Skip to main content

Maybe completing junk wax sets is the way to go

 
It's growing more and more difficult for set collectors in this hobby. Let's review:
 
1. Flagship. You must contend with inserts and parallels filling spots that were once the domain of "base cards," i.e., the cards that complete the set.
 
2. Heritage (and other spin-off brands). You'll come across inserts and parallels here, too, but also short-printed base cards.
 
3. Vintage. The demand grew once more people entered the hobby six years ago and the increased cost is fueled by the gem-mint crowd.
 
When it comes to sets I desire, it seems like no set is immune to the changes of the last 20, 30 years.
 
No set, that is, except for sets from one particular era: 1986-93. The overproduction era. Junk wax. Nothing about modern day collecting has affected these sets (stuff like collecting copyright and asterisk variations on the back has grown over time but that's easily ignored if you're not into it).
 
I was reminded of this again when I wrote about my intent to complete 1989 Score. That was less than three weeks ago, when I received a box of cards from the set from Marc that took me from owning 215 cards from the set forever to needing around 130 to finish it.
 
And that touched off a series of sends to my residence. My TCDB trade offers lit up immediately. One offer, no there are two, no, that's three! Mark Z. sent a whole bunch that is the stack at the start of this post. Bo of Baseball Cards Come to Life! had some 1989 Score for me, too.
 
Suddenly there were small stacks of 1989 Score scattered in the card room. I had to get a binder. Before I knew it, I was paging the set. I found a binder that could house both my complete 1988 Score set and the 1989 Score set.
 

I probably need a slightly larger binder, but it's late '80s Score, I'm not all that protective.
 
 

I like that I can represent both sets in the binder spine (the sticker on the spine did not come off well so there's a lot of residue I'm not sure how to remove).
 
I just finished adding the cards that Bo sent. The next part of the project is adding the Dodgers from my box of team dupes -- no concerns at all that I will be missing any.
 
So after that tornado of '89 Score passed through, here is what is left to gather:
 
220 - Tim Wallach
350 - Roger Clemens
412 - Wes Gardner
581 - Dave Stapleton
597 - Terry Francona
598 - Paul Zuvella
621 - Ted Simmons
 
I still need to check my general dupes shoebox where I might find the Francona and Zuvella -- I was sure I had both of those checked off. So if anyone has an overwhelming desire to get the above seven cards out of the house, go at it. Otherwise I can add them to my growing sportlots order, which is filled with the most inconsequential cards this time around.
 
Except ...
 
No card that completes a set is inconsequential. Not even one from a junk wax set. And if you're wondering why I didn't just go online and buy a $12 complete set -- It's a lot more fun seeing '89 Score swirl chaotically into my home.
 
Sure, I sometimes wish I was a child during the late '80s/early '90s so these sets would have more meaning to me than they do -- but hand-collated sets are about the last thing this set-collector has to connect me to the way I collected as a kid. Thank goodness the junk wax era still can do that for me (P.S.: 1990 Donruss, 1991 Fleer, don't get your hopes up). 

Comments

I wish I had some cards from this Score set to send you but I do not think I do. I prefer hand building and collating sets too, but my problem is that I have almost nothing to trade with people for, so it makes more sense to just buy the darn thing outright. How do you select your spine card (Orosco and Gruber in this instance?) Are they dupes or are their spots missing in the pages?
Doc Samson said…
Okay, this is bizarre. I just found a 89 Score factory set the other day buried in a closet. I do remember buying when it was initially released. The factory box was in rough shape, but the cards themselves are basically mint.

Leafing through the set, I have a new admiration for 89 Score. To me, it’s one of those sets that does a lot of things right. And the backs, oh boy, outstanding. Perhaps it’s time to house it in a binder.


Bo said…
I noticed when pulling cards for you that the players on the last five cards are all deceased. There's one manager but four other guys who died fairly young.
John Bateman said…
That is interesting, I just received the 1992 and 1993 Score sets - 1700 baseball cards for $42 shipped. Looking at these I was surprised how well they looked (despite the dark photos) I previously owned the 1992 set, looking at them today - The cards just look FUN. Probably the best way to describe them. The 1993 set was one I never owned but I think it might have been the best simple set from 1993. I simpler time.
Don said…
I keep finding myself drawn to that period also. The current sets have many problems that keep me from wanting to hand collate the set. But if I come across some studio or triple play, those names are familiar to me.
Old Cards said…
Number 3 makes me sad. Up until 2020 I was enjoying filling in my 60s sets! Sounds like you have come up with a good alternative plan. A few months ago, I gave away 2 big boxes of cards from the overproduction era. I guess the sets are not that bad. They just don't come with the memories!
Chris Johnson said…
I have all of them but 2 that you need. I can send them out by Friday.
Jason T. Carter said…
Pick up some "Goo Gone" next time you go to Walmart or Target. Dab a tiny bit on a paper towel and rub the spine... that adhesive residue will come right off.

JT, The Writer's Journey
oh, no love for that wonderful 1990 Donruss. Come on, and get all of the variations too :)
Big Tone said…
I bought this set years ago, mainly for the Sheffield. Guess which card in the set came damaged.