Skip to main content

C.A.: 2026 Topps Shoeless Joe Jackson, 1991-themed insert

 (Woof, blog views have taken another downturn, basically in the last two weeks. Maybe everyone was too busy watching the Olympics! Anyway, for those still reading, this is called Cardboard Appreciation and we're at the 365th in a series):
 

As far as I can tell, this is the first time Shoeless Joe Jackson has appeared on a Topps card.
 
I pulled it when I went back for a hanger box of 2026 Topps last week. I opened it at work. When I saw the card I didn't think anything of it other than "that's a weird-looking thing."
 
But later I remembered how MLB removed Shoeless Joe and other deceased ballplayers from its permanently ineligible list last spring, making them available to be voted into the Hall of Fame. Also, since Topps doesn't make a move without MLB approval, that means Jackson (and I assume Pete Rose) are eligible to appear in current baseball cards.
 
Up until now my Shoeless Joe cards have been created by Upper Deck, Donruss/Playoff/Panini/Leaf, various TCMA products, Conlon, Pacific Legends and some reprint issues. I collect him casually since he shares my birthday. But I never noticed that Topps hadn't featured a card of his until now*.
 
I understand the recent reasons but why nothing during the retro craze of the early 2000s or in those 1980s Topps-food product collaborations? My guess is some other company always had the Jackson estate license and Topps never thought he was interesting enough to include in a set, or more likely, he was too controversial to include in a set.
 
No matter what you think of him and whether he belongs in the Hall or not (I'm certainly not getting into that), Jackson should definitely be appearing in baseball cards as one of the on-field greats of the game. If there were two movies made about him, he should have his share of cards.
  

The back. Full career stats! I don't think that's happened too often on his cards. Topps is still being the MLB yes man about the Cleveland portion of his career, even though they were called the Indians for only 1915. Before that they were the Naps.
 
That was the most interesting card from the hanger box, though I also pulled the numbered green-bordered Shota Imanaga card that I showed a couple posts ago from that box, too.
 

I also fared better with Dodgers pulls with two Mookie Betts inserts. Sure, the 2026 inserts are lame, but it's better than pulling inserts of Fernando Tatis Jr., which I have done many more times than the zero times I want that to happen!
 
 

Also pulled this Clayton Kershaw career-closer diamante parallel.
 
Have plenty of work to do for the Dodgers team set. I haven't gotten to looking for team sets online, heck I just ordered an A&G team set and that set's been out for like 3 months. So it's still appreciated when people send me base Dodgers as The Writer's Journey did recently.
 
 

He sent me Mookie Betts' marvelous card, this is his best base card since he became a Dodger.
 
 
 
J.T. also hit the bull's-eye with this Clayton Kershaw card. I was puzzled when I first saw it, thinking it was a fairly recent issue. But then turning to the back I saw it was released in 2014 -- it was an Archives insert that somehow passed me by!
 
I used to be a lot better 12 years ago with tracking down Dodgers inserts, must've been the point when I started slacking off.
 
I haven't purchased any 2026 since but I'll probably pick up something small this week just because the shine hasn't worn off yet. Flagship doesn't have long though. I see the release date for 2026 Heritage is March 18. 

* - Shoeless Joe apparently was in the Topps Living set in 2025, so if you count online exclusives then Topps had made a card before this one.

Comments

I was happy to see Topps made a Shoeless Joe card, I just wish they would have used a sharper photo. Might have even looked better in black and white. Regardless it's one on my short list of wants.
Grant said…
Bowman released an SP 1st of ShoeJoe in 2025. I wonder if they'll do anything for the other Black Sox?
If they hadn't colorized the card, I'd find it interesting. But colorizing is complete bastardization. That Kershaw insert is sweet. And I really need to find a diamante some day. I saw my first "Holo Foil" the other day in the pack I opened. Unimpressed.
Old Cards said…
Didn't know there were no Topps cards of Jackson. Hope you're right about Rose being eligible for the HOF. Omission of the Indians name on the card back is utterly ridiculous!!!!!!
John Bateman said…
Look at those full stats that someone old can actually read. I read alot about Jackson in the 1980s but I dont remember why he was traded in Late August 1915.

How the heck did he play 45 games after August 21.
Benson said…
Long time reader, first time poster.

1994 saw a Topps set of a Damn Yankees revival that featured a card of the song "Shoeless Joe from Hannibal, Mo." ; )

To the 45 games, he was traded in the morning to Chicago (after all speculation had him going to Wahington), played a double header on the 21st a n d the 22nd with seven more double headers by season's end!

Topps also shorted him 7 RBIs in '17 but also make no mention of his 75 Ks from '08-'12. Weird.
Fuji said…
Cool card. I remember seeing Shoeless Joe cards from Upper Deck, Donruss, and Action Packed, but never put the pieces together to realize Topps didn't produce one until now. Also had no idea that he played for the A's.

P.S. Kudos to Topps for showing off his full career stats on the back.
GCA said…
If they want to be so ultraoverly sensitive about the team names, why not just make all the listings the city? Mixing mascots and locations makes it even more evident that you're politicizing baseball stats.
Kin said…
Maybe I chased people away since I've kind of come out of retirement the last couple weeks. My apologies.
BaseSetCalling said…
I can read the backs of those 91s. Yay!
madding said…
Mookie's base card is the best photo in 2026 Series 1 and that's the last positive thing I'll say about the Dodgers until next year.
Nick Vossbrink said…
Kind of a shame that there are no obvious pre-Jackie Dodgers for Topps to put in sets like this since I'd love to see if they forget about calling the team the Robins.
Jafronius said…
Same here, I just assumed Topps made one a long time ago.