Skip to main content

Work

 
It's another Labor Day spent at work for me. I tried to think of the last time I had Labor Day off and I eventually gave up. I know I was off in 2002, but since then, no idea. It's safe to say that I have worked way more times on this day than I have not.

That's the nature of this job and our school system in this part of the country. School starts immediately after Labor Day, which means school sports start then, too. In fact, Labor Day used to be the unofficial start of school sports. They've since pushed into August, a full week or so before classes begin. Still, no matter when they start, I'm not getting a third day off this week. It'll come later on this month.

I am writing this post at work right now. I had hoped it would be an easy night with the new set-up that I had mentioned in my blog post last week. But, of course, it's work, so there's a snafu immediately that makes tonight just another grind. So I'm writing this post quickly.

 

I often think about Andy Messersmith on Labor Day. He was a favorite pitcher of mine during my fledgling days as a baseball and Dodger fan. I completely missed his 20-win season for the Dodgers in 1974, the All-Star Game start and the starts in the World Series.

The first time I was aware of the man was when I came across his 1976 Topps card in '76. I just loved the card. But by the time I pulled it (or traded for it, I don't remember how I came to have it), he was not a Dodger anymore. He had signed with the Braves as one of the first baseball free agents.

 

I had read about the court case, the ruling, my first time learning of the word "arbitrator" and lots of other complicated words. I was new to the newspaper and the sports section and had almost no idea what I was reading. It didn't make sense (I was 10 at the time). I just knew I was sad that Messersmith wasn't going to be a Dodger anymore. I'm pretty certain I thought it was unfair.

Today I know the Messersmith (and Dave McNally) story well, and all of the aftermath. For years as a youngster, I was on the side of the owners, I couldn't believe the salaries and I just fell in line with what I read in the opinion columns of the time and complaints from relatives.

Much later I realized that free agency grew the game like almost nothing else and it not only made lots of players rich but it made teams richer in record numbers.

Fans still complain about the money players ask and the amount teams spend. I'm a Dodger fan, I hear all the whining. But, inside, I think they know that players being able to decide where they play is a good thing. That's all that Andy Messersmith wanted. It wasn't about the money back then, he said. It was about being able to control his own destiny.


Sure, I still slip into why are we paying this guy so much money when he can't get outs?????? See my reaction to just about every Tanner Scott appearance this year. But overall I don't think we'd be seeing the quality of play that we do now if every player had to walk into the general manager's office every year to find out his worth.

Work is difficult, no matter what you do. It's nice to be paid what you're worth. Take it from me, working another Labor Day in a job that demands a lot but doesn't pay a lot. I know.

Comments

Jeremya1um said…
Unions are a good thing and all professions need them to get a fair working wage from owners.
Brett Alan said…
Sports generates a huge amount of money. When players don't get paid like that, it just means the owners get even richer. That's the part a lot of those opinion writers didn't acknowledge.
Fuji said…
A. When I was a kid, the first day of school was right after Labor Day. But ever since I started teaching (back in the late 90's), my district has started in mid-August. I'm kinda torn on whether or not I'd want to start later, because that means we'd probably finish the school year in late June (instead of mid-June).

B. My brother always gets heated when we talk about how much money athletes make. Personally... I'm okay with it. The owners make a ton of money, so I'm all about them sharing it with the guys on the field.
Billy Kingsley said…
Free agency is only fair. If the players had no choice in where they played, then they are just indentured servants to the owners, and that's all kinds of wrong.

Imagine, if you will...you work in the newspaper, that's what you've chosen to do. Now imagine if the newspaper owners decide to trade you to a dog food factory. You have no say in the matter, you HAVE to go, or they fine you incessantly. That's insanity...yet so many people want that to happen to athletes.
Nick Vossbrink said…
Really wish there was a 1976 Hostess card showing Messersmith with the Braves. As far as I've been able to find the only 1976 "traded" of him is an MSA disc.
Old Cards said…
What a great lineup of Messersmith cards. Looks like binder pages from a player collector.

I knew and followed MLB baseball before free agency. It was a lot of fun following teams when you knew the same guys were going to be on the same team year after year. It was easier to identify with players when the difference between their monetary situation and yours was not astronomical. I disagree with your comment about the quality of play. It was excellent before free agency and the players were highly motivated to perform knowing they might get an increase in salary and they were motivated by their love of the game. The owners invest capital and take all the monetary risks making a lot of money when business is good and losing money when business is bad, The players have guaranteed contracts, so they get paid regardless of the team's revenue and whether they have a good year or a bad year. Billy Kingsley makes a good point with his comparison of MLB players to regular workers and having the freedom to move around. Not sure what the answer is, but it is a good debate subject. Enjoy your blog!
Jamie Meyers said…
Free agency and union involvement are both good things, though the system surely has flaws. The Messersmith autograph is a good card to have, as he is a very difficult signer. He is generally nice about it but definitely doesn't like signing stuff at all. I was fortunate enough to get my 75 card card signed awhile back. Autograph values don't mean that much to me so I've not spent any time pondering this but it might be one of the more valuable signed 75s I have - and I have lots of the stars' autos in my binder. I read all your posts but seldom comment. Have enjoyed this blog for years.