Skip to main content

My first Topps Now card


We're three weeks away from the end of the year and probably the biggest card news of all of 2016 has at long last ... finally ... arrived here at the night owl nest.

Perhaps you've heard: I don't follow the trends.

This card is my first Topps Now card. The first on-demand card set made its debut on April 3 and collectors everywhere plunked down $9.99 for a single card ... repeatedly. Others searched out deals to acquire the outrageously priced items much more cheaply.

Me?

I quietly pined for some of the Dodgers early on, then decided they were best ignored. At one point I spied a Topps Now card or two for $5, or some other price I could live with, and placed it in one of my online carts. There, it was either snatched out from under me or I found something else much more enjoyable and cheaper. And, so, the second week into December, I still didn't know what a Topps Now card felt like or truly looked like.

Now, however, I have one.

And my thoughts are ...

...

Well, that's done! What else we got?

Heh, OK, I'll elaborate a little.

I received the card from Daniel at It's Like Like Having My Own Card Shop. Since it arrived as part of a trade, it was free. Not $9.99, not $5.99, not 99 cents (I think if we were putting a real price on this card in terms of quality, something under a dollar is more appropriate). I am willing to wait as long as it takes to get a $9.99 card for free if I'm not all that fascinated with the product.

Granted, Topps Now is a very interesting premise. It's smart and about-time in a few ways. But the price put a damper on everything for me, so I ended up not caring.

However, I am thrilled to have one of the Dodger cards, and most likely I will pursue some more whenever things get down to my way of thinking. The card I received was the 102nd card issued and the ninth Dodger (keep in mind, this was only May 27th!). It has one of the larger print-runs, I believe, at 2,992 cards, because everyone has to have their rookie mojo.


This card is actually Topps capitalizing on collectors trying to capitalize. Some still see dollar signs in their eyes when a 19-year-old takes the mound. But as you can read on the back, Urias' performance wasn't worthy of a card. He pitched 2 2/3 innings and gave up three runs in the first inning. That's a 12.27 ERA, son. They used to send you back to the minors for that, not make you a card on the spot.

Urias received at least one other Topps Now card, I'm not sure if he had any more. I've pretty much lost track of the Dodger totals.

As for the card quality, I won't go overboard: it's your basic modern-day card stock, perhaps ever-so-slightly thicker than a flagship card, and a little more glossy. The design is basic and pleasant, a good choice. Can you imagine 2016 flagship's design coming at you 3 or 4 times a day?

Daniel sent me a handful of other Dodgers in nice Christmas wrapping. Let's see some of them:


Lots of serial-numbered stuff there.

My guess is Topps Now was a rousing success and that we'll see it again next year. I doubt it will be received with the same enthusiasm. Topps definitely should tweak it a bit, and if I ever hope to get involved, the tweak will have to include the price.

I'm happy I was able to land a Topps Now card within the year that it was made. But, honestly, I'm having a much more enjoyable time collecting all the Topps Then products.

Comments

Tony Burbs said…
Agreed - the concept is welcome and long overdue. However, the price point just too preventative, which is a darn shame.

Also, random, but I truly love that the "O" in "NOW" is a clock - it's the little things.
Anonymous said…
Silly me, I thought that Topps Now would end after the World Series was over and awards had been handed out... but now they're doing cards for major trades. When will this madness end?
Cardhobbyist said…
I just jumped back into the hobby and I didn't even know this was a thing.
Stealing Home said…
"They used to send you back to the minors for that, not make you a card on the spot."
Ha! Priceless.
Daniel Wilson said…
I couldn't bring myself to pay full price for any Topps Now cards, so when I came across this one for $1 I had to pick it up to check it out. Hopefully, sometime soon I'll find a D-Backs Topps Now card.
P-town Tom said…
I think if Topps wants to keep the interest in the Topps Now brand they'll have to come down on the price, otherwise only those with a profit in mind will be purchasing these.
Fuji said…
Personally... I'm okay with Topps Now for one reason. It's fun collecting cards created for players/games you actually attended and witnessed.
Mike Matson said…
I've pretty much ignored Topps Now because of the Price Point.. $9.99 isn't horrid.. The shipping is where they take the spiked club and do unspeakable things to you.
I looked at one and it would have cost $40-60 USD to ship to Canada.. So... $60-80 CDN for one card? Nope.. Unless it's an old card, not worth it..
defgav said…
I'm hoping they're serial-numbered next year, even if that tacks a few days onto the process.

Popular posts from this blog

This guy was everywhere

It's interesting how athletes from the past are remembered and whether they remain in the public conscious or not.

Hall of Fame players usually survive in baseball conversations long after they've played because they've been immortalized in Cooperstown. Then there are players who didn't reach the Hall but were still very good and somehow, some way, are still remembered.

Players like Dick Allen, Rusty Staub, Vida Blue and Mickey Rivers live on decades later as younger generations pick up on their legacies. Then there are all-stars like Bert Campaneris, who almost never get discussed anymore.

There is just one memory of Campaneris that younger fans most assuredly know. I don't even need to mention it. You know what's coming, even if Lerrin LaGrow didn't.

But there was much more to Campaneris than one momentary loss of reason.

A couple of months ago, when watching old baseball games on youtube hadn't gotten old yet, I was watching a World Series game from…

Some of you have wandered into a giveaway

Thanks to all who voted in the comments for their favorite 1970s Topps card of Bert Campaneris.

I didn't know how this little project would go, since I wasn't installing a poll and, let's face it, the whole theme of the post is how Campaneris these days doesn't get the respect he once did. (Also, I was stunned by the amount of folks who never heard about the bat-throwing moment. Where am I hanging out that I see that mentioned at least every other month?)

A surprising 31 people voted for their favorite Campy and the one with the most votes was the one I saw first, the '75 Topps Campy card above.

The voting totals:

'75 Campy - 11 votes
'70 Campy - 4
'72 Campy - 4
'73 Campy - 4
'76 Campy - 4
'74 Campy - 3
'78 Campy - 1

My thanks to the readers who indulged me with their votes, or even if they didn't vote, their comments on that post. To show my appreciation -- for reading, for commenting, for joining in my card talk even if it might …

Return of the king

(If you haven't voted for your favorite Bert Campaneris '70s card in the last post, I invite you to do so).

So you've been away for a few years and want everyone to know that you're back.

How do you do that?

Do what The Diamond King did when he returned to card blogging last month: Bombard readers with contests and giveaways! Well, you've certainly gotten MY attention, sir!

I'll start with the giveaways first. Since he returned, the Diamond King has issued multiple "Diamond King 9" giveaways, straight out of the chute and rapid fire in the last month-plus. As I've said before, I am very slow to get to these "first come, first serve" giveaways. I used to think "I spend too much time on the computer" and now I realize "I don't spend enough time on the computer at all!"

But I was able to nab two cards out of the many giveaways.


I won this key 1981 Fleer Star Sticker of The Hawk. I have since acquired several more &#…