Skip to main content

The best card in my collection (this is not a contest entry)

I thought this would be my entry into It's Like Having My Own Card Shop's 10th anniversary contest, but I read the category wrong.

The category asks you to write about the best card ever made, not the best card in my collection. "Ever made" is not where I planned to go with my contest post. I have no idea how to justify an opinion on the best card ever made. Same with the worst card. In fact, I'm having a little trouble finding a category that I can tackle. So maybe you'll see a contest entry from me, maybe you won't.

But I've already got this post written in my head, so that's what I will do now.

The above card is the best card in my collection at this very moment.

"Of course it is!" you say. It's Sandy Koufax's rookie card!

Yes, I know. But there's so much more to it than that.

First of all, I traded for this card in high school. It is the single greatest trade of the first half of my life if not ever. I can't even remember what I traded to get this card, nor am I entirely sure who traded me the card. But there's a chance that the person who traded it to me, unless he had another Koufax rookie in stock, regrets dealing a '55 Koufax.

That's because the cheapest Koufax rookie I can find online currently is north of $200. That would be more than I've ever spent on a single baseball card and that $200 is for a Koufax rookie in basically the same shape as the above card.

But let's discuss the fabulous shape of that Koufax rookie!

Because the corners are rounded, because it is creased seven different ways from top to bottom, because there is pen-scratch in the upper left border and a big swatch of tape covering up a significant tear on the right side, I don't have to worry about it!

There is no protection of my investment. When I take it out of it's very average top-loader -- for example to scan it for this post -- I don't handle it as if it's dynamite. I can drop it on the floor three times in a row. There isn't a care in the world when it's out in the open. What am I going to do to it? Add an eighth crease?

What a relief that is for a card so formidable!

Also, the card is basically intact (thanks, tape!). The cheapest Koufax rookies you can find online have some portion of the card missing.

Finally, and this is very important in my current collecting stage, I do not need to pursue a Sandy Koufax rookie!

My collecting goals at this point are mostly related to vintage: sets and Dodgers. I would like to have all the 1950s Dodgers as unrealistic as that sounds. But money is tight and I don't see it loosening for quite a while. That doesn't match up with my goals of getting vintage '50s Dodgers at all.

The price of Koufax cards has been growing for the last decade or more. He is considered more of an icon than he was 25 years ago or when I traded for the card in high school. Many more people want Koufax cards than they did in 1982. Many more people want rookie cards than they did in 1982. And who knows what people are doing to Koufax rookies these days -- trimming, counterfeiting, grading. But I don't have to deal with any of that! Because one of the most crucial cards in Dodgerville, a card at the crux of my collection, has been in my collection for decades!

And that is why this card, in this condition, is the best card in my collection.

It's the result of probably the best decision I ever made in high school.


Hmm, 1982, A Ripken rookie perhaps? I think that Koufax looks just fine.
night owl said…
No, it wasn't that. I didn't have a Ripken rookie at that point, and nobody would have wanted a Ripken card that badly at that time to deal it for Koufax rookie. I'm sure I traded something vintage in nature.
Old Cards said…
Great card! I like cards in this condition. Who cares about investment. We are collectors! Good luck on your pursuit of the 1950's Dodgers.
Fuji said…
Sweet card! The Koufax rookie card has never even popped up on my radar. Way outta my league. I'm even struggling to find an affordable copy of his 56T card. Keeping my fingers crossed though.
Two of my favorite cards in my collection are a '58 Mantle All-Star and a '66 Koufax. I bought the Mantle from a card shop's junk box when I was in high school, and the Koufax came from a card show in the late '80s or early '90s.

These were no investments either. The Mantle has a one-inch tear, and the Koufax has a horizontal crease where someone once folded it literally in half. I think I paid a dollar for each card.

But I have a Mantle from the nineteen FIFTIES and a Koufax from the pinnacle (and twilight) of his career.

Like Old Cards says above, who cares about investment?

These cards were well loved by someone long before they found a home in my collection. If only cards could talk, these two could probably tell some great stories.
Jonathan said…
Absolutely! My 58 Ted Williams looks like it went through a washing machine but its mine and I can touch it.
Oh, you want to talk about a beat card? Check out my 1965 Deron Johnson. I got this (and Stan Williams) during 1967 when I first started collecting cards.

Where did these 2 come from? I dunno, they just showed up one day among all my 1967 cards. You know how when you pull a handful of coins out of your pocket (or a jar) and sometimes there's a washer or a button among all the coins? Yeah, THAT!
Unknown said…
old cards is correct, we are collectors. i also dont mind cards in this condition, and i have accumulated quite a collection. it is what gives me joy.

Popular posts from this blog

A friend indeed

This week has been the kind of week that only late January could produce.

Nothing particularly wrong or terrible happened. Mostly what I felt this week was a sense of spinning my wheels, of working hard without result (or with other people screwing it up), of trying to get things accomplished (while battling a sinus infection) only to have a car noise or a phone call knock me back to square one.

That feeling transferred over to the blog where I probably spent too much time uploading too many photos and conducting too much research and expecting too much in return.

But all of this is a phase. It's the January malaise. I'll snap out of it. It could be worse. I could be dealing with three feet of snow right now instead of the melting three inches that is out there.

And I could be struggling through this week without an envelope in the mail from "A Friend".

That's right, "A Friend".

That's how the return address appeared on the envelope. Just above th…

Degrees of doneness

I just wrapped up my first notable card purchase of 2020.

It was an online order -- from three of every collector's favorite card-buying sites -- and with the exception of three inserts from 2019 and a stray card from 1989, every single card I ordered was made prior to 1980.

That feels good. That feels tremendously good.

I'm starting off 2020 in the right frame of mind.

It's also a good way to put a cork in the 2019 collecting season. There are various ways you can say you're done with the cards from the previous year, call it degrees of doneness, if you will (I order steaks "medium" or "medium well," I don't need anything crawling off my plate).

1. You can be done with collecting sets from 2019. I'm certainly done with that. I didn't try to collect many sets from that year anyway. The 2019 Topps Holiday set and a third of the 2019 Topps Archives set are finished and that's everything I plan to do.

2. You can be done with buying pac…

The lone Ranger

Who is Nick Solak?

Glad you asked.

And thanks to cynicalbuddha for scanning his card into Trading Card Database.

Nick Solak is a former Yankees, former Rays prospect who appeared in 33 games for the Texas Rangers last year.

That, apparently, qualifies him for being the only Texas Ranger to appear in the 350-card base set for 2020 Topps Series 1, a checklist of which was released this morning.

That's right, the ONLY Texas Ranger.

I did the count and the Rangers, with Solak shouldering the entire load, come up a distant 30th behind the 29th-place Orioles, who have a more typical seven cards.

Here is the breakdown by team that I compiled earlier:

Dodgers - 17
Astros - 17
Nationals - 16
Cubs - 15
Athletics - 14
Brewers - 14
Indians - 14
White Sox - 14
Phillies - 13
Angels - 12
Blue Jays - 12
Braves - 12
Padres - 12
Red Sox - 12
Reds - 12
Twins - 12
Yankees - 12
Cardinals - 11
Giants - 11
Marlins - 11
Mets - 11
Diamondbacks - 10
Mariners - 10
Rays - 10
Tigers - 10
Royals - 9
Pirates -…