to Cards on Cards. I don't get that excited about the mascot cards, especially since half of them can't even mention the name of the mascot.

Rejected cards: Diamondbacks Opening Day; Hank Aaron, 150 years of fun



Card 15 (from pack 1)

Rejected cards: Dansby Swanson, Eugenio Suarez



Card 16 (from pack 1)

I am biased against this card since the catch happened against the Dodgers in the World Series, but the card's competition was feeble.

Rejected cards: Shane Bieber, Odubel Herrera



Card 17 (from pack 2)

Rejected cards: Alex Bregman, Scooter Gennett



Card 18 (from pack 3)

Pulling Dodgers is like pulling teeth this year.

Rejected cards: Kyle Freeland, Cionel Perez



Card 19 (from pack 3)

I've wanted to pull this card since the first pack breaks of flagship, but haven't done so yet. So good for you, Opening Day and your repeating of images!!

Rejected cards: Bryce Harper, Jeff McNeil



Card 20 (from pack 3)

Another photoshopping masterpiece. Bug-eyed Paxton is most likely in a Mariners outfit, pitching against the Oakland A's for the 34th time. I am officially rooting against him this season.

Rejected cards: Jon Lester, Yusei Kikuchi



Card 21 (from pack 3)

Rejected cards: Charlie Blackmon, Jorge Polanco



Card 22 (from pack 2)

Rejected cards: David Dahl, German Marquez (yes, I went on a run of Rockies at one point -- this does absolutely no one any good).



Card 23 (from pack 3)

Rejected cards: Justin Smoak, Gerrit Cole



Card 24 (from pack 3)

Kudos to the Blue Jays photos this year.

Rejected cards: Michael Conforto, Jameson Taillon

OK, just a couple quick observations on some "rejected" cards:


This sure is a depressing card to pull after the recent news about Seaver's health. I guess I can look at this card and remember the good old days.



The back of this card says the Rangers' mascot is a horse. That clears up a lot because I've never known what the heck it was. I'd go back and forth between thinking it was a moose or a camel and decided at one point it was a "moosmel." But horse it is. Weird-lookin' thing.



Perhaps some of Cobb's biographies were a little rough on him, but "fun"? That is nothing I'd ever use to describe him.

OK, that's all I have to say about Opening Day and the last cards I'll buy of this stuff this year.

Comments

John Bateman said…
I am disliking the 2019 design more and more now that I see it. Maybe they would look a lot better in hand but this design feels so incomplete. It is like it is not totally finished. I get that feeling looking at the Chapman card. (Still love the opening day logo on the cards, though)
Bulldog said…
Great cards and post. I like Opening Day cards. So much fun in these packs. I'm even a fan of the photoshopping - I enjoy seeing these guys in their new unis.
Nachos Grande said…
I'm firmly in the "Opening Day has no use anymore" camp today.
I'm all for replacing the Opening Day brand with the much better Bunt or even better Big League. Other than my Braves, I have no use for OD. But woe is me, Topps will keep producing all 3.
Rob said…
I feel guilty - I've yet to purchase any 2019 product. I'm digging that Mullins card though.
Jafronius said…
I also have 3 Fat Packs of Opening Day. You had a better run than I did. Half the second pack were duplicates from the first. The third pack had the same 3 inserts as one of the others. Quite disappointed.
Fuji said…
Didn't really have plans to pick up any Opening Day (except for the A's and Padres mascot inserts), but thanks to this post... I was pleasantly surprised by the great photography used on some of these cards.

P.S. I hadn't heard about Seaver until now. :(
Mark Hoyle said…
Broken record here. Just picked up team set. All done with this
night owl said…
Yes, but do you have trade bait?
Defenders50 said…
See, as a kid in 1999, Opening Day had a purpose. It was a cheaper and more easily completed set, and if you wanted to get away from the 1990s GOLD that was everywhere, you had the option of the more stately silver borders on the 1999 Opening Day cards.
Mark Hoyle said…
Plenty. Pre 80’s. New stuff is cheap enough to put together without trading
steelehere said…
Greg,
I had this add pop up on facebook the other day for a Topps t-shirt with the 1975 Topps artwork on it. I figured it was right up your alley.

https://www.homage.com/collections/topps/products/topps-baseball
acrackedbat said…
OD does nothing for me. Yeah a few different player photos but not enough. Mascots? Yes, love them but photos are reused or perhaps, taken at the same time, presenting only a slight variance to the year before. A big MEH.