Skip to main content

Little self-control

 

The newest Beckett Vintage Collector magazine with my article in it arrived in my mailbox Monday.

This is article No. 11 for BVC and 13th overall for Beckett and I'm already formulating some story topics for future issues. Hope to get those to the editor next week.

This article is kind of a fun one, even though I dealt with a rare case of writer's block during the process. It covers the wide variety of cards -- "oddballs" to you and me -- that must be cut from a package, or sheet, or what have you, in order for it to become, you know, an actual card.

The problem is that in many cases (not all), the moment the card is trimmed away, it decreases in value.

That's what the article is about. Do you cut the thing to pieces or keep it pristine?

I decided to find as many examples of these kinds of cards that I could and the Beckett art department really went the extra mile finding images. I try to send in images of what I'm writing about, but there is no way I had all these. Here is one of the pages, as an example:


The April-May issue (Babe Ruth on the cover) should start appearing in Barnes & Noble and other magazine racks by the end of the month.

Meanwhile, I tried to come up with some topic related to this article for a blog post. I probably should have shown the Hostess cards that Bob sent me with this post instead of yesterday. Oh well.

Instead, what I have are the only items in my collection in which I have not cut the item down to card size. I admit, I use scissors freely. I have almost zero self-control in this area. The few items that I've left intact are things sent to me by other collectors in almost every case. Chances are if I bought it myself, I'd have that thing down-sized in no time.


I've shown this a few times and it's in the magazine article. The only reason this Hostess box has not been ravaged for the cards is: a) it was generously sent to me; b) I have the Ron Cey in card form already. Here's hoping Waits and Bumbry aren't the last two cards I need to complete the 1977 Hostess set.
 


I own 1990 Target cards separated into individual cards and as 3x5 sheets. One of the reasons I've kept the sheets untouched is because the odd shape of the individual cards creates storing issues. I still have the individual cards in this set stacked up on a shelf in my card desk, waiting for the day the light bulb over my head flicks on.



No cutting required with this 1977 Burger Chef tray. All you need to do is punch out the individual cards! But I've resisted. This is too fun as it is.



This arrived from Baseball Dad long ago (remember him?). He's an Indians fan and I've kept this intact ever since.


I'm sure you've seen these cards in the wild as separate entities. I just showed one not too long ago. But the 1987 Indians team has remained teammates on cardboard for as long as I've owned this. Probably the odd shape of the cards has kept me from cutting them up.
 


The only full baseball card sheets I own are minor league sets issued in 2009/2010, including team sets from the Albuquerque Isotopes for each year.

Sheets like this are very cool and not easy to separate anyway.

The trouble with these sheets and really almost all kinds of cards that come like this, whether on boxes or panels or whatever, is how the hell do you store them?


Just about the only examples of cards like these that I have purchased myself that I have not broken down into individual cards are the 1970s Hostess panels that I've bought. I've been able to use three-pocket pages to store them very nicely in a binder.

But for the other stuff?

The 1990 Target pages sit on a shelf with various other unrelated things, such as baseball figurines and old price guides. The 1987 Indians fold-out sits in a drawer where I keep extra nine-pocket pages and non-standard size top-loaders.

The Hostess box and the Burger Chef tray reside in a binder of oddball issues, too big for a page really. And the Albuquerque sheets are stashed behind a book case -- truly out of sight, out of mind. I kind of wondered whether I still had them.

This is why I am almost always cutting these things down to card size.

That and I have almost no self-control.

Comments

bryan was here said…
Snip snip.


Yeah, I cut/separate cards, too.

Easier for me to keep in the 9-pocket pages.
Jimetal7212 said…
Having flashbacks to 1984 I am. I was 10 at the time. My mom would get these 132 cards sheets of 84T from the toy store. I'd sit in front of our cabinet TV and cut the sheets up while watching the Red Sox game. Ah, innocent times...
I typically cut away, but not always. If I can, I try to get the cards both ways....intact and separated.
Nick Vossbrink said…
Love this post. I cut things down until they fit in a page. Box bottoms stay in 5x7 panels and 2-pockets. Would totally keep Hostess in 3-pockets (if I had any panels). If I can't find a way to store and look through it I kind of don't want it.

That said, if I had a set like the Target dodgers I'd probably purchase a couple 9"x12" itoya portfolios for them. And aybe ge a larger Itoya for other oversize stuff like the Burger chef tray (which rules).
GCA said…
I can't cut a straight line with scissors unless it's printed on the material.
I've had better luck with the little sliding blade paper cutter, or a loose razor blade against a straightedge.

But I usually won't cut something apart unless part of it is unusable. I have several large items for my player collections that lay flat on the top of the cabinet that stores their binders. Some get buried under the other oddball stuff up there - figures, bobbles, cups, pins, etc. I have the Crown Orioles sets stuck at the edge of a shelf where their out of the way behind the boxes of 80's update and small box sets.
BillK21093 said…
After over forty years of storing the 1987 Kraft cards in the original boxes I just last week cut them up into individual cards.

They were full boxes and just sat in a computer paper box for over 40 years. Now they are in display in nice 9 pocket sheets.
Congratulations on yet another great (I'm assuming) article in BVC - can't wait to grab a copy when it comes out.

No way you want to cut that Burger Chef panel - I think that "Burgerini's Rabbit" is a SSP.
AdamE said…
For Red Sox I cut things down to size so I can store it. For Virdon though I go the other way. I try to get one intact version and one trimmed version. That's possible for things like Hires Root Beer, Tag Ons, Topps Mail Order, and Team Checklists but for others I know I will never own both versions. I mean I've never seen a single uncut Hunters Wieners card of anyone so the odds of my finding an uncut Virdon are slim to none.
Nick said…
Storage is a big reason I tend to cut stuff like this up as well. I just don't have a good way of displaying uncut sheets, panels, etc. - and I get way more enjoyment out of them as individual cards.
Mark Hoyle said…
Love the post. Will be out looking for the mag. In some cases like this I’ll buy 2 when to keep in cut o e to cut. Example have uncut Transogram boxes and singles of the cards
Jafronius said…
Congrats on the new article!
Anonymous said…
Very cool to see some of these in their original(intact) form, especially the Hostess cards since I've seen those singles so many times. The only uncut/perforated sheets of cards I've had are a set of Dunkin Donuts Red Sox from 1992 (had the sheets for years then detached them to save room) and some 9-card sheets of McDonald's football cards, which were an offshoot of the 1993 GameDay oversized set. I've kept those intact because they fit neatly in an 8 x 10 sleeve.
Two Packs A Day said…
If it's 8.5 x 11 or smaller, i guess you could put them in sheet protector, but it might be disastrous in the long run as none of them might be archival safe unless there are special ones.