Skip to main content

The commemorative trifecta

 
As soon as the Dodgers clinched the World Series title, I knew I would need to complete the commemorative trifecta.

It's pretty natural to want to have something tangible to remember a championship moment by your sports team. Videos are great, but they just don't mean as much to me as a physical object that I possess -- I can admire it quietly or take it with me.

For me, the commemorative trifecta is something you can wear that recognizes the championship, a publication that recounts the event, and a group of baseball cards that recalls the excitement.

About a month after the Dodgers won the Series, I received a commemorative Dodgers Series cap. I still need a piece of clothing. My wife has that but I don't (what's the deal with that?). I'll get something at some point, hopefully at a marked-down price.
 
I don't have a publication yet -- I would like to get the World Series program -- but the baseball cards finally arrived yesterday!
 

Yup, I decided to purchase the Topps x Ben Baller Dodgers World Series champions online-only set!
 
Now, before you get too judgy, a few points:
 
✳ Yes, back in the old days we waited until the following season for Topps to recognize the previous year's World Series champions. I get that, and I'm willing to wait for the Heritage cards that will recognize that. However, we've been living in a time of special commemorative World Series sets for more than a decade. I remember seeing the Topps 2004 Red Sox commemorative set maybe a couple of years after it came out and I thought that was a terrific idea. Also with the weird state of the hobby, who knows how long it'll take me to obtain cards that were once commonly available on store shelves.
 
✳ I like the look of the cards. To me, this is a better alternative to throwing money at Topps Now cards recognizing the World Series. Yeah, those cards have photos of actual game moments. But the presentation of those cards doesn't do it for me. Nothing about Topps Now makes me want to collect it.
 
✳ I didn't pay the ridiculous $100-$140 this set is going for on ebay.
 
I paid $33, plus shipping, for a set that advertised, "no box, no autograph" but all of the 32 cards in the set.
 
Fine with me. Who cares about a box? And who cares about the auto? Is an auto really worth charging an extra $67? That's insane. I don't want an auto in my commemorative Dodgers World Series set anyway. It'd look out of place.
 
When the package arrived (yes, it was delayed), it actually came in the commemorative box, so I don't know what I didn't get.
 
The cards are designed by artist and jewelry dude Ben Baller, who you probably know as one of the Project 2020 artists. He's one of the better ones in my opinion, although his obsession with gold chains is a bit too ... uh ... "baller" for me.
 

That's your basic card. There is not a lot of difference from card to card. But if you like the look -- which I do (a lot) -- then that is not a problem. I love the colors, the overwhelming blue and I like the L.A. backdrop. And I can ignore the "Ben Baller did the card" bragging on every card because everything else looks so cool.
 


The cards suffer the affliction of most Topps online sets in that the backs are absolutely mailed in. So don't look at the backs.
 
 

I SAID DON'T LOOK AT THE BACKS!!
 
(Good lord, can we mention Baller a few more times?)

I know I've said in the past that I'm not paying for half a card, but when your team wins the World Series for the first time in 32 years, you're willing to overlook things. Some people might have a problem paying a dollar per card for a creation like this, and I get that, but they're also probably not Dodgers fans.
 
Just about everyone who appeared for the Dodgers in the World Series is in the set. That means no Gavin Lux card, rookie obsessives.

 
 
This gives you a good idea. Virtually every obscure reliever is in there. Even Jake McGee, who I was barely aware was still on the team when suddenly I saw him in a World Series game.
 
This set really underlines the overreliance on pitching these days. Fourteen of the cards of current players show pitchers. It should have been 15 but Victor Gonzalez is not included. This is rather glaring as Gonzalez appeared in four World Series games and was a life-saver for the Dodgers in the postseason.
 
My guess is Topps didn't have Gonzalez under contract as he was kind of a surprise showing on the Dodgers roster this year. If so, it's just one of the legal marks on this set.
 
If you noticed in the picture earlier that some of the cards in the bottom right corner didn't look like the others, then you spotted the "legends" forced into this set.
 
 
I think this set answered that question that I asked several posts ago when discussing the Super '70s set. Yes, indeedy, I believe Topps is legally required to shove legends into every set, whether it makes sense or not.
 
The Robinson card doesn't make sense at all, given that this set is obviously a tribute to L.A. and Robinson never played for the Los Angeles Dodgers. Also, I'm starting to believe that Topps' contract with Don Sutton requires that he not appear in cards with his trademark afro as we're getting another early '70s photo of him.
 
 
 
But overall I'm pretty happy with this set and it's an excellent way to remember the Dodgers' World Series title on cards. I actually wish stuff like this was around when the Dodgers won World Series titles in the 1980s.
 
But we all know Topps dropped the ball on that then.

Comments

Kershaw's photo is rather slovenly, unkempt & unflattering?, isn't it? I guess it doesn't matter since he's a Cy Young winner and now a World Series Champion. The presence of the historical figures is weird. Although I know Dodger Nation is sick, in some ways, of the 1988 heroics, why not Kirk Gibson?
Jeremya1um said…
Didn’t know this Ben Baller guy did a World Series set. It would’ve been funny to see him have to do a set if the Rays won. I bet Topps would’ve dropped the idea completely.
Glad you were able to get a nice commemorative set to celebrate the win. I probably would’ve done the same thing but stuck with the Topps set. You better get the 2021 Topps team set and any Topps/Heritage World Series highlights cards to compliment everything.
Good grab! I like this set and the look of the cards. The design does a great job of paying homage to the city of LA.
Brett Alan said…
Can't blame you at all for buying the set, especially at that price. I'd pay more for an auto...but not THAT much more! I mean, I want to say "the auto would have to be..." but I'm not sure there's a suitable way to finish that sentence.

I can't believe "Ben Baller did the card" is actually on the back. It sounds like what a 7 year old would say. Oh, my gosh, it's on the front AND the back! Yikes! Can I pretend that it's a dance craze? You know, Ben Baller did the card...and then he did the twist, and then he did the Boston monkey! And would it kill them to put, like, one line of World Series stats in there somewhere? OK, I've gotten a bit riled up here. Other than that it was a kick-ass set.
steelehere said…
I couldn’t bear to purchase that set or the $50 Topps Now nonsense they offered. From the price point to the design to the lack of actual game photos, everything about the Ben Baller set is horrible. Topps seriously dropped the ball (pun intended) this year as a $29.99 retail box set like they’ve done in years past with the Chicago Cubs and Panini did this year with the Lakers would have flown off the shelves based on the sales of other Dodgers World Series Champions merchandise.
night owl said…
Well, I don't know what the Lakers set looks like because it's Panini and basketball, but the Topps Cubs set was on the horrible 2016 design so already the Ben Baller set is better than that thing.
Fuji said…
The design and the checklist are solid. Plus you were able to grab it at a great price. Not sure if I'm headed down to LA this summer, but if I do... I'll keep an eye out for some cool WS shirts when I hit the flea markets.
Good buy. If I was a Dodgers guy, I'd have snapped these up too.
cardboardhogs said…
Ben Baller did all the things Ben Baller does when he Ben Ballers. There, i said it three times.

How do the cards feel "in-hand"? some of these topps special issue cards seem really thin. if the stock was thicker, they would be so so so much nicer.
Matt said…
Those are some nice looking cards! I wonder who did them....
night owl said…
@cardboardhogs ~

They're slick, which works well with the look of the set. They're typically thin, flagship set card stock.

Popular posts from this blog

Stuck in traffic with Series 2

In the whirlwind that has been my life this month, I found myself going absolutely nowhere for a portion of Thursday afternoon. I was in the middle of yet another road trip, the third one this week. This one was for work, and because it was job-related, it became quickly apparent that it would be a waste of time. The only thing that could save it was a side visit to the nearby Walmart to see if I could spot some Topps Series 2. I found it right away, which was shocking as I was pretty much in the middle of the country, where SUVs share the road with tractors and buggies. Who knew that the Amish wanted Series 2, too? The problem was getting back into civilization to open the contents of the 72-card hanger box I bought. The neighboring village is undergoing a summer construction project smack in the middle of downtown. It's not much of a downtown, but the main road happens to be the main artery in the entire county. Everyone -- and by everyone I mean every tractor trailer ha

Heading upstate

  Back in 1999, Sports Illustrated published an edition at the end of the year rating the top 50 athletes of the century for every state.   As a lifelong Upstate New Yorker, I braced for a list of New York State athletes that consisted almost entirely of downstate natives, that is, folks from the greater NYC area and Long Island.   We Upstaters are used to New York City trampling all over the rest of the state. They have the most people, the loudest voices. It happens all the time. It's a phenomenon unique to this state. Heck, there are still people out there who, when you tell them you're from New York, automatically think you're from NYC. They don't think of cows and chickens when they think of New York. But trust me, there are a lot of cows and chickens in New York State. Especially cows.   So, anyway, when I counted up the baseball players that SI listed as the greatest from New York State, six of the nine were from New York City or Long Island. I was surprised all

G.O.A.T, the '80s: 30-21

  I often call this current period of the television sports calendar the black hole of sports programming. The time between the end of the Super Bowl and the beginning of televised Spring Training baseball games is an empty void when I'm looking for something to watch on traditional television. I don't watch the NBA and the NHL on TV holds my interest for maybe a period. College basketball I can't watch until the tournament. This didn't used to be as much of a problem back when I could turn instead to my favorite sitcoms in February. Do you remember when February was "sweeps month"? (Maybe it still is, I don't know). Networks would make sure that every top show aired original episodes that month, no reruns. So you'd always have something to view during the week even when the sports scene was boring. (I know, people have multiple streaming viewing options now. But I find myself going weeks sometimes before I see something I want to view on Netflix or Am