Skip to main content

Awesome night card, pt. 26

Topps Heritage wasn't the only thing I found at Target on Wednesday. When I say the card aisle was restocked, it was RESTOCKED. Aside from Heritage blasters and loose packs, there were blasters of UD Spectrum, blasters of regular old UD, regular old UD packs, Topps Attax, Topps regular blasters, Topps throwback blasters, Topps cereal boxes, Topps rack packs and Topps loose packs. And all of the 2008 stuff was still there.

Honestly it was like Topps received my complaint letter, even though I actually just stashed it in a desk drawer and never sent it. ... OK, I never even wrote a complaint letter. I just bitch on this blog and hope someone important will wander over and read it.

Staring at the selection, I debated what I would get to go with my Heritage blaster. I finally decided that the vibrant, mildly nauseating colors in Spectrum might make me car sick. Not that I open packs while I'm driving. That would be CRAZY. But I picked up a blaster of Topps throwbacks instead, to see what they'd be like.

They're OK. I don't understand their purpose. I like them better than the actual '09 Topps -- the cardboard thickness and feel and all -- but you certainly don't need to collect both of them. They're way too similar. I also think the throwbacks would be more effective if Topps scrapped the foil and didn't make the fronts glossy.

So, anyway, that product analysis of Topps throwbacks is really an excuse to get to this week's night card: Brian Stokes of the Mets, one of the throwbacks out of the blaster.

Stokes is a former Tampa Bay player (is it possible to have more Rays players in 2009 products this year? I pulled triple the amount of Rays than I did almost any other team yesterday). The Mets acquired Stokes before the 2008 season. He's mostly a righty out of the bullpen, and expected to continue that role this year.

According to Topps, you want Stokes to be on the mound when Alfredo Amezaga, Jorge Posada or Michael Young is at bat. None of them have gotten a hit against Stokes, which is not great for those guys because Stokes has a career ERA of 5.64.

This could be the last throwback night card featured, because I don't plan to buy any more. But, as always, Dodgers are welcome.


Anonymous said…
So THEY are glossy. I've been contemplating buying some of the "12" blasters but decided to stay away. The fact that they're glossy turns me off. Reminds of that Topps 52 Style release for basketball a few years back. Blah. Get any Sox?

Anonymous said…
oops, emphasis on wrong word. That should read "So they ARE glossy."
night owl said…
Yup, I got Van Every, Bowden, Lowell, Delcarmen. I'll set them aside.
Anonymous said…
Great. And I seriously need to get your Dodgers out to you. Your team is going to be back in Brooklyn by the time I get this package out ...

Popular posts from this blog

G.O.A.T, the '80s: 30-21

  I often call this current period of the television sports calendar the black hole of sports programming. The time between the end of the Super Bowl and the beginning of televised Spring Training baseball games is an empty void when I'm looking for something to watch on traditional television. I don't watch the NBA and the NHL on TV holds my interest for maybe a period. College basketball I can't watch until the tournament. This didn't used to be as much of a problem back when I could turn instead to my favorite sitcoms in February. Do you remember when February was "sweeps month"? (Maybe it still is, I don't know). Networks would make sure that every top show aired original episodes that month, no reruns. So you'd always have something to view during the week even when the sports scene was boring. (I know, people have multiple streaming viewing options now. But I find myself going weeks sometimes before I see something I want to view on Netflix or Am

The return of COMC and a ridiculous collecting quest

  For the first time in exactly a year, I received a shipment of cards from COMC last week. I wouldn't say COMC is truly back back. I did pay extra for the express shipping so I wouldn't have to wait however long we're waiting for COMC shipments these days. But the cards arrived in short fashion and it was nice to see something in the mailbox from my preferred online card site for over a decade until last year. I had waited a year to order what was in my cart. I didn't want to be one of those people who paid and then waited nine months for shipment. I mean, what if I ordered them and COMC went under? Those were the kind of questions that were floating in my head last year.   That meant that I did lose a couple of items out of my cart, but no big deal. Nothing in there was anything highly sought-after and I merely replaced whatever I lost with a new version or something else I liked. Many of my collecting interests are not high on anyone's radar, especially 2020 fli

Say hey, you guys

  One of the most significant cards in my collecting history arrived at my door today. The 1956 Topps Willie Mays card ties my formative collecting days to my current collecting existence, confirms what I believe in in this hobby, and realizes dreams from long ago I never thought possible. It also sets a couple of personal records. It is the most I've ever spent on a single card. Yet it didn't hurt my wallet nor cause any regret. In terms of a cardboard acquisition it is about as perfect as it gets. No guilt. All power and beauty. It removes a considerable road block in my quest to complete the 1956 Topps set. It was one of the Big Three that I fretted over for years. "How would I ever obtain that card?" And now it's here. I don't have to remind you that baseball legends from the 1950s (and '60s and '70s) are departing at a rapid pace. That wasn't a top consideration in landing this card. But with Willie's age (he will be 90 in May) and the way